pubs.acs.org/joc
allows the reaction to be run under homogeneous condi-
Influence of Bases and Ligands on the Outcome of the
Cu(I)-Catalyzed Oxidative Homocoupling of
Terminal Alkynes to 1,4-Disubstituted 1,3-Diynes
Using Oxygen as an Oxidant
tions)6 and Hay’s procedure, which relies on the use of
catalytic amounts of Cu(I) salt as a catalyst, tertiary amines
such as pyridine or N,N,N’,N’-tetramethylethylenediamine
(TMEDA) as complexing agents, and O2 as an oxidant.7
Other methods for the synthesis of 1,4-disubstituted
1,3-diynes include the Cadiot-Chodkiewicz8 and the Sono-
gashira9 couplings. Recently, it has been shown that the
oxidative homocoupling of terminal alkynes can be accom-
plished by a combination of a Pd catalyst and a Cu(I) salt.10
Even if the Pd-catalyzed reactions are highly efficient and
proceed under mild reaction conditions, the Pd catalysts are
far more expensive than the cheap and easily available Cu(I)
salts. Another disadvantage of many of these protocols is
that oxidants other than O2 need to be used for the reoxida-
tion of Pd(0) to Pd(II).10a-10c,10f Finally, with some of the
Pd-catalyzed systems the formation of the desired homo-
coupling products is accompanied by the formation of side
products such as enynes. In addition, the Cu(II)-catalyzed
homocoupling reaction of terminal alkynes in supercritical
CO2 has been reported.11 This protocol requires special
equipment and high CO2 pressure at elevated temperatures.
Using CuAl-hydrotalcite as a catalyst, an additional step for
the preparation of the reagent is needed.12
Subbarayappa Adimurthy,† Chandi C. Malakar,‡ and
Uwe Beifuss*,‡
†Central Salt & Marine Chemicals Research Institute,
Gijubhai Badheka Marg, Bhavnagar 364 002, Gujrat, India,
and ‡Bioorganische Chemie, Institut fu€r Chemie, Universita€t
Hohenheim, Garbenstr. 30, D-70599 Stuttgart, Germany
Received February 10, 2009
The further development of the Cu(I) salt catalyzed
coupling using O2 as an oxidant appeared to be the most
attractive approach in order to meet the demand for high
yields and high selectivities, simple experimental proce-
dures under mild reaction conditions, avoidance of
expensive and/or harmful reagents, and use of O2 as an
environmentally benign oxidant. Quite unexpectedly we
found that only a few experiments have so far been
published on the influence of ligands, bases, and reaction
conditions on the outcome of this type of coupling.
Brandsma mentioned that the yields of the homocoup-
ling of terminal alkynes can be increased by adding
small amounts of 1,8-diazabicycloundec-7-ene (DBU).13
However, a detailed study of the influence of bases is
missing. The same holds true for the influence of ligands.
The efficient Cu(I)-catalyzed oxidative homocoupling of
terminal alkynes in the presence of a base using an amine
as a ligand and oxygen as an oxidant yields the symme-
trical 1,3-diynes with yields of up to 99%. The outcome of
the couplings critically depends on the proper choice of
base and ligand as well as reaction conditions. Best results
were observed with 2.0 mol % CuCl, 1.5 mol % TMEDA
or DBEDA, and DBU or DABCO in acetonitrile.
The dimerization of terminal alkynes through oxidative
homocoupling to give 1,3-diynes is an important C-C bond-
formation reaction.1 It has been employed for a number of
applications, including the construction of linear π-conju-
gated acetylenic oligomers and polymers,2 the synthesis of
natural products,3 and molecular recognition processes.4
The reaction dates back to 1869 when C. Glaser observed
the formation of a precipitate upon the reaction of a terminal
alkyne with a Cu(I) salt in the presence of aqueous ammonia;
after air oxidation the oxidative homocoupling product was
isolated.5 A number of improvements of the original method
have emerged, including the Eglington procedure (which
(7) Hay, A. S. J. Org. Chem. 1960, 25, 1275. Hay, A. S. J. Org. Chem.
1962, 27, 3320.
(8) Cadiot, P.; Chodkiewicz, W. In Chemistry of Acetylenes; Viehe, H.
G., Ed.; Marcel Dekker: New York, 1969; p 597.
(9) (a) Sonogashira, K.; Tohda, Y.; Hagihara, N. Tetrahedron Lett. 1975,
16, 4467. (b) For a review, see: Sonogashira, K. Coupling reactions between
sp carbon centers. In Comprehensive Organic Synthesis; Trost, B. M.,
Fleming, I., Eds.; Pergamon Press: Oxford, 1990; Vol. 3, p 521.
(10) (a) Rossi, R.; Carpita, A.; Bigelli, C. Tetrahedron Lett. 1985, 26, 523.
(b) Liu, Q.; Burton, D. J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 4371. (c) Lei, A.;
Srivastava, M.; Zhang, X. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 1969. (d) Fairlamb, I. J. S.;
€
Bauerlein, P. S.; Marrison, L. R.; Dickinson, J. M. Chem. Commun. 2003,
632. (e) Batsanov, A. S.; Collings, J. C.; Fairlamb, I. J. S.; Holland, J. P.;
Howard, J. A. K.; Lin, Z.; Marder, T. B.; Parsons, A. C.; Ward, R. M.; Zhu,
J. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 703. (f) Li, J.-H.; Liang, Y.; Zhang, X.-D.
Tetrahedron 2005, 61, 1903. (g) Li, J. H.; Liang, Y.; Xie, Y.-X. J. Org. Chem.
2005, 70, 4393. (h) Shi, M.; Qian, H. X. Appl. Organomet. Chem. 2006, 20,
771. (i) Yang, F.; Cui, X.; Li, Y.; Zhang, J.; Ren, G.; Wu, Y. Tetrahedron
2007, 63, 1963.
(11) Li, J.; Jiang, H. Chem. Commun. 1999, 2369. Jiang, H.-F.; Tang, J.-Y.;
Wang, A.-Z.; Deng, G.-H.; Yang, S.-R. Synthesis 2006, 1155.
(12) Zhu, B. C.; Jiang, X. Z. Appl. Organomet. Chem. 2007, 21, 345.
(13) Brandsma, L. Preparative Acetylenic Chemistry; Elsevier: Amsterdam,
1988; Chapter 10.
(1) For a review, see: Siemsen, P.; Livingston, R. C.; Diederich, F.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 2632.
(2) Tour, J. M. Chem. Rev. 1996, 96, 537. Martin, R. E.; Diederich, F.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1999, 38, 1350.
(3) For reviews, see: Shi Shun, A. L. K.; Tykwinski, R. R. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 1034. Bohlmann, F.; Burkhardt, T.; Zdero, C. Naturally
Occuring Acetylenes; Academic Press: New York, 1973.
(4) Lehn, J. M. Supramolecular Chemistry: Concepts and Perspectives;
VCH: Weinheim, 1995.
(5) Glaser, C. Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges. 1869, 2, 422.
(6) Eglington, G.; Galbraith, R. J. Chem. Soc. 1959, 889.
5648 J. Org. Chem. 2009, 74, 5648–5651
Published on Web 06/11/2009
DOI: 10.1021/jo900246z
r
2009 American Chemical Society