AuCl3/AgSbF6 is believed to involve an electrophilic attack
on the triple bond.
We carried out several experiments to ascertain the nature
of gold species responsible for the transformation and to find
out the optimum reaction conditions (Table 1). For this
might helped the annulation to occur.6 However, the AuCl3/
AgOTf combination was not as effective as AuCl3/AgSbF6
(entry 10). While there was no product formation with
(Ph3P)AuCl, cationic (Ph3P)AuCl/AgSbF6-catalyzed reaction
yielded only 3% of the product (entries 11 and 12).
The [Au+] species in (Ph3P)AuCl and (Ph3P)AuCl/AgSbF6
is considered to be π-philic, whereas the [Au3+] in AuCl3 is
oxophilic.7 In a similar reported TiCl4-assisted annulation,3c
TiCl4 was needed in stoichimetric amounts, and moreover,
no reaction was observed when 2 equiv of aldehyde with
respect to TiCl4 were used. The authors claimed that the
TiCl4-bis(carbonyl) complex formed with 2 equiv of the
aldehyde did not give room for the coordination of Ti to
alkyne. Hence, with the catalytic amounts of gold in the
present reaction, it gives the impression that the alkynophi-
licity of gold might play a role for the reaction to take place
by bringing the alkyne close to the carbonyl function. The
above observations reveal that a gold species which is both
oxo- and alkynophilic is essential. This postulation was
supported by carrying out two distinct experiments with
lesser amounts of AgSbF6 added to AuCl3, which is expected
to proportionately lower the cationic character of [Au3+]
compared to that when 3 equiv of AgSbF6 with respect to
the amount of AuCl3 was used. Keeping the catalyst loading
of AuCl3 at 2 mol %, when the amount of AgSbF6 was varied
to 4 mol % and 2 mol % the reactions resulted in lower
yields in proportion to the amount of AgSbF6 used (entries
13 and 14). In order to draw more support, we carried out
the reaction with CuCl2/AgSbF6 as copper also has the ability
to complex with alkynes. Fascinatingly, it gave the naph-
thalene derivative with a yield comparable to that of the
AuCl3/AgSbF6-catalyzed reaction (entry 16). However, the
reaction required more time. The reactions employing CuCl/
AgSbF6 and Cu(OTf)2 were not that effective (entries 17 and
18).
Table 1. Screening of Different Catalysts and Conditions in the
Annulation of Phenylacetaldehyde and Phenylacetylene
time yieldg
entry
catalyst
solvent and condition (h)
(%)
a
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
AuCl3
CH2Cl2/4 Å MS, reflux 12 3
AuCl3a/AgSbF6
AgSbF6
CH2Cl2, rt
CH2Cl2/4 Å MS, reflux 12
4
41
5
b
b
AuCl3a/AgSbF6
AuCl3a/AgSbF6
AuCl3a/AgSbF6
AuCl3a/AgSbF6
AuCl3a/AgSbF6
AuCl3a/AgSbF6
CH2Cl2/4 Å MS, rt
CH2Cl2/4 Å MS, reflux
CH2Cl2/4 Å MS, reflux
DCE, rt
4
5
5
51
69
51h
b
b
b
b
b
b
24 40
DCE, reflux
DCE/4 Å MS, reflux
CH2Cl2/4 Å MS, rt
4
5
59
64
10 AuCl3a/AgOTfb
11 (Ph3P)AuCla
20 16
CH2Cl2/4 Å MS, reflux 14
0
12 (Ph3P)AuCla/AgSbF6 CH2Cl2/4 Å MS, reflux 12
3
a
13 AuCl3a/AgSbF6
CH2Cl2/4 Å MS, reflux
CH2Cl2/4 Å MS, reflux
5
5
25
7
c
a
14 AuCl3a/AgSbF6
15 NaAuCl4.2H2Oa
CH2Cl2/4 Å MS, reflux 12 14
CH2Cl2/4 Å MS, reflux 22 67
CH2Cl2/4 Å MS, reflux 14 21
16 CuCl2a/AgSbF6
c
17 CuCla/AgSbF6
a
a
18 Cu(OTf)2
CH2Cl2/4 Å MS, reflux 16
7
19 FeCl3a/AgSbF6
CH2Cl2/4 Å MS, reflux 20 32
CH2Cl2/4 Å MS, reflux 16 62
b
20 TiCl4a/AgSbF6
d
b
21 HCl/AgSbF6
22 Sn(OTf)2
23 Sn(OTf)2
CH2Cl2/4 Å MS, reflux
CH2Cl2/4 Å MS, rt
CH2Cl2/4 Å MS, rt
5
24
e
20 trace
20 61
f
a 2 mol %. b 6 mol %. c 4 mol %. d 8 mol %. e 5 mol %. f 100 mol %.
g Isolated yield. h Reaction carried with premixed catalysts.
We then went to the extent of attempting the reaction with
catalytic amounts (2 mol %) of FeCl3 and TiCl4 in combina-
tion with AgSbF6. To our delight, the reaction worked well
with catalytic TiCl4/AgSbF6 as well. This finding hints that
the counteranion SbF6- could also play a certain role in the
purpose, simple substrates, phenylacetaldehyde and pheny-
lacetylene, were used. Our first attempt using 2 mol % of
AuCl3 in anhydrous CH2Cl2 was not encouraging as only
less than 3% yield of 1-phenylnaphthalene was obtained. The
yield did not improve even in the presence of 4 Å molecular
sieves, which improved the yields in other attempts (vide
supra) after 12 h of reflux (entry 1). To our delight, reaction
using a mixture of AuCl3 (2 mol %) and AgSbF6 (6 mol %)
in CH2Cl2 gave 41% of 1-phenylnaphthalene in 4 h at room
temperature (entry 2). The yield improved considerably when
the reaction was refluxed in the presence of 4 Å molecular
sieves (entries 4 and 5). Notably, only 5% of the product
was obtained when AgSbF6 (6 mol %) alone was used as
the catalyst (entry 3). It indicates that the cationic character
of gold which is achieved by the addition of AgSbF6 to AuCl3
(4) (a) Dudnik, A. S.; Schwier, T.; Gevorgyan, V. Org. Lett. 2008, 10,
1465. (b) Dudnik, A. S.; Schwier, T.; Gevorgyan, V. Tetrahedron 2009,
65, 1859.
(5) (a) Asao, A.; Takahashi, K.; Lee, S.; Kasahara, T.; Yamamoto, Y.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 12650. (b) Asao, A.; Nogami, T.; Lee, S.;
Yamamoto, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 10921.
(6) One of the reviewers of this manuscript evoked the possibility that
Bronsted acid HSbF6, which could form under the reaction conditions, could
have catalyzed the reaction. We examined the reaction using HSbF6 (formed
by passing HCl gas through a solution of AgSbF6 in CH2Cl2, see the
Supporting Information for complete details). However, the yield of the
product was roughly 1/3 of that of obtained employing AuCl3/AgSbF6.
Further, he had revealed that their attempts to generate cationic [Au3+] were
unsuccessful as gold precipitated quickly. In our attempts we did not see
any precipitation of gold. We believe that, in the presence of excess
aldehyde, the [Au3+] species is stabilized by the coordination to aldehyde
molecules. This draws support from one of our observations that when
phenylacetylene and phenylacetaldehyde were added after 15 min to
premixed AuCl3 and AgSbF6, the yield of the naphthalene derivative dropped
to 51%.
(3) For a review, see: (a) de Koning, C. B.; Rousseau, A. L.; van Otterlo,
W. A. L. Tetrahedron 2003, 59, 7. For the latest syntheses, see: (b)
Viswanathan, G. S.; Wang, M.; Li, C.-J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41,
2138. (c) Kabalka, G. W.; Ju, Y.; Wu, Z. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 7915.
(d) Barluenga, J.; Va´zquez-Villa, H.; Ballesteros, A.; Gonza´lez, J. M. Org.
Lett. 2003, 5, 4121. (e) Zhang, X.; Sarkar, S.; Larock, R. C. J. Org. Chem.
2006, 71, 236. (f) Wang, Y.; Xu, J.; Burton, D. J. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71,
7780. (g) Duan, S.; Sinha-Mahapatra, D. K.; Herndon, J. W. Org. Lett.
2008, 10, 1541.
(7) Sromek, A. W.; Rubina, M.; Gevorgyan, V. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005,
127, 10500. (b) Dudnik, A. S.; Gevorgyan, V. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007,
46, 5195. (c) Dudnik, A. S.; Sromek, A. W.; Rubina, M.; Kim, J. T.; Kel’in,
A. V.; Gevorgyan, V. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 1440.
Org. Lett., Vol. 11, No. 14, 2009
3117