framework, should be useful in preparing many other
members of the family.
The early stages of our approach to (+)-amabiline
involved functionalization of the non-halogenated double
bond within the cis-1,2-dihydrocatechol 3 (Scheme 1), a
prevent cleavage of the TBS ether. The stage was now
set for a Suzuki-Miyaura cross coupling8 of compound
6 with the commercially available boronic acid 7 which
proceeded smoothly [using (Pd(PPh3)4, Na2CO3 and
benzene] to give the desired product 8 in 90% yield.
Removal of the TBS ether within the last compound was
readily achieved using TBAF and so generating allylic
alcohol 9 in 94% yield.
Scheme 1. Synthesis of Substrate 9 for the
Eschenmoser-Claisen Rearrangement Reaction
With compound 9 in hand, the construction of the
quaternary carbon center associated with (+)-amabiline
could now be addressed (Scheme 2). We envisaged that
the Eschenmoser variant of the Claisen rearrangement
reaction4 would provide an effective means for doing so.
Pleasingly, exposure of substrate 9 to N,N-dimethylac-
etamide dimethyl acetal in toluene at 120 °C for 16 h
resulted in the generation of the expected product 10 in
95% yield. Reduction of the newly introduced tertiary
amide moiety was effected by treating compound 10 with
lithium triethylborohydride, and in this manner the cor-
responding primary alcohol, 11, could be obtained in 94%
yield. A short sequence of steps was now required to
obtain a substrate capable of engaging in an intramolecular
SN′ reaction to establish the 5-membered C-ring of the
target framework. Toward such ends (Scheme 2), alcohol
11 was converted (using I2 and PPh3) into the correspond-
ing iodide 12 which was, in turn, treated with sodium azide
to give compound 13 (85% yield, 2 steps). DDQ-mediated
cleavage of the PMB ether moiety within azide 13 then
gave allylic alcohol 14 in 92% yield. Conversion of
compound 14 into the corresponding mesylate 15 (MsCl,
Et3N) proved straightforward and set the stage for a
Staudinger reduction.9 It was anticipated this would
generate a primary amine capable of engaging in a
spontaneous intramolecular SN′-reaction, thereby forming
the C-ring of target (+)-2. In accord with such expecta-
tions, treatment of azide 15 with PPh3 in THF/H2O resulted
in the formation of the 3a-arylhexahydroindole 16 in good
yield (70%, over 2 steps). Subjection of compound 16 to
treatment with paraformaldehyde and formic acid at 80
°C for 16 h effected a Pictet-Spengler cyclization
reaction, accompanied by cleavage of the acetonide residue
and formylation of the resulting diol, to give 17 (70%).
Completion of the synthesis of (+)-amabiline required
reduction of the ∆3-double bond and hydrolysis of the
formate ester moieties within 17. Conveniently, this could
be achieved in a one-pot process, whereby K2CO3 was
added to the reaction mixture used for effecting hydro-
genation (H2, 5% Pd/C, MeOH). In this manner (+)-
amabiline was obtained directly and in 93% yield from
precursor 17. The spectral data (NMR, MS, IR) derived
from this material were in full accord with the assigned
structure and in excellent agreement with the literature
commodity chemical that can be obtained in large quantity
and enantiomerically pure form via the whole-cell medi-
ated biotransformation of bromobenzene.5 Thus, the
conversion of compound 3 into diol 46 was readily
achieved by initial formation of the corresponding ac-
etonide followed by dihydroxylation of this intermediate
(94% yield, 2 steps). Selective protection (TBSCl, imi-
dazole) of the allylic hydroxyl group within product 4 was
readily achieved under conventional conditions and so
afforded monoether 5. Conversion of the latter compound
into the corresponding PMB ether 6 (93%, 2 steps)
required the use of p-methoxybenzyl trichloroacetimidate
-7
(PMBTCA) in combination with Ph3C+BF4 so as to
(5) Compound 3 can be obtained from the Aldrich Chemical Co.
(Catalogue Number 489492) or from Questor, Queen’s University of Belfast,
on methods for generating cis-1,2-dihydrocatechols by microbial dihy-
droxylation of the corresponding aromatics, as well as the synthetic
applications of these metabolites, see: (a) Hudlicky, T.; Gonzalez, D.;
Gibson, D. T. Aldrichim. Acta 1999, 32, 35. (b) Banwell, M. G.; Edwards,
A. J.; Harfoot, G. J.; Jolliffe, K. A.; McLeod, M. D.; McRae, K. J.; Stewart,
S. G.; Vo¨gtle, M. Pure Appl. Chem. 2003, 75, 223. (c) Johnson, R. A. Org.
React. 2004, 63, 117. (d) Hudlicky, T.; Reed, J. W. Synlett 2009, 685.
(6) (a) Hudlicky, T.; Price, J. D.; Rulin, F.; Tsunoda, T. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1990, 112, 9439. (b) Hudlicky, T.; Rulin, F.; Tsunoda, T.; Luna, H.;
Andersen, C.; Price, J. D. Isr. J. Chem. 1991, 31, 229.
(7) (a) Ireland, R. E.; Liu, L.; Roper, T. D. Tetrahedron 1997, 53, 13221.
(b) Paterson, I.; Coster, M. J.; Chen, D. Y.-K.; Acen˜a, J. L.; Bach, J.; Keown,
L. E.; Trieselmann, T. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2005, 3, 2420.
(8) Miyaura, N.; Yanagi, T.; Suzuki, A. Synth. Commun. 1981, 11, 513.
(9) For a useful point-of-entry into the literature on the Staudinger
reaction see: Ku¨rti, L.; Czako´, B. Strategic Applications of Named Reactions
in Organic Synthesis; Elsevier Academic: Burlington, MA, 2005; pp
428-429.
Org. Lett., Vol. 11, No. 14, 2009
3161