C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
to be suitable, leading to the conditions of entry 12.11 One last round
of fine-tuning10 examined the influence of solvent, ligand, and reaction
time under the provisionally optimal conditions (1.1 equiv of DMA
and pinBH, 25 °C, 16 h). Although no diphosphine ligand bettered
TANIAPHOS,10 use of dioxane as solvent led to an improved ee of
91% (entry 13). Furthermore, the reaction is complete within 4 h (entry
14; 92% ee).
Realizing the sensitive nature of allylic boronates, we sought to
develop a one-pot borylation/isomerization/allylation protocol that
would circumvent the isolation of 3. This was achieved by simple
addition of the aldehyde and increasing the temperature to 80 °C
(eq 3). Considering it is a two-stage process, products of representa-
tive aldehydes were obtained in acceptable isolated yields and with
high stereoselectivity.12
This novel catalytic enantioselective process is proving suitable to
prepare other classes of heterocyclic allylic boronates. When subjected
to similar conditions, the parent N-Boc piperidine 5 provided the
allylboration products 7 in good yields with 86% ee (eq 4).12 Compared
to the pyran analogue, the intermediate allylboronate 6 was formed in
a lower 4:1 ratio with the corresponding alkenylboronate.10 Aldehyde
allylation with 6 proceeded cleanly under microwave heating. Further
optimization could focus on varying the carbamate O-substituent.
In conclusion, an efficient catalytic enantioselective preparation of
heterocyclic allylic boronates was described. The overall borylation
constitutes a successful example of formal asymmetric isomerization
of allylic ether/amine. Reagents 3 and 6 add to various aldehydes to
give useful R-hydroxyalkyl pyrans and piperidines in high stereose-
lectivity. Applications and extensions of this method are underway.
Acknowledgment. This work was funded by the Natural Sciences
and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada and the
University of Alberta. S.L. thanks the U of A for a Queen Elizabeth
II Graduate Scholarship. The authors thank Solvias AG (Dr. H. Steiner
and Dr. H.-U. Blaser) for a generous gift of ligands and Michelle
Morrow for assistance with preliminary experiments.
A tentative mechanistic cycle must reconcile the unlikeliness of 2
being an intermediate. The 3:2 ratio remains essentially unchanged
with temperature and time under the optimal reaction conditions.10
Moreover, a control using a 50:50 mixture of 1 and 2 as substrates
produced 3 and 2 in a 45:55 ratio.13 Alkenylboronate 2 is the sole
product when B2pin2 is employed, which suggests the involvement of
a Pd hydride species when pinBH is used.14 Thus, a stereodetermining
hydropalladation (1 to II via I) may be key to the isomerization to III
(via ꢀ-H elimination) (Figure 1). It would be followed by a stereospe-
cific and regioselective allylic borylation of the reactive intermediate
III into 3, via IV and V. The deuteration pattern of 6 prepared from
pinBD and 5 is consistent with this proposed cycle (see box, Figure
1).10 The role of the base, however, is unclear at this preliminary stage.
Supporting Information Available: Full experimental details,
additional tables of optimization studies, chiral HPLC chromatograms,
and NMR spectral reproductions for new compounds. This material is
References
(1) Prisant, L. M. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2008, 48, 225–239.
(2) (a) Tailor, J.; Hall, D. G. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 3715–3718. (b) Deligny, M.;
Carreaux, F.; Carboni, B.; Toupet, L.; Dujardin, G. Chem. Commun. 2003,
276–277.
(3) (a) Gao, X.; Hall, D. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 9308–9309. (b)
Gao, X.; Hall, D. G.; Deligny, M.; Favre, A.; Carreaux, F.; Carboni, B.
Chem.sEur. J. 2006, 13, 3132–3142.
(4) Gao, X.; Hall, D. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 1628–1629.
(5) Murata, M.; Oyama, T.; Watanabe, S.; Masuda, Y. Synthesis 2000, 778–
780.
(6) For rare examples, see: (a) Hiroya, K.; Kurihara, Y.; Ogasawara, K. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1995, 34, 2287–2289. (b) Faitg, T.; Soulie´, J.;
Lallemand, J.-Y.; Mercier, F.; Mathey, F. Tetrahedron 2000, 56, 101–104.
(7) Krompiec, C.; Krompiec, M.; Penczek, R.; Ignasiak, H. Coord. Chem. ReV.
2008, 252, 1819–1841.
(8) (a) Noyori, R. Asymmetric Catalysis in Organic Synthesis; John Wiley &
Sons: New York, 1994; Chapter 2, pp 95-121. (b) Otsuka, S.; Tani, K.
Synthesis 1991, 665. (c) Inoue, S.-i.; Takaya, H.; Tani, K; Otsuka, S.; Sato,
T.; Noyori, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 4897–4905, and references
cited.
(9) Type SL-T001-1 was used. Ireland, T.; Tappe, K.; Grossheimann, G.;
Knochel, P. Chem.sEur. J. 2002, 8, 843–852. Structure corrigendum:
Chem.sEur. J. 2008, 14, 3509.
(10) See details and additional results in the Supporting Information.
(11) At this stage, one last screen of several Pd sources confirmed that Pd(OAc)2
is the most suitable precatalyst although Pd(O2CCF3)2, Pd(PPh3)4, and PdCl2
were equally efficient.
(12) Unoptimized isolated yields from a reaction scale of 1.0 mmol of 1 or 5.
The ee’s of products 4a, 4c-e, and 7a-b were measured by chiral HPLC.10
The ee of 4b was measured by 19F NMR of its Mosher ester.10 Values for
all products are similar within analytical error: it is known that pyranyl
allylic boronates similar to 3 (cf. eq 1) do not suffer erosion of optical
purity in the allylboration process (ref 3b). As in the allylboration of eq 1
(ref 3b), only one diastereomer was identified.
(13) Product 2 was prepared independently according to: Takagi, J.; Takahashi,
K.; Ishiyama, T.; Miyaura, N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 8001–8006.
(14) Murata, M.; Oyama, T.; Watanabe, S.; Masuda, Y. J. Org. Chem. 2000,
65, 164–168.
Figure 1. Postulated mechanism for the borylation/isomerization of 1 to
give 3. (Note: the chiral diphosphine ligand was simplified.)
JA903946F
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 131, NO. 28, 2009 9613