LETTER
Synthesis of b-Amino Disulfides
1231
tion (25 mL). Ethyl acetate was removed under vacuum and the sul-
famidate peptide 19 was purified by SiO2 (100–200 mesh) column
chromatography; yield 60% (0.869 g); white solid; mp 117 °C;
[a]D25 –19.33 (c 1, CHCl3). IR (neat): 3373 (br), 2959 (m), 1744 (s),
1708 (s), 1549 (w), 1390 (m), 1326 (m), 1197 (m), 1151 (m), 1052
(w), 885 (w), 831 (m) cm–1. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): d = 6.81
(1 H, d, J = 7.8 Hz), 5.06–4.98 (1 H, m), 4.66–4.61 (1 H, m), 3.73
(3 H, s), 1.72–1.45 (15 H, m), 0.93 (3 H, d, J = 6.0 Hz). 13C NMR
(75 MHz, CDCl3): d = 172.4, 165.8, 148.6, 86.7, 78.8, 64.6, 52.3,
51.0, 41.1, 27.7, 24.7, 22.7, 21.6, 18.9. HRMS: m/z calcd for
C16H28N2O8S [M + Na]+: 431.1464; found: 431.1446.
coupling reactions. To demonstrate the utility of this
method for direct incorporation of unnatural amino acid
containing disulfide bond into a peptide, we synthesized a
peptide 19 by coupling sulfamidate 18 with (NH2-Leu-
OMe) leucine methyl ester (Scheme 6). The reaction of 19
with tetrathiomolybdate 1 gave the peptide 20 as a single
diastereomer16 containing 3,3¢-dimethyl cystine in good
yield (76%).
In summary we have disclosed an easy method for direct
access to b-amino disulfides by regioselective ring open-
ing of sulfamidates with tetrathiomolybdate 1. The versa-
tility of this reaction has been shown by preparing a
number of b-amino disulfides having different N-protect-
ing groups, and the stability of these protecting groups un-
der the reaction conditions have been evaluated. This
methodology was also extended to serine- and threonine-
derived sulfamidates to furnish the corresponding cystine
and 3,3¢-dimethyl cystine derivatives which are biologi-
cally important amino acids. Further studies of the reactiv-
ityofstructurallydiversesulfamidateswithtetrathiomolybdate
are in progress.
b-Amino Disulfides; Typical Procedure
Synthesis of 10a
To a well-stirred solution of sulfamidate 9a (0.151g, 0.50 mmol) in
MeCN (6 mL) was added [BnNEt3]2MoS4 (1, 0.365g, 0.6 mmol) in
portions over a period of 5 min. The reaction mixture was stirred for
further 45 min at r.t. To this solution 2 N HCl (3 mL) was added,
and the stirring was continued for further 12 h at r.t. Finally, the
reaction mixture was neutralized by addition of NH4OH solution
and extracted with EtOAc (4 × 20 mL). The combined organic ex-
tract was washed with brine, dried over anhyd Na2SO4, and concen-
trated under vacuum. The crude product was purified by SiO2 (100–
200 mesh) column chromatography.
25
Yield 90% (0.115 g); oily liquid; [a]D +73.61 (c 1, CHCl3). IR
(neat): 3324 (br), 3058 (m), 3024 (s), 2919 (s), 2846 (m), 1601 (w),
1493 (s), 1453 (s), 1110 (m), 741 (s), 698 (s) cm–1. 1H NMR (300
MHz, CDCl3): d = 7.29–7.11 (10 H, m), 3.77 (2 H, d, J = 3.0 Hz),
3.06 (1 H, m), 2.81–2.66 (4 H, m), 1.90 (1 H, br s). 13C NMR (75
MHz, CDCl3): d = 140.0, 138.4, 129.3, 128.4, 128.0, 126.9, 126.3,
57.4, 51.1, 43.4, 39.8. HRMS: m/z calcd for C32H32N2S2 [M + H]+:
513.2398; found: 513.2396.
N-Boc-, N-Cbz-, and N-Fmoc-Protected Sulfamidates; Typical
Procedure
Synthesis of 9k
Step I: A solution of SOCl2 (0.47 mL, 6.5 mmol) in dry MeCN (15
mL) under nitrogen was cooled to –40 °C, and then tert-butyl (S)-1-
hydroxybutan-2-ylcarbamate (0.945g, 5 mmol) in dry MeCN (10
mL) was added dropwise over 10 min, stirring was continued for
further 45 min at the same temperature. Dry pyridine (1.9 mL, 25
mmol) was then added. The reaction mixture was further stirred for
1 h and was allowed to warm to r.t. The reaction mixture was
quenched with H2O and extracted with EtOAc (3 × 20 mL). The
combined organic portions were then washed with H2O, dried over
anhyd Na2SO4 and concentrated in vacuum to afford the crude sulf-
amidite. This was used without further purification in the next step.
Compound 20
Yield 76% (0.137 g); gummy solid; [a]D25 –12.00 (c 1, CHCl3). IR
(neat): 3327 (br), 2961 (m), 2932 (w), 1748 (m), 1687 (m), 1651 (s),
1550 (m), 1522 (m), 1367 (w), 1250 (w), 1162 (m), 1008 (w) cm–1.
1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): d = 6.52 (1 H, d, J = 9.0 Hz), 5.34 (1
H, d, J = 9.0 Hz), 4.62–4.55 (1 H, m), 4.16 (1 H, dd, J = 6.0, 9.0
Hz), 3.73 (3 H, s), 3.20 (1 H, m), 1.77–1.59 (3 H, m), 1.56 (9 H, s),
1.40 (3 H, d, J = 6.0 Hz), 0.92 (6 H, d, J = 4.5 Hz). 13C NMR (75
MHz, CDCl3): d = 172.9, 169.9, 155.5, 80.4, 60.0, 52.3, 50.8, 41.2,
36.7, 28.2, 24.7, 22.7, 21.7, 21.0. HRMS: m/z calcd for
C32H58N4O10S2 [M + Na]+: 745.3492; found: 745.3476.
Step II: To a cooled (ice bath) solution of crude (step I) sulfamidite
(5 mmol) in MeCN (30 mL) was added RhCl3 (20 mg), followed by
NaIO4 (1.60 g, 7.50 mmol) and then H2O (30 mL). The mixture was
stirred at 0 °C for 2 h, then diluted with Et2O, and the phases were
separated. The aqueous phase was extracted with Et2O. The com-
bined organic portions were washed with NaHCO3 soln and then
brine. The solution was dried over anhyd Na2SO4 and concentrated.
The crude product was purified by SiO2 (100–200 mesh) column
Acknowledgment
Nasir Baig R. B. thanks CSIR New Delhi for a Senior Research Fel-
lowship and IISc for financial assistance.
25
chromatography; yield 84% (1.05 g); white solid; mp 70 °C; [a]D
3.18 (c 1, CHCl3). IR (neat): 2978 (m), 1734 (s), 1372 (s), 1321 (s),
1193 (s), 1150 (s), 928 (m), 655 (m) cm–1. H NMR (400 MHz,
1
References and Notes
CDCl3): d = 4.64 (1 H, dd, J = 6.4, 8.0 Hz), 4.33 (1 H, dd, J = 1.6,
9.4 Hz), 4.27 (1 H, m), 1.90 (2 H, m), 1.55 (9 H, s), 0.97 (3 H, t,
J = 8.0 Hz). 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): d = 148.6, 85.2, 69.2, 58.4,
27.8, 25.1, 8.7. HRMS: m/z calcd for C9H17NO5S [M + Na]+:
274.0725; found: 274.0732.
(1) (a) Cohen, S. C.; Halcomb, R. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002,
124, 2534. (b) Bower, J. F.; Szeto, P.; Gallagher, T. Org.
Biomol. Chem. 2007, 5, 143. (c) Bower, J. F.; Szeto, P.;
Gallagher, T. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 4901. (d) Avenoza, A.;
Busto, J. H.; Jimenez-Oses, G.; Peregrina, J. M. Org. Lett.
2006, 8, 2855. (e) Bower, J. F.; Chakthong, S.; Svenda, J.;
Williams, A. J.; Lawrence, R. M.; Szeto, P.; Gallagher, T.
Org. Biomol. Chem. 2006, 4, 1868. (f) Bower, J. F.; Svenda,
J.; Williams, A. J.; Charmant, J. P. H.; Lawrence, R. M.;
Szeto, P.; Gallagher, T. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 4727.
Synthesis of 19
A solution of 18 (1.0 g, 3.55 mmol), HCl·NH2-Leu-OMe (0.618 g,
4.2 mmol, 1.2 equiv), N-methyl morpholine (1.16 mL, 10.6 mmol,
3 equiv) in EtOAc (50 mL) was cooled to 0 °C and DCC (1.09 g,
5.32 mmol, 1.5 equiv) was added in small portions. The reaction
mixture was brought to r.t. (28 °C) and stirred for 12 h. The reaction
mixture was cooled and filtered. The filtrate was washed with sat.
citric acid solution (25 mL), sat. Na2CO3 (25 mL), and brine solu-
(g) Avenoza, A.; Busto, J. H.; Corzana, F.; Jimenez-Oses,
G.; Peregrina, J. M. Chem. Commun. 2004, 980. (h) Attani,
M.; Wei, L.; Lubell, W. D. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 2965.
Synlett 2009, No. 8, 1227–1232 © Thieme Stuttgart · New York