aldehyde precursor, enabling asymmetric carbonyl allyl-
ation,2a,b,e crotylation,2c and reverse prenylation2d directly
from the alcohol oxidation level in the absence of any
stoichiometric organometallic reagents.
Table 1. Asymmetric Transfer Hydrogenative Carbonyl
Allylation of O-Benzyl 1,3-Propylene Glycol 1aa
In addition to the step economy associated with bypassing
discrete alcohol oxidation and the preactivation attending
stoichiometric use of chiral allylmetal reagents, the ability
to perform carbonyl allylation directly from the alcohol
oxidation level enables allylations that are not easily achieved
using aldehyde electrophiles. For example, whereas double
asymmetric allylation of 1,3-diols delivers C2-symmetric
adducts with exceptional levels of optical enrichment,2e
corresponding allyl additions employing malondialdehydes
are unknown. On the basis of this unique capability, an
iterative two-directional elongation of 1,3-diols to furnish
1,3-polyols was achieved.2e,6,7 Here, we report related one-
directional chain elongations employing monoprotected 1,3-
diols as starting materials. In all cases, high levels of catalyst-
directed enantioselectivity and diastereoselectivity are
observed.8 This protocol, which involves iterative allylation
from the alcohol oxidation level, avoids ꢀ-alkoxy aldehyde
intermediates, which are often unstable with respect to
elimination.
Our initial studies focused on the asymmetric allylation
of O-benzyl 1,3-propylene glycol 1a. Under previously
reported conditions employing the cyclometalated catalyst
generated in situ from [Ir(cod)Cl]2, (S)-Cl,MeO-BIPHEP, and
3-nitrobenzoic acid,2b the coupling of allyl acetate (1000 mol
%) to 1a at 120 °C delivers the homoallyl alcohol 2a in 82%
isolated yield and 94% enantiomeric excess (Table 1, entry
1). Lowering the reaction temperature to 100 °C slightly
enhanced the degree of optical enrichment, but decreased
the isolated yield of 2a (Table 1, entry 2). At 120 °C, a
decrease in the loading of allyl acetate from 10 to 5
equivalents diminished the isolated yield of 2a by only 8%
(Table 1, entries 1 and 3). However, upon a further decrease
in the loading of allyl acetate from 5 to 2 equivalents, the
isolated yield was unchanged (Table 1, entries 3 and 4).
Finally, using the iridium C,O-benzoate generated in situ
from [Ir(cod)Cl]2, (S)-Cl,MeO-BIPHEP and 4-chloro-3-
nitrobenzoic acid, the homoallyl alcohol 2a is obtained in
88% isolated yield and 95% enantiomeric excess (Table 1,
entry 5). As decreased reaction temperature (100 °C) or
extended reaction time (40 h) did not improve this result
(Table 1, entries 6 and 7), the latter conditions employing
temp yield
entry
acid additive
allyl acetate
°C
(%) ee (%)
1
2
3
4
3-NO2-BzOH
3-NO2-BzOH
3-NO2-BzOH
3-NO2-BzOH
1000 (mol %) 120
1000 (mol %) 100
82
76
74
74
94 (S)
96 (S)
94 (S)
95 (S)
500 (mol %)
200 (mol %)
120
120
5
6
4-Cl-3-NO2-BzOH 200 (mol %) 120
88 95 (S)
4-Cl-3-NO2-BzOH 200 (mol %)
4-Cl-3-NO2-BzOH 200 (mol %)
100
45
95 (S)
95 (S)
7b
100
79
a All reactions were performed in 13 × 100 mm pressure tubes. The
cited yields are of material isolated by silica gel chromatography and
represent the average of two runs. Enantiomeric excess was determined by
chiral stationary phase HPLC analysis. See Supporting Information for
experimental details. b The reaction was allowed to proceed for 40 h.
the catalyst modified by 4-chloro-nitrobenzoic acid at 120
°C were selected for iterative homologation of 2a to form
higher 1,3-polyols (Table 1, entry 5).
The iterative synthesis of higher 1,3-polyols requires
exceptional levels of catalyst-directed diastereoselectivity.
To explore this prospect, homoallyl alcohol 2a was converted
to the corresponding tert-butyldimethylsilyl ether 2b and
subjected to ozonolysis in methanol solvent employing a
small quantity of Sudan III as indicator (3-5 drops of a 1.5
mM solution in methanol).9 Upon complete consumption of
2b, as revealed through the change from a pink to a colorless
solution, the reaction mixture was treated with sodium
borohydride to deliver the alcohol 2c in 92% isolated yield.
Upon exposure of 2c to the allylation conditions optimized
for compound 1a (Table 1) employing the catalyst modified
by (S)-Cl,MeO-BIPHEP at 120 °C, the product of carbonyl
allylation (R,S)-3a was obtained in 55% isolated yield as a
15:1 ratio of diastereomers. By lowering the reaction
temperature to 100 °C and extending the reaction time to
40 h under otherwise identical conditions, (R,S)-3a was
obtained in 79% isolated yield as a 17:1 ratio of diastereo-
mers. Under these same conditions, but using the catalyst
modified by (R)-Cl,MeO-BIPHEP, the diastereomeric adduct
(R,R)-3a was obtained in 71% isolated yield as a 15:1 ratio
of diastereomers. Upon use of the achiral iridium catalyst
ligated by BIPHEP, (R,S)-3a and (R,R)-3a are produced in
an equimolar ratio (Scheme 1).
(6) For a review on two-directional chain elongation in target-oriented
synthesis, see: Poss, C. S.; Schreiber, S. L. Acc. Chem. Res. 1994, 27, 9
.
(7) For selected reviews of the synthesis of 1,3-diol substructures, see:
(a) Masamune, S.; Choy, W. Aldrichimica Acta 1982, 15, 47. (b) Oishi, T.;
Nakata, T. Synthesis 1990, 635. (c) Schneider, C. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
1998, 37, 1375. (d) Bode, S. E.; Wohlberg, M.; Mu¨ller, M. Synthesis 2006,
With compounds (R,S)-3a and (R,R)-3a in hand, the
stereoselective synthesis of higher homologues was under-
taken. Exposure of (R,S)-3a or (R,R)-3a to methanol in the
presence of p-toluenesulfonic acid (10 mol %) with subse-
quent introduction of 2,2-dimethoxypropane delivers the
diastereomeric acetonides (R,S)-3b and (R,R)-3b, respec-
tively, which are isolated as single diastereomers. Ozonolysis
557
.
(8) For selected examples of catalyst directed diastereoselectivity, see:
(a) Minami, N.; Ko, S. S.; Kishi, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1982, 104, 1109.
(b) Ko, S. Y.; Lee, A. W. M.; Masamune, S.; Reed, L. A., III; Sharpless,
K. B.; Walker, F. J. Science 1983, 949. (c) Kobayashi, S.; Ohtsubo, A.;
Mukaiyama, T. Chem. Lett. 1991, 831. (d) Hammadi, A.; Nuzillard, J. M.;
Poulin, J. C.; Kagan, H. B. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1992, 3, 1247. (e)
Doyle, M. P.; Kalinin, A. V.; Ene, D. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118,
8837. (f) Trost, B. M.; Calkins, T. L.; Oertelt, C.; Zambrano, J. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1998, 39, 1713. (g) Balskus, E. P.; Jacobsen, E. N. Science 2007,
317, 1736. (h) Han, S. B.; Kong, J. R.; Krische, M. J. Org. Lett. 2008, 10,
4133.
(9) Veysoglu, T.; Mitscher, L. A.; Swayze, J. K. Synthesis 1980, 807.
Org. Lett., Vol. 11, No. 14, 2009
3113