3176
K. Naganuma et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 19 (2009) 3174–3176
Table 4
Compound 33 was subjected to further biological evaluation.
Table 6 shows a summary of the results compared with Cilomilast.
Compound 33 had the same potency as Cilomilast in inhibiting
Compounds with improved inhibitory activity and selectivity
R7
H
TNF-a production in mouse peripheral blood mononuclear cells
N
(PBMC) in vitro, reflecting the same degree of activity against
PDE4B, or had an additional effect due to the PDE4D inhibiting
N
N
COOH
activity of Cilomilast. Oral activity against LPS-induced TNF-a pro-
S
duction in mice was evaluated, and it was found that compound 33
showed potential activity in this assay. We further evaluated the
inhibitory activity against neutrophil accumulation in lung in-
duced by LPS, and the emetic adverse effect in ferrets. Cilomilast
showed an effect on neutrophilia at a dose of 10 mg/kg, and vom-
iting was observed at a dose of 1 mg/kg, indicating a rather narrow
therapeutic window. Compound 33 had the same potency on neu-
trophilia, and a significantly lower emetic effect with no vomiting
at a dose of 100 mg/kg. The greater safety index of 33 is possibly
due to PDE4B selectivity over PDE4D. To the best of our knowledge,
this is the first disclosure of PDE4B inhibitors which show both
strong potency and high selectivity (>100-fold) against PDE4D. A
further exploration of these PDE4B inhibitors and their application
in COPD and other therapeutic areas is now ongoing.
R5
R6
Compound R5
R6 R7 PDE4B IC50
(nM)
PDE4D IC50
(nM)
Ratio 4D/4B
IC50
31
32
33
34
35
SCH3
Br
Cl
CH3
F
H
H
H
Br
H
H
H
H
H
F
34
19
15
6.8
15
1500
1600
1700
2900
3100
43
87
114
420
205
Table 5
Pharmacokinetic dataa for compound 33 and 35
Compound
Mice
g h/mL)
Ferret
g h/mL)
In summary, a novel class of potent, selective, and orally avail-
able PDE4B inhibitors has been developed. Biological evaluation of
the compound identified as 33 had anti-inflammatory therapeutic
potential and a wider safety margin regarding emesis.
AUCb
(
l
Cmax
(lg/mL)
AUCb
(l
Cmax (lg/mL)
33
35
52.3
21.9
8.7
10.9
33.5
340.9
4.5
14.8
a
Dosed at 2.0 mg/kg po as suspension in 0.5% methylcellulose.
AUC of 0–1.
b
Acknowledgments
The authors thank the analytical groups in the Research Center,
Asahi Kasei Pharma Corporation for analytical and spectroscopic
data. The authors thank Naoko Yamaguchi for biological
evaluation.
Table 6
Biological evaluation of compound 33
Compound
Inhibition of TNF-
production
Neutrophilia
inhibitionc
Vomiting testd
References and notes
In vitro
In vivo
In vivo, ferret
inhibition% @
Dose in ferret
(mg/kg, po),
Emetic responders
(vomiting /tested)
mice PBMCa miceb ID50
1. (a) Zhang, K. Y. J.; Ibrahim, P. N.; Gillette, S.; Bollag, G. Exp. Opin. Ther. Targets
2005, 9, 1283; (b) Burnouf, C.; Pruniaux, M.-P. Curr. Pharm. Design 2002, 8,
1255; (c) Kodimuthali, A.; Jabaris, S. S. L.; Pal, M. J. Med. Chem. 2008, 51, 5471.
2. Houslay, M. D.; Schafer, P.; Zhang, K. Y. Drug Discovery Today 2005, 10, 1503.
3. Timmer, W.; Leclerc, L.; Birraux, G.; Neuhauser, M.; Hatzelmann, A.; Bethke, T.;
Wurst, W. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2002, 42, 297.
IC50 (M)
(mg/kg, po) dose (po)
Cilomilast
0.20
2.2
35% @ 10 mg/kg
0.3, 0/6
1, 1/6
4. Christensen, S. B.; Guider, A.; Forster, C. J.; Gleason, J. G.; Bender, P. E.;
Karpinski, J. M.; DeWolf, W. E., Jr.; Barnette, M. S.; Underwood, D. C.; Griswold,
D. E.; Cieslinski, L. B.; Burman, M.; Bochnowicz, S.; Osborn, R. R.; Manning, C. D.;
Grous, M.; Hillegas, L. M.; Bartus, J. O.; Ryan, M. D.; Eggleston, D. S.;
Haltiwanger, R. C.; Torphy, T. J. J. Med. Chem. 1998, 41, 821.
10, 2/3
33
0.50
14
44% @ 12.5 mg/kg 100, 0/4
46% @ 25 mg/kg
200, 2/2
a
Inhibitory concentration on LPS-induced TNF-
a
production from mouse
5. Jin, S.-L. C.; Conti, M. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2002, 99, 7628.
6. Robichaud, A.; Stamatiou, P. B.; Jin, S.-L. C.; Lachance, N.; MacDonald, D.;
Laliberte, F.; Liu, S.; Huang, Z.; Conti, M.; Chan, C. C. J. Clin. Invest. 2002, 110,
1045.
7. Lehnart, S. E.; Wehrens, X. H. T.; Reiken, S.; Warrier, S.; Belevych, A. E.; Harvey,
R. D.; Richter, W.; Jin, S.-L. C.; Conti, M.; Marks, A. R. Cell 2005, 123, 25.
8. Srivani, P.; Usharani, D.; Jemmis, E. D.; Sastry, G. N. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2008, 14,
3854.
peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC).
b
Inhibitory dose on LPS-induced (ip) TNF-
The percentage inhibition for a change in the number of neutrophils in lung
a
production in mice.
c
lavage after LPS inhalation in ferrets.
d
Occurrence of vomiting episode after administration for 6 h.
9. Alternatively, compounds 8–11 having functionalized substituent at 5-position
of pyrimidine ring were synthesized via 1,6-dihydro-4-methyl-6-oxo-2-
phenyl-5-pyrimidine-carbonitrile described in Ellingboe, J.; Alessi, T.; Millen,
J.; Sredy, J.; King, A.; Prusiewicz, C.; Guzzo, F.; VanEngen, D.; Bagli, J. J. Med.
Chem. 1990, 33, 2892.
We then focused on optimization of 2-thienyl derivatives. After
extensive investigations to introduce a wide variety of functional
groups on the thiophene moiety and a combination with substitu-
ents on the other position, a series of compounds with highly im-
proved potency and selectivity were found. Compounds 33–35 in
Table 4 showed excellent potency on 4B and >100-fold selectivity
over 4D.11
These compounds generally showed good pharmacokinetic
properties. Examples are compounds 33 and 35 in Table 5. Bioavail-
ability of 33 and 35 in mice was 85% and 73%, respectively (data not
10. Recombinant human PDE4B1 (catalytic domain, a.a. 324–736) and human
PED4D3 (catalytic domain, a.a. 244–673) were used. Inhibitory activity of the
compounds were assayed using
10 min. The reaction was stopped by adding 25
mixture and the solution was charged on
3
l
M
cAMP with 0.83
L of trichloroacetic acid to the
neutral alumina column
l
Ci [3H]-cAMP for
l
a
equilibrated with 0.1 M of 2-[[tris(hydroxylmethyl)methyl]-amino]-1-
ethanesulfonic acid (TES) buffer (pH 8.0). After washing the column with a
sufficient amount of 0.1 M TES buffer solution, the column was eluted with 2 N
NaOH, and the radioactivity of [3H]-50AMP product was measured.
shown). Compounds 33 and 35 were not inhibitors (IC50 > 10 lM)
of CYP1A2, CYP3A4, CYP2C9, and CYP2D6 (data not shown).
11. Compound 33 showed no inhibition (IC50 > 2 lM) toward PDE 1–3, 5 and 6
(data not shown).