tions.9 The stannylated amino acids are accessible via chelate-
Claisen rearrangement of stannylated allylic esters or via Pd-
catalyzed allylic alkylation.10 The required stannylated allylic
esters can be obtained by a Mo-catalyzed regioselective
hydrostannation of the corresponding propargylic substrates
(Scheme 1).11
because the reaction conditions for these two processes are
generally different. In addition, vinylstannanes can undergo
Pd-catalyzed cross-couplings with allylic substrates,15 and
therefore oligo- and polymerizations of the stannylated allyl
compound have to be avoided. Therefore, one has to find
reaction conditions where one of the two functionalities reacts
selectively. Very recently, Fillion et al. reported a sequential
Rh(I)-catalyzed 1,4-addition of stannylated allyl carbonates
toward alkylidene Meldrum’s acids, followed by Pd-
catalyzed intramolecular allylations.16
Scheme 1. Synthesis of Stannylated Amino Acids and Peptides
Our previous work with the chelated enolates of amino
acids and peptides indicated that the stannylated allylic
acetates and carbonates react with good nucleophiles already
at low temperatures (<-20 °C), while the Stille couplings
generally occur at temperatures around 50 °C. Unfortunately,
the strong basic reaction conditions for the enolate allylation
were not compatible with the cross-coupling conditions.
Therefore, we focused our investigations on other reactive
nucleophiles allowing a selective reaction of the allyl
fragment without affecting the vinylstannane moiety. Mal-
onates, the “standard nucleophiles” in allylic alkylations, are
unsuitable candidates, reacting in a temperature range where
decomposition of the stannylated substrate is competitive
with the nucleophilic substitution. Detailed investigations
showed that the decomposition in the presence of Pd0 toward
the corresponding allenes is a fast process as determined by
in situ NMR.17
Therefore, we next switched to the more reactive amines
(Table 1) that are suitable candidates for the synthesis of
alkaloids. To avoid double allylation, we started our inves-
tigations with piperidine as nucleophile. Interestingly, no
allylation product was obtained in THF at room temperature,
although a complete consumption of allyl carbonate 1 was
observed (entry 1). Obviously the decomposition is also faster
under these conditions, but at 0 °C a good yield of coupling
product was obtained (entry 2). Obviously THF is not the
solvent of choice for these allylations, because in the more
polar DMF no decomposition was observed even at room
temperature (entry 3). The yield could be slightly increased
if the reaction was run at 0 °C (entry 4). A further
improvement was observed after switching from [Pd(allyl)Cl]2
to Pd(PPh3)4 as catalyst (entry 5). Under these optimized
conditions we investigated the allylation of several other,
also primary, amines. While dialkylation was observed with
sterically unhindered amines, this side reaction is no issue
in allylations of sterically hindered, branched amines such
as phenylethylamine (entry 6) or amino acid esters (entry
7). Even with alaninate 2c and glycinate 2d, an excellent
yield was obtained, especially if 2 equiv of the nucleophile
was used (entries 7, 8).
This Mo-catalyzed hydrostannation can be applied to a
wide range of (electron-demanding) alkynes,12 giving rise
to orthogonal functionalized substrates such as stannylated
allylic sulfones13 or phosphonates,14 which can be subjected
to a subsequent Stille coupling/olefination protocol. With
respect to DOS the stannylated esters and carbonates (1) are
especially interesting substrates, because they can be further
modified at the allylic positions via nucleophilic substitution
and at the central position via cross-coupling with electro-
philes. Both reactions can be catalyzed by Pd, and in
principle, it should be possible to combine both couplings
to a one-pot protocol. However, this is not a trivial issue,
(6) (a) Kazmaier, U. Amino Acids 1996, 11, 283–299. (b) Kazmaier, U.;
Maier, S.; Zumpe, F. L. Synlett 2000, 1523–1535. (c) Kazmaier, U. Curr.
Org. Chem. 2003, 317–328. (d) Bauer, M.; Kazmaier, U. Recent Res. DeV.
Org. Chem. 2005, 9, 49–69. (e) Deska, J.; Kazmaier, U. Chem.sEur. J.
2007, 13, 6204–6211. (f) Deska, J.; Kazmaier, U. Curr. Org. Chem. 2008,
355–385.
(7) Deska, J.; Kazmaier, U. Angew. Chem. 2007, 119, 4654–4657;
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 4570-4573.
(8) Stille, J. K. Angew. Chem. 1986, 98, 504–519; Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. Engl. 1986, 25, 508-524.
(9) (a) Crisp, G. T.; Glink, P. T. Tetrahedron Lett. 1992, 33, 4649–
4652. (b) Crisp, G. T.; Glink, P. T. Tetrahedron 1994, 50, 3213–3234. (c)
Do¨rrenba¨cher, S.; Kazmaier, U.; Ruf, S. Synlett 2006, 547–550.
(10) (a) Kazmaier, U.; Schauss, D.; Pohlman, M.; Raddatz, S. Synthesis
2000, 914–916. (b) Kazmaier, U.; Schauss, D.; Raddatz, S.; Pohlman, M.
Chem.sEur. J. 2001, 7, 456–464.
(11) (a) Kazmaier, U.; Schauss, D.; Pohlman, M. Org. Lett. 1999, 1,
1017–1019. (b) Kazmaier, U.; Pohlman, M.; Schauss, D. Eur. J. Org. Chem.
2000, 2761–2766. (c) Braune, S.; Kazmaier, U. J. Organomet. Chem. 2002,
641, 26–29. (d) Wesquet, A. O.; Do¨rrenba¨cher, S.; Kazmaier, U. Synlett
2006, 1105–1109.
(15) (a) Valle, L. D.; Stille, J. K.; Hegedus, L. S. J. Org. Chem. 1990,
55, 3019–3023. (b) Castano, A. M.; Ruano, M.; Echavarren, A. M.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37, 6591–6594. (c) Shirakawa, E.; Yamasaki, K.;
Yoshida, H.; Hiyama, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 10221–10222. (d)
Aubele, D. L.; Wan, S.; Floreancig, P. E. Angew. Chem. 2005, 117, 3551–
3554; Angew Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 3485-3488. (e) Snyder, S. A.;
Corey, E. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 740–742.
(12) (a) Kazmaier, U.; Lucas, S.; Klein, M. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71,
2429–2433. (b) Lin, H.; Kazmaier, U. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 2839–
2843. (c) Kazmaier, U.; Do¨rrenba¨cher, S.; Wesquet, A.; Lucas, S.;
Kummeter, M. Synthesis 2007, 320–326. (d) Lin, H.; KazmaierU. Eur. J.
Org. Chem. 2009, in press.
´
(16) Fillion, E.; Carret, S.; Mercier, L. G.; Tre´panier, V. E. Org. Lett.
2008, 10, 437–440.
(13) Kazmaier, U.; Wesquet, A. Synlett 2005, 1271–1274.
(17) Wesquet, A. O.; Kazmaier, U. Angew. Chem. 2008, 120, 3093–
3096; Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 3050-3053.
(14) Jena, N.; Kazmaier, U. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 3852–3858.
Org. Lett., Vol. 11, No. 15, 2009
3519