Published on Web 07/31/2009
A Catalytic, Brønsted Base Strategy for Intermolecular Allylic
C-H Amination
Sean A. Reed, Anthony R. Mazzotti, and M. Christina White*
Department of Chemistry, Roger Adams Laboratory, UniVersity of Illinois,
Urbana, Illinois 61801
Received May 14, 2009; E-mail: white@scs.uiuc.edu
Abstract: A Brønsted base activation mode for oxidative, Pd(II)/sulfoxide-catalyzed, intermolecular C-H
allylic amination is reported. N,N-diisopropylethylamine was found to promote amination of unactivated
terminal olefins, forming the corresponding linear allylic amine products with high levels of stereo-, regio-,
and chemoselectivity. The predictable and high selectivity of this C-H oxidation method enables late-
stage incorporation of nitrogen into advanced synthetic intermediates and natural products.
branched6 or linear7 allylic amines directly from terminal olefins
with predictable and high regioselectivities.8 Moreover, we have
Introduction
The ubiquitous C-H bond has emerged as a viable precursor
to many functional groups through several transition metal-
catalyzed reactions.1 The practical utility of such reactions for
complex molecule synthesis is governed by their ability to
operate with predictable and high levels of chemo-, stereo-,
regio- and site selectivity. The strategic application of selective
C-H oxidation reactions at late stages of syntheses has been
demonstrated to increase product diversity1d as well as eliminate
functional group interconversions and/or oxidation state changes,
which are often required when working with oxidized interme-
diates.2
demonstrated that direct installation of nitrogen functionality
from C-H bonds can have a powerful streamlining effect on
synthetic routes. For example, the intermolecular C-H to C-N
bond-forming route to a rigidified (+)-deoxynegamycin ana-
logue proceeded with five fewer steps, five fewer FGM, and a
higher overall yield than the alternative C-O to C-N bond-
forming route.7 Despite this, the intermolecular allylic C-H
amination reaction suffered from several limitations associated
with the requirement for a Lewis acid activator [Cr(salen)Cl 2]
to effect functionalization. Incompatibilities with Lewis basic
functionality, and isomerization of terminal olefins on electron-
deficient substrates could limit the applicability of this otherwise
useful and general method. With the goal of further developing
this significant transformation, herein we report a novel nu-
cleophile activation strategy for promoting intermolecular allylic
C-H amination that operates Via electrophilic Pd(II) catalysis
The prevalence of nitrogen functionality in biologically
important small molecules, accompanied by the extensive
functional group manipulations (FGM) commonly employed to
install nitrogen, underscores the utility of direct C-H to C-N
bond transformations.3 For example, routine synthesis of linear
allylic amines involves oxidative, nucleophilic, and often
reductive conditions to access the requisite allylic alcohol, which
is generally converted into a leaving group before displacement
with nitrogen.4,5 We recently reported Pd(II)/bis-sulfoxide-
catalyzed allylic C-H amination reactions that furnish either
(3) Aliphatic/benzylic: (a) Liang, C.; Collet, F.; Peillard, F. R.; Mu¨ller,
P.; Dodd, R. H.; Dauban, P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 130, 343. (b)
Lebel, H.; Huard, K.; Lectard, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 14198.
(c) Olson, D. E.; Du Bois, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 11248. (d)
Milczek, E.; Boudet, N.; Blakey, S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47,
6825. Aryl: (e) Li, J. J.; Mei, T. S.; Yu, J.-Q. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2008, 47, 6452. (f) Jordan-Hore, J. A.; Johansson, C. C. C.; Gulias,
M.; Beck, E. M.; Gaunt, M. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 16184.
(g) Thu, H.-Y.; Yu, W.-Y.; Che, C.-M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128,
9048. (h) Tsang, W. C.; Zheng, N.; Buchwald, S. L. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2005, 127, 14560. (i) Brasche, G.; Buchwald, S. L. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 1932.
(4) Linear allylic amination Via oxygenated intermediates: Pd(0) catalysis.
(a) Trost, B. M.; Keinan, E. J. Org. Chem. 1979, 44, 3451. Overman
rearrangement. (b) Overman, L. E. Acc. Chem. Res. 1980, 13, 218.
Mitsunobu amination. (c) Mulzer, J.; Funk, G. Synthesis 1995, 1, 101.
(5) Amination reviews: (a) Cheikh, R. B.; Chaabouni, R, Synthesis 1983,
9, 685. (b) Johannsen, M.; Jørgensen, K. A. Chem. ReV. 1998, 98,
1689.
(1) (a) Muller, P.; Fruit, C. Chem. ReV. 2003, 103, 2905. (b) Dick, A. R.;
Sanford, M. S. Tetrahedron 2006, 62, 2439, and references therein.
(c) Alberico, D.; Scott, M. E.; Lautens, M. Chem. ReV. 2007, 107,
174. (d) Chen, M. S.; White, M. C. Science 2007, 318, 783. (e) Davies,
H. M. L.; Manning, J. R. Nature 2008, 451, 417. (f) Lewis, J. C.;
Bergman, R. G.; Ellman, J. A. Acc. Chem. Res. 2008, 41, 1013. (g)
Labinger, J. A.; Bercaw, J. E. Nature 2002, 417, 507. (h) Crabtree,
R. H. J. Organomet. Chem. 2004, 689, 4083.
(6) Fraunhoffer, K. J.; White, M. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 7274.
(7) Reed, S. A.; White, M. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 3316.
(8) For seminal work on allylic CsH amination see: Pd(II). (a) Larock,
R. C.; Hightower, T. R.; Hasvold, L. A.; Peterson, K. P. J. Org. Chem.
1996, 61, 3584. Nitrenes. (b) References 3a-d. Ene reactions. (c)
Kalita, B.; Nicholas, K. M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2005, 46, 1451.
(2) (a) Fraunhoffer, K. J.; Bachovchin, D. A.; White, M. C. Org. Lett.
2005, 7, 223. (b) Hoffmann, R. W. Synthesis 2006, 21, 3531. (c)
Covell, D. J.; Vermeulen, N. A.; Labenz, N. A.; White, M. C. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 8217.
9
10.1021/ja903939k CCC: $40.75 2009 American Chemical Society
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. 2009, 131, 11701–11706 11701