516 J ournal of Natural Products, 2000, Vol. 63, No. 4
Notes
Varian Unity-400 spectrometer, and MS were obtained on a
J MS-HX 100 mass spectrometer.
5.6 Hz, H-3â), 4.75 (1H, s, H-26), 5.08 (1H, t, J ) 6.8 Hz, H-23),
5.56 (1H, d, J ) 7.2 Hz, H-1′); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz),
see Table 1; FABMS (positive) m/z 665 [M + Na]+ (14), 551
(12), 543 (10), 311 (9), 237 (16), 193 (11), 108 (100); HRFABMS
(positive) m/z 643.3791 [M + 1]+ (calcd for C38H58O8, 643.4210).
F u n ga l Ma ter ia l. G. tsugae was collected at Liu-Kuei
Shian, Kaohsiung Hsien, Taiwan, Republic of China, during
J uly 1995. A voucher specimen (9501) is deposited in the
laboratory of Medicinal Chemistry. It was identified by Dr.
Ming-Hong Yen, School of Pharmacy, Kaohsiung Medical
University. Compounds 5-8 and 10 were isolated and identi-
fied as reported previously.1 Compound 8 was acetylated using
Ac2O in pyridine, and 7 was hydrolyzed in methanolic 5% KOH
to give 9 and 11, respectively.
Extr a ction a n d Isola tion . Air-dried fruit bodies (10 kg)
were extracted with CHCl3 and MeOH, respectively. The
MeOH extract was chromatographed on a Si gel column, and
elution with cyclohexane-CH2Cl2 (1:4) yielded a mixture of
5R,8R-epidioxyergosta-6,22-dien-3â-ol and 5R,8R-epidioxyer-
gosta-6,9(11),22-trien-3â-ol (25 mg, 0.0005%). Elution with
CH2Cl2-EtOAc (3:2) afforded 1 (20 mg, 0.0004%), 2 (10 mg,
0.0002%), and 4 (15 mg, 0.0003%). The known compounds were
identified by spectroscopic methods and comparison with
reported data.9,10
Tu m or Cell Gr ow th In h ibition Assa ys. A microassay for
cytotoxicity was performed using a MTT (3-[4,5-dimethyl-
thiazo-2-yl]-5-[3-carboxymethoxy-methoxyphenyl]- 2[4-sul-
fophenyl]-2H-tetrazolium bromide) assay.11,12 Briefly, 1-3 ×
103 cells/100 µL were seeded in 96-well microplates (Nunck,
Roskilde, Denmark) and preincubated for 6 h to allow cell
attachment. This medium was then aspirated, and 100 µL of
fresh medium containing various concentrations of test drug
were added to the cultures. The cells were incubated with each
drug for 6 days. Cell survival was evaluated by adding 10 µL
of tetrazolium salt solution (1 mg MTT/mL in PBS). After 4 h
incubation at 37 °C, 100 µL DMSO were added to dissolve the
precipitate of reduced MTT. Microplates were then shaken for
15 min, and the absorbance was determined at 550 nm with
a multiwell scanning spectrophotometer (Dynex MR 5000,
Chantilly, VA).
Tsu ga r ic a cid C (1): colorless needles (MeOH); mp 213-
215 °C; IR (KBr) νmax 3465, 1730, 1656 cm-1; 1H NMR [(CD3)2-
CO, 400 MHz] δ 0.80 (3H, s, Me-18), 0.86 (3H, s, Me-28), 0.91
(3H, s, Me-29), 0.94 (3H, s, Me-30), 1.03 (3H, s, Me-19), 1.67
(3H, s, Me-27), 2.00 (3H, s, OAc), 2.26 (1H, m, H-20), 3.75 (1H,
br s, OH-24), 4.01 (1H, m, H-24), 4.61 (1H, br s, H-3), 4.75,
4.89 (1H, br s, H-27 of 24R,24S), 4.75, 4.92 (1H, br s, H-27 of
24R,24S); 13C NMR [(CD3)2CO, 100 MHz], see Table 1; EIMS
m/z 514 [M]+ (8), 496 (3), 481 (9), 421 (54), 281 (17), 187 (39),
81 (66), 69 (58), 43 (100); HREIMS m/z 514.3662 (calcd for
PLC/PRF/5 cells were established from a human hepatoma
and known to produce HBs Ag continuously in culture fluids.13
Human hepatoma PLC/PRF/5, T24 cells, human cervical
carcinoma, HT-3, SiHa, and CaSki cells were maintained in
Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM; Gibco BRL,
Grand Island, NY)11,12 containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS;
Gibco BRL), 2 mM L-glutamine, 100 u/mL penicillin, and 100
µg/mL streptomycin. The 212 cells (an inducible Ha-ras onco-
gene transformed NIH/3T3 cell line) were maintained in
minimum essential alpha medium (MEM; Gibco BRL), con-
taining 10% calf serum (Gibco BRL), and antibiotics.14 For the
microassay, the growth medium was supplemented with 10
mM HEPES buffer pH 7.3 and incubated at 37 °C in a CO2
incubator.
C
32H50O5, 514.3658).
Tsu ga r iosid e B (2): colorless needles (CHCl3); mp 135-
137 °C; [R]27 +7.6° (c 0.1, CHCl3); IR (KBr) νmax 3425, 1745,
D
1
1645 cm-1; H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ 0.71 (3H, s, Me-18),
0.86 (3H, s, Me-28), 0.91 (3H, s, Me-29), 0.92 (3H, s, Me-30),
0.99 (3H, s, Me-19), 1.60 (3H, s, Me-26), 1.67 (3H, s, Me-27),
2.07 (3H, s, OAc), 2.33 (1H, m, H-20), 4.39 (1H, d, J ) 7.2 Hz,
Ack n ow led gm en t. This work was supported by a grant
from the National Science Council of the Republic of China
(NSC 85-2331-B037-021)
H-1′), 4.66 (1H, br s, H-3â), 5.09 (1H, t, J ) 6.8 Hz, H-24); 13
C
NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz), see Table 1; FABMS (positive) m/z
617 [M + 1]+ (0.2), 413 (3), 391 (12), 154 (39), 149 (100).
Red u ction of 7 w ith LiAlH 4. Compound 7 (0.06 mmol)
was dissolved in anhydrous THF (5 mL). LiAlH4 (0.6 mmol)
was added to this solution, and the mixture was refluxed for
24 h. The excess LiAlH4 was decomposed with wet diethyl
ether, and the mixture was extracted with diethyl ether. The
diethyl ether layer was washed with H2O, dried over MgSO4,
and evaporated to dryness. The residue was chromatographed
on a Si gel column, and by elution with CHCl3, afforded 4 (0.02
Refer en ces a n d Notes
(1) Lin, C. N.; Fann, Y. F.; Chung, M. I. Phytochemistry 1997, 46, 1143-
1146.
(2) Gan, K. H.; Fann, Y. F.; Hsu, S. H.; Kuo, K. W.; Lin, C. N. J . Nat.
Prod. 1998, 61, 485-487.
(3) Kitajima, J .; Kimizuka, K.; Tanaka, Y. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1998,
46, 1408-1411.
(4) Wright, J . L. C.; McInnes, A. G.; Shimizu, S.; Smith, D. G.; Walter,
J . A. Can. J . Chem. 1978, 56, 1898-1903.
(5) Shiao, M. S.; Lin, L. J .J . Nat. Prod. 1987, 50, 886-890.
(6) Lou, H.; Li, X.; Onda, M.; Konda, Y.; Machida, T.; Toda, Y.; Harigaya,
Y. J . Nat. Prod. 1993, 56, 1437-1443.
mmol) as colorless needles (CHCl3): mp 71-72 °C; [R]27
D
-12.7° (c 0.3, CHCl3); IR (KBr) νmax 3965 (OH), 1656 (CdC);
1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ 0.71 (3H, s, Me-18), 0.87 (3H, s,
Me-28), 0.89 (3H, s, Me-29), 0.90 (3H, s, Me-30), 0.98 (3H, s,
Me-19), 1.61 (3H, s, Me-26), 1.68 (3H, s, Me-27), 3.43 (1H, br
s, H-3), 3.71 (2H, m, H-21), 5.11 (1H, m, H-24); 13C NMR
(CDCl3, 100 MHz), see Table 1; EIMS m/z 442 [M]+ (3), 427
[M - CH3]+ (4), 409 [427 - H2O]+ (7), 281 [m/z 409 - side
chain - H]+ (4), 255 (5), 187 (13), 109 (96), 69 (100); HREIMS
m/z 442.3789 (calcd for C30H50O2, 442.3811).
(7) Agrawal, P. K. Phytochemistry 1992, 31, 3307-3330.
(8) Houghton, P. J .; Lian, L. M. Phytochemistry 1986, 25, 1939-1944.
(9) Gunatilaka, A. A. L.; Gopichand, Y.; Schmitz, F. J .; Djerassi, C. J .
Org. Chem. 1981, 46, 3860-3866.
(10) Miyamoto, T.; Honda, M.; Sugiyama, S.; Higuchi, R.; Komori, T.
Liebigs Ann. Chem. 1988, 589-592.
(11) Carmicheal, J .; Mitchell, J . B.; DeGraff, W. G.; Gamson, J .; Gazdar,
A. F.; J ohnson, B. E.; Glatstein, E.; Minna, J . D. Br. J . Cancer 1988,
57, 540-547.
(12) Tsai, C. M.; Gazdar, A. F.; Venzon, D. J .; Steinberg, S. M.; Dedrick,
R. L.; Mulshine, J . L.; Kramer, B. S. Cancer Res. 1989, 49, 2390-
2392.
Tsu ga r iosid e C (3): colorless needles (CHCl3); mp 181-
183 °C; [R]27 +10° (c 0.1, CHCl3); IR (KBr) νmax 3445, 1745,
D
(13) Nakajima, Y.; Kuwata, T.; Nomita, Y.; Okuda, K. Microbiol. Immunol.
1982, 26, 705-712.
(14) Liu, H. S.; Scrable, H.; Villaret, D. B.; Lieberman, M. A.; Stambrook,
P. J . Cancer Res. 1992, 52, 983-989.
1720, 1656 cm-1
;
1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ 0.74 (3H, s,
Me-18), 0.86 (3H, s, Me-28), 0.91 (3H, s, Me-29), 0.93 (3H, s,
Me-30), 0.97 (3H, s, Me-19), 1.57 (3H, s, Me-27), 1.67 (3H, s,
Me-241), 2.06 (3H, s, OAc), 4.65 (1H, s, H-26), 4.66, (1H, t, J )
NP990367L