Table 1. Catalyst Development for N-H Insertion of Aniline
with Sulfoxonium Ylide 1a
Table 2. X-H Insertion Reactions of Ylide 1a
entry
R
X
product
yield (%)b
entry
catalyst
Rh2(OAc)4
mol %b
solvent
yield (%)c
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Ph
NH
NH
NH
NH
NMe
NH
O
O
O
S
2a
2b
2c
2d
2e
2f
2g
2h
2i
91
93
76
85
89c
82
p-FC6H4
p-MeOC6H4
p-CF3C6H4
Ph
2-naphthyl
Et
i-Pr
TMSCH2CH2
Ph
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
5
5
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
toluene
toluene
toluene
toluene
toluene
toluene
toluene
THF
DMF
CH2Cl2
DCE
CH2Cl2
CH2Cl2
7
22
12
55
66
59
85
79
77
91
90
84
78
Rh2(TFA)4
[Ru(cym)Cl2]2
RuCl2(PPh3)3
RuCl2(Cp)(PPh3)2
RuCl2(DMSO)4
[Ir(COD)Cl]2
[Ir(COD)Cl]2
[Ir(COD)Cl]2
[Ir(COD)Cl]2
[Ir(COD)Cl]2
Ir(COD)2BF4
86d e
,
63f
73d
80
10
2j
a All reactions conducted at 0.1 M at 23 °C for 4-18 h in degassed
CH2Cl2 under nitrogen using 2.0 equiv of nucleophile except where noted.
b Isolated yield. c Reaction conducted at 70 °C using DCE as solvent.
d Reaction conducted at 35 °C. e Performed in neat EtOH. f Performed in
neat i-PrOH at 80 °C.
Ir(COD) BArF
2
a All reactions conducted at 0.1 M at 23 °C for 10 h in degassed solvent
under nitrogen. b Catalyst loading. c Isolated yield.
insertion of substituted anilines (76-93% yield, entries 2-4).
A secondary aniline also afforded good yield of the desired
R-amino ester (2e, entry 5), though only with elevated
temperature.12 Alcohols perform well in analogous O-H
insertions; surprisingly, these reactions can be performed in
neat alcohol as solvent for optimal conversion (63-86%
yield, entries 7-9). S-H insertion was also demonstrated
in high yield with thiophenol (80% yield, entry 10). In a
similar fashion, ꢀ-keto sulfoxonium ylide 3 can engage in
N-H or O-H insertion processes (eq 1).
occurring. We suspected that DMSO, the byproduct of
sulfoxonium ylide decomposition, was inhibiting rhodium
catalysis.8 This idea was confirmed by control experiments
in which addition of 25 mol % DMSO was sufficient to
suppress reactivity in reactions catalyzed by Rh2(OAc)4 or
Rh2(TFA)4. To overcome this deactivation pathway, we
began screening a variety of metals to find a more robust
catalyst system.9 Ruthenium-based catalysts afforded higher
yields at a lower loading (12-66% yield, entries 3-6).10
Notably, RuCl2(DMSO)4 was a competent catalyst, perhaps
supporting the idea that resistance to DMSO deactivation is
key to ruthenium activity. Surprisingly, even better results
were obtained with an iridium catalyst, [Ir(COD)Cl]2, in
noncoordinating solvents such as CH2Cl2 (91% yield, entry
10). Alternative iridium(I) catalysts afforded comparable
conversion (78-84% yield, entries 12 and 13). This repre-
sents a rare instance of iridium catalysis in carbene catalysis
and the first instance we have found where iridium has been
shown to mediate an N-H bond insertion.11
Efforts were then dedicated toward demonstrating other
carbene transformations such as C-H insertion and cyclo-
propanation.13 Ylides 1 and 3 were subjected to a range of
alkanes and alkenes with known reactivity in R-diazocarbonyl
chemistry.14 However, neither of the desired transformations
was ever observed. To simplify the problem, ꢀ-keto sul-
foxonium ylide 5 was synthesized to probe for intramolecular
reactivity. It was expected that the comparative lability of
A range of nucleophiles was evaluated in the iridium-
catalyzed decomposition of 1 (Table 2). Both electron-
withdrawing and -donating groups are tolerated in the N-H
(8) Modulation of metal carbene reactivity by coordinating solvents has
been observed previously. See, for example: Nelson, T. D.; Song, Z. J.;
Thompson, A. S.; Zhao, M.; DeMarco, A.; Reamer, M. A.; Huntington,
M. F.; Grabowski, E. J. J.; Reider, P. J. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 1877.
(9) Production of DMSO during the reaction was confirmed by 1H
NMR.
(12) Aliphatic amines did not react under these conditions and suppressed
catalyst activity for other substrates.
(13) For C-H insertion of iridium complexes, see: (a) Liu, F.; Goldman,
A. S. Chem. Commun. 1999, 2273. (b) Kawamura, K.; Hartwig, J. F. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 8422. (c) Whited, M. T.; Grubbs, R. H. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2008, 130, 5874. (d) Romero, P. E.; Whited, M. T.; Grubbs, R. H.
Organometallics 2008, 27, 3422. (e) Boebel, T. A.; Hartwig, J. F. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 7534.
(10) For Ru-based carbene catalysis, see: (a) Nishiyana, H.; Itoh, Y.;
Matsumoto, H.; Park, S.-B.; Itoh, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 2223.
(b) Del Zotto, A.; Baratta, W.; Rigo, P. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1
1999, 3079. (c) Deng, Q.-H.; Xu, H.-W.; Yuen, A. W.-H.; Xu, Z.-J.; Che,
C.-M. Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 1529.
(14) (a) Doyle, M. P.; Protopopova, M. N. Tetrahedron 1998, 54, 7919.
(b) Nishiyama, H.; Itoh, Y.; Sugawara, Y.; Matsumoto, H.; Aoki, K.; Itoh,
K. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1995, 68, 1247. (c) Kennedy, M.; McKervey,
M. A.; Maguire, A. R.; Roos, G. H. P. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun.
1997, 983.
(11) For Ir-catalyzed cyclopropanation or polymerization, see also: (a)
Kanchiku, S.; Suematsu, H.; Matsumoto, K.; Uchida, T.; Katsuki, T. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 3889. (b) Xiao, X.-Q.; Jin, G.-X. J. Organomet.
Chem. 2008, 693, 3363.
Org. Lett., Vol. 11, No. 16, 2009
3567