X. Yu, et al.
Bioorganic&MedicinalChemistryLetters30(2020)127528
Table 3
280 nm. By the increasing the concentration of compound 9e (0.33 to
3.66 μM), or 11d (0.16 to 1.83 μM) in the mixture system, the fluor-
escence intensity of α-glucosidase was quenched gradually without any
distinct shift at maximum peak wavelength. It was suggested that the
two compounds may interact with α-glucosidase.
α-Glucosidase inhibitory activities of compounds 11.
Compound
R2
10
/
20.98
0.79
5.81
11a
121.05
To gain insights into the nature of the interactions between the
compounds and the enzyme, the fluorescence quenching plots of 9e and
11b
11c
11d
11e
30.85
11.91
0.57
1.86
0.54
0.85
0.01
0.01
11d were modeled with the well-known Stern-Volmer equation20,22
,
and inserted into upper right corner of the Fig. 3A and B respectively.
gradually with rising temperature (Table 4), suggesting that a static
Kq values of 9e (2.27 × 1012,1.95 × 1012, 1.64 × 1012 L mol−1 s−1 at
11f
15.65
24.89
25.35
0.41
0.16
0.04
298, 304 and 310 K, respectively) and 11d (2.98 × 1012, 2.59 × 1012
,
11g
11h
2.24 × 1012 L mol−1 s−1 at 298, 304 and 310 K, respectively) binding
to α-glucosidase were two order of magnitude greater than the maximal
scatter collision quenching constant (2.0 × 1010 L mol−1 s−1), in-
dicating that the fluorescence of α-glucosidase was quenched by 9e and
11d through a static quenching mechanism. At the same temperatures,
the Ksv values of 11d were slightly higher than those of 9e, indicating
that the former had stronger impact on the fluorescence quenching of
α-glucosidase.
11i
25.18
27.61
0.06
0.21
Additionally, the quenching process was further analyzed using the
double-logarithm equation20. As show in Table 4, the values of Ka were
in the order of 104 Lmol−1, indicating a moderate binding affinity of
compound 9e or 11d with α-glucosidase. Furthermore, the value of Ka
was inversely correlated with temperature, suggesting that the stability
of the compound-α-glucosidase complex decreased at a higher tem-
perature. In addition, the value of n (approximately 1) further con-
firmed the existence of only one binding site for compound 9e or 11d
11k
11L
20.55
0.38
a
Values are the mean
SD. All experiments were performed at least three
times.
In order to further clarify the binding forces between the inhibitor
using the van’t Hoff equations:20 As revealed in Table 4, the negative
between α-glucosidase and 9e or 11d occurred spontaneously. The
negative H0 suggested that the binding of α-glucosidase with 9e or
11d were exothermic process. In addition, the positive values of S0
were typical proof for the system becoming more disordered during the
formation of the 9e or 11d - α-glucosidase complex. The values of
negative H0 and positive S0 also suggested that hydrophobic inter-
actions and hydrogen bonds contributed dominantly to the formation
and stabilization of the enzyme - inhibitor complex.24
In the series 10 and 11 (compounds 11a-11L) as shown in Table 3,
activity, wherein compound 11d is by far the most potent one with
IC50 = 0.57
0.01 μM. The results clearly indicate that iodomethyl
group for R2 is a breakthrough in this SAR study. Also, the introduction
of the bromine atom on the 3-phenyl and the methyl group on the 5-
phenyl ring are found to be beneficial to increase the potency.
To analyze the type of α-glucosidase inhibition exerted by the
acetylphenol derivatives, the enzyme kinetic studies of compounds 9e
and 11d were performed by using Lineweaver-Burk plots study. As
display in Fig. 2, compounds 9e and 11d inhibit α-glucosidase in the
direction of the horizontal axis and the value of Vmax decreases,
whereas −1/Km (horizontal axis intercept) is constant with increasing
concentrations of the inhibitors. And the replots of slope and Y-inter-
cept versus [9e] (or [11d]) were linear. These results indicated that the
acetylphenol derivatives bound to one or a class of inhibition sites
around the substrate site of α-glucosidase20,21. Moreover, the inhibitory
constant (Ki) values of compounds 9e and 11d for α-glucosidase were
The synchronous fluorescence was introduced to reflect the change
of the polarity microenvironment around the tyrosine (Tyr) and tryp-
tophan (Trp) residues when the D-value (Δλ) between excitation and
emission wavelength was stabilized at 15 or 60 nm, respectively.22 The
fluorescence intensities of Trp decreased more obviously than that of
Tyr after addition of compound 9e or 11d (Fig. 4), implying that the
two inhibitors may quench α-glucosidase fluorescence mainly by
quenching the fluorescence of Trp residue. The maximum emission
wavelength of Tyr or Trp residue did not show any shift (Fig. 4A and B),
displayed no discernable change during the binding process of 9e. In
contrast, the maximum emission wavelength of Tyr had a red shift from
290 to 294 nm as the concentration of 11d increased (Fig. 4C), while
that of Trp exhibited a blue shift from 286 to 282 nm (Fig. 4D). The blue
phobicity around the Trp residue increased and thus Try residue was
less exposed to the solvent.25
calculated as 1.62
0.31 and 0.65
0.15 μM, respectively. The
inhibition ability of the two compounds against α-glucosidase de-
termined by the values of Ki was consistent with the results of the en-
zyme activity assay.
As presented in Fig. 3, the compounds 9e and 11d show very weak
cence emission peak at 337 nm after being excited at a wavelength of
5