in the asymmetric epoxidation, affording the epoxide product
in an 89% yield and 46% ee (Table 1, entry 3). However,
MnII(R,R-mcp) only gave rise to 26% ee in the asymmetric
epoxidation of styrene (Table 1, entry 5) under the same
conditions. Chalcone was also selected as a model substrate;
78% ee was observed using complex 6 as catalyst (Table 1,
entry 8). This is a great improvement in enantioselectivity
compared to those displayed by the system with previously
reported chiral bioinspired manganese catalysts.6-8
epoxidized with higher enantioselectivities (Table 2, entry
6, up to 63% ee) than previously reported, although ee values
still fall short of synthetically useful levels.6a,7,8
To further demonstrate the substrate scope and the potential
for the asymmetric bioinspired epoxidation, the enantioselective
epoxidation of a variety of R,ꢀ-unsaturated ketones was also
evaluated by using complex 6 under the same conditions. As
summarized in Table 3, the reactions proceeded efficiently and
Encouraged by these preliminary results, the catalysis of
the enantioselective epoxidation of a variety of unfunction-
alized olefins was then investigated by using complex 6 with
H2O2/AcOH oxidant (Table 2). For most tested substrates,
Table 3. Asymmetric Epoxidation of R,ꢀ-Enones Catalyzed by
Complexes 6a
Table 2. Asymmetric Epoxidation of Unfunctionalized Olefins
Catalyzed by Complexes 6a
entry
R1
R2
yieldb
eec
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Ph
Ph
Ph
Ph
Ph
Ph
p-Cl-C6H4
o-Cl-C6H4
o-Br-C6H4
p-Me-C6H4
p-F-C6H4
Ph
Ph
91 (10a)
63 (10b)
82 (10c)
89 (10d)
72 (10e)
52 (10f)
89 (10g)
87 (10h)
87 (10i)
72 (10j)
94 (10k)
90 (10l)
94 (10m)
78 (2R,3S)
76 (2R,3S)
86 (2R,3S)
72 (2R,3S)
80 (2R,3S)
70 (2R,3S)
85 (2R,3S)
86 (2R,3S)
89 (2R,3S)
85 (2R,3S)
81 (2R,3S)
82
p-MeO-C6H4
p-NO2-C6H4
p-Cl-C6H4
p-Me-C6H4
2-naphthyl
Ph
Ph
Ph
Ph
Ph
9
10
11
12
13
p-F-C6H4
p-Me-C6H4
p-F-C6H4
79
a Reactions were carried out in 1.5 mL of MeCN for 60 min at room
temperature with 0.25 mmol of substrates, 1 mol % complex 6, 6 equiv of
H2O2, and 5 equiv of AcOH. b Isolated yield. c Determined by HPLC with
a Daicel chiral column (for details see Supporting Information).
rapidly to give the corresponding epoxides in >80% yields with
moderate to excellent enantioselectivities for most cases (70-89%
ee). Clearly, the substituted groups of different electronic
characters on the phenyl ring of the carbonyl side influenced
the reaction activities and enantioselectivities (Table 3, entries
1-6). Substitution by the p-NO2 group led to a considerable
improvement, and 86% ee was obtained (Table 3, entry 3).
However, the more hindered 2-naphthyl derivative could be
converted to the corresponding epoxy ketone in both low yield
and ee. The substituted groups on the phenyl ring of the olefin
side were also investigated under the identical conditions. The
highest ee values were obtained in the epoxidation of o-Br-
substituted chalcone (Table 3, entry 9, 89% ee).
a Reactions were carried out in 1.5 mL of MeCN for 90 min at room
temperature with 0.25 mmol of substrate, 1 mol % complex 6, 6 equiv of
H2O2, and 5 equiv of AcOH. b Epoxide yields determined by GC with an
internal standard. c Determined by GC with a CP-Chirasil-Dex-CB column.
d Isolated yield and ee value are determined by HPLC with a Daicel OD
column.
good epoxidation yields were achieved, and unfunctionalized
olefins such as 6-cyano-2,2-dimethylchromene are generally
(9) (a) Sun, W.; Wang, H. W.; Xia, C. G.; Li, J. W.; Zhao, P. Q. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 1042. (b) Cheng, Q. G.; Deng, F. G.; Xia, C. G.;
Sun, W. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2008, 19, 2359.
(10) Recent examples in asymmetric epoxidation of R,ꢀ-enones: (a) Lu,
X. J.; Liu, Y.; Sun, B. F.; Cindric, B.; Deng, L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008,
130, 8134. (b) Ooi, T.; Ohara, D.; Tamura, M.; Maruoka, K. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2004, 126, 6844. (c) Wang, X. W.; Shi, L.; Li, M. X.; Ding, K. L.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 6362. (d) Li, Y. W.; Liu, X. Y.; Yang,
Y. Q.; Zhao, G. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 288. (e) Nemoto, T.; Ohshima,
T.; Yamaguchi, K.; Shibasaki, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 2725. (f)
Wang, X. W.; Reisinger, C. M.; List, B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130,
6070. (g) Reisinger, C. M.; Wang, X. W.; List, B. Angew Chem. Int. Ed.
2008, 47, 8112. (h) Lu, J.; Xu, Y. H.; Liu, F.; Loh, T.-P. Tetrahedron Lett.
2008, 49, 6007.
(6) For recent biomimetic asymmetric epoxidation example, see: (a)
Gelalcha, F. G.; Bitterlich, B.; Anilkumar, G.; Tse, M.-K.; Beller, M. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 7293. (b) Gelalcha, F. G.; Anilkumar, G.; Tse,
M.-K.; Bru¨ckner, A.; Beller, M. Chem.sEur. J. 2008, 14, 7687. (c) Marchi-
Delapierre, C.; Jorge-Robin, A.; Thibon, A.; Me´nage, S. Chem. Commun.
2007, 1166.
(7) Go´mez, L.; Garcia-Bosch, I.; Company, A.; Sala, X.; Fontrodona,
X.; Ribas, X.; Costas, M. Dalton Trans. 2007, 5539.
(8) Guillemot, G.; Neuburger, M.; Pfaltz, A. Chem.sEur. J. 2007, 13,
8960.
3624
Org. Lett., Vol. 11, No. 16, 2009