142
E.A. Manoel et al. / Journal of Molecular Catalysis B: Enzymatic 87 (2013) 139–143
when compared to our previous result using vinyl acetate (Entry
8, Table 1), show lower conversion and selectivity. In TBME, ethyl
acetate as acylating agent led to very low conversion and moderate
selectivity (Entry 3, Table 3).
The integrity of the biocatalyst over time was investigated by a
9-cycle assay with repeated determination of conversions (Fig. 1).
Satisfyingly, the reactor displayed high consistency.
detector was employed, with the detection set at 215 nm,
and the Shimadzu LC solution software was used for chro-
matogram integration. The samples to be analyzed were filtered
through a 0.22 m PTFE filter. The retention times of the sub-
strate ( )-1 and the acetate l-(−)-3 were 8 min and 13 min,
respectively.
4.4. Determination of enantiomeric excesses (ee)
3. Conclusion
Unreacted substrate, d-(+)-1, and monoacetylated product, l-
(−)-3, were separated by HPLC. In the case of substance l-(−)-3, it
was subjected to methanolysis reaction (MeOH/K2CO3), to give triol
l-(−)-1, prior to the HPLC analyses [19]. Chromatographic deter-
minations of ee for l-(−)-3, eep (shown in the tables), (via l-(−)-1)
were carried out on the same equipment mentioned above carry-
ing a Chiralcel OD-H column (5 m; 4.6 × 250 mm), eluted with a
of d-(+)-1 and l-(−)-1 enantiomorphs were 24.5 min and 28.5 min,
respectively. The enantiomeric ratio (E) was calculated by using the
equation (with eep and conversion as inputs; see supplementary
material) of Chen et al. [20].
In conclusion, we have developed a very efficient continuous
flow approach for the kinetic resolution of ( )-1,3,6-tri-O-benzyl-
myo-inositol (( )-1) by which the reactions catalyzed by Novozym
435 using TBME as solvent and vinyl acetate as acetylating agent
could be performed in very short reaction times (3 min of resi-
dence time) with high conversions and enantiomeric ratios. The
operation stability of the biocatalyst was demonstrated via a 9-
cycle assay. The use of this protocol may lead to very practical
chemical syntheses of bioactive inositols. The best condition for
this flow process obtained by our screening allowed a productivity
531 times higher (3.188 mgproduct/mgenzyme h) than that of the opti-
mized condition for the corresponding batch process as we have
recently established (0.006 mgproduct/mgenzyme h) [21]. As a matter
of fact, the productivity issue in lipase/esterase-catalyzed stereos-
elective syntheses of myo-inositols has not been addressed in the
literature.
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found,
Acknowledgments
4. Experimental
We thank CAPES (Coordenac¸ ão de Aperfeic¸ oamento de Pessoal
de Nível Superior), CNPq (Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento
Científico e Tecnológico), FAPERJ (Fundac¸ ão Carlos Chagas Filho de
Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro) and FINEP (Agência
Financiadora de Estudos e Projetos) for financial support.
4.1. Enzyme
Novozym 435 (Lipase B of Candida antarctica immobilized
Novozyme. The enzyme activity was determined as the initial rate
in esterification reactions between oleic acid and ethanol at a molar
ratio of 1:1, temperature of 40 ◦C and enzyme concentration of
5 wt% in relation to the substrates [18]. One lipase activity unit (U)
was defined as the amount of enzyme necessary to consume 1 mol
of oleic acid per minute at the established experimental conditions
previously presented. All enzymatic activity determinations were
replicated at least three times.
References
[1] J. Larner, Int. J. Exp. Diabetes Res. 3 (2002) 47.
[2] J.V. Gerasimenko, S.E. Flowerdew, S.G. Voronina, T.K. Sukhomlin, A.V.
Tepikin, O.H. Petersen, O.V. Gerasimenko, J. Biol. Chem. 281 (2006)
40154.
[3] P.J. Rapiejko, J.K. Northup, T. Evans, J.E. Brown, C.C. Malbon, Biochem. J. 240
(1986) 35.
[4] B.V.L. Potter, D. Lampe, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 34 (1995) 1933.
[5] D.C. Billington, Chem. Soc. Rev. 18 (1989) 83.
[6] J. Duchek, D.R. Adams, T. Hudlicky, Chem. Rev. 111 (2011) 4223.
[7] K.M. Sureshan, M.S. Shashidhar, T. Praveen, T. Das, Chem. Rev. 103 (2003)
4477.
4.2. Continuous flow procedure
[8] (a) V. Gotor-Fernandez, F. Rebolledo, V. Gotor, in: R.N. Patel (Ed.), Biocatalysis
in the Pharmaceutical and Biotechnology Industry, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL,
2007, p. 203;
The enzymatic reactions were performed under continuous
flow conditions using the Asia System from Syrris. A solution
containing 4.86 mM of ( )-1 in solvent (TBME or ethyl acetate)
was used on the continuous flow system. An Omnifit column
with a volume of 12.3 mL was used and fully packed with the
desired enzyme. Different substrate/acylating agent ratios were
used (substrate/acylating agent ratios: 1:5–15 mmol, respectively).
The reaction parameters of temperature (30–60 ◦C) and residence
time were selected on the flow reactor. Aliquots of 0.2 mL and
1.5 mL were taken for 5 min for HPLC analyses of conversion and
enantiomeric excess, respectively, by HPLC. After each run was
complete, we have changed the pump in order to flow pure sol-
vent into the system in a flow rate of 5 mL/min for a period of
15 min.
(b) A. Hidalgo, U.T. Bornscheuer, in: R.N. Patel (Ed.), Biocatalysis in the Pharma-
ceutical and Biotechnology Industry, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2007, p. 159;
(c) A. Ghanem, Tetrahedron 63 (2007) 1721;
(d) F. Hasan, A. Ali Shah, A. Hameed, Enzyme Microb. Technol. 39 (2006) 235;
(e) A. Ghanem, H.Y. Aboul-Enein, Chirality 17 (2005) 1.
[9] E.A. Manoel, K.C. Pais, A.G. Cunha, M.A.Z. Coelho, D.M.G. Freire, A.B.C. Simas,
Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 23 (2012) 47.
[10] C.G. Frost, L. Mutton, Green Chem. 12 (2010) 1687.
[11] (a) A. Pohar, I. Plazl, Chem. Biochem. Eng. Q. 23 (2009) 537;
(b) T.N. Glasnov, J. Flow Chem. 1 (2011) 46;
(c) T.N. Glasnov, J. Flow Chem. 2 (2012) 28.
[12] P. Watts, C. Wiles, Eur. J. Org. Chem. 10 (2008) 1655.
[13] A. Kirschning, S. Ceylan, J. Wegner, Chem. Commun. 47 (2011) 4583.
[14] (a) M.P. Dudukovic, F. Larachi, P.L. Mills, Chem. Eng. Sci. 54 (1999) 1975;
(b) G.M. Whitesides, Nature 442 (2006) 368.
[15] A.G. Cunha, A.A.T. da Silva, A.J. da Silva, L.W. Tinoco, R.V. Almeida, R.B. de
Alencastro, D.M.G. Freire, Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 212 (2010) 899.
[16] (a) I.I. Junior, M.C. Flores, F.K. Sutili, S.G.F. Leite, L.S.M. Miranda,
I.C.R. Leal, R.O.M.A. de Souza, Org. Process Res. Dev. (2012),
4.3. HPLC analysis of conversion of ( )-1 to l-(−)-3
(b) L.M.C. Matos, I.C.R. Leal, R.O.M.A. de Souza, J. Mol. Catal. B 72 (2011) 36;
(c) I.I. Junior, M.C. Flores, F.K. Sutili, S.G.F. Leite, L.S.M. Miranda, I.C.R. Leal,
R.O.M.A. de Souza, J. Mol. Catal. B 77 (2012) 53;
(d) R.O. Lopes, J.B. Ribeiro, A.S. Ramos, L.S.M. Miranda, I.C.R. Leal, S.G.F. Leite,
R.O.M.A. de Souza, Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 22 (2011) 1763;
Conversion analyses were carried out via HPLC on a Shimadzu-
C18 column (40 ◦C in
a CTO-20A oven), eluted with an
acetonitrile–H2O (60:40) mixture (0.5 mL/min) by a Shimadzu LC-
20AT pump. A Shimadzu SPD-M20A variable-wavelength UV/VIS