A R T I C L E S
Ouyang et al.
cally and spectroscopically pure compounds, unless otherwise
MO Microinjections. Various MO, MO/inhibitor duplex, and
cMO solutions containing 0.1% (w/v) phenol red were prepared
and microinjected at 1 or 2 nL/embryo. For example, to inject 115
fmol of MO, 2 nL of a 57.5 µM solution containing 0.1% (w/v)
phenol red was injected into each zebrafish embryo at the one-cell
stage. All embryo injections were done according to standard
procedures, and the embryos were subsequently cultured in E3
medium at 28.5 °C. For two-photon experiments, solutions contain-
ing 1.25 mM dextran-HCC-NPE and 0.1% (w/v) phenol red with
or without 57.5 µM cMO 22b were injected at 2 nL/embryo.
Photolysis of cMOs in Vitro. Photolysis reactions were per-
formed by dissolving 1 nmol of cMO hairpin in water (2 µL) and
irradiating for 1 min using a Leica DM4500B compound micro-
scope equipped with an A4 filter cube (ex: 360 nm, 40 nm bandpass)
and a 20× water-immersion objective (0.50 NA, 13 mW/cm2
intensity at 360 nm). Longer irradiation times did not improve
reaction yields. The solutions were then adjusted to pH 11.5 with
0.02 M NaOH and analyzed by HPLC using a DNAPac PA-200
ion-exchange column (Dionex, 4 mm × 250 mm). Aqueous running
buffers were (A) 0.02 M NaOH, 1% ACN and (B) 0.375 M NaClO4
in 0.02 M NaOH and 1% ACN. The HPLC gradient was 7 to 50%
B in 27 min at 1.2 mL/min.
stated. SiO2 chromatography was carried out with EM Science silica
1
gel (60 Å, 70-230 mesh) as a stationary phase. H NMR and 13
C
NMR spectra were acquired on Varian 300, 400, and 500 MHz
spectrometers and standardized to the NMR solvent peak. Elec-
trospray mass spectrometry (ESI-MS) was performed using a
Micromass ZQ single-quadrupole liquid chromatograph-mass
spectrometer (LC-MS) and a Micromass Q-TOF hybrid quadrupole
LC-MS. Detailed synthetic procedures and structural characteriza-
tion data are provided in the Supporting Information.
Representative Procedure for MO Inhibitor Synthesis (7e).
An MO oligomer (5′-GCCTCAAGTC-3′) with 5′-amine and 3′-
fluorescein modifications was purchased from Gene-Tools, LLC
and used without further purification. This oligomer (100 nmol)
was dissolved in borate buffer [0.1 M Na2B4O7 (pH 8.5), 100 µL]
and combined with linker 2a (0.76 mg, 1.5 µmol) in DMSO (15
µL). The reaction was shaken overnight in the dark and then
lyophilized to dryness. The resulting yellow gum was dissolved in
water (0.5 mL), washed three times with CHCl3 (0.5 mL), and
diluted to 1.5 mL with water. The yellow solution was loaded onto
Toyopearl Super-Q resin (400 µL), washed three times with wash
solution [aqueous 2.5 mM Na2B4O7 (pH 8.5), 50% acetonitrile
(ACN)] and two times with water. Fluoresceinated oligomers were
eluted from the resin with 600 µL of aqueous 5% HOAc/50% ACN,
washed three times with CHCl3 (0.6 mL), and neutralized with 10%
NH4OH(aq) (0.3 mL). Solvent was removed in vacuo, and the
remaining NH4OAc was removed by repeated aqueous solubiliza-
tion and lyophilization, affording 7e as a yellow solid (70 nmol,
70%). MS-ESI for 7e [M + H]+ (m/z): calcd for C184H264N69O61P10,
4728; found, 4728.
Photoactivation of cMOs in Vivo. Zebrafish embryos between
the 64- and 256-cell stages were arrayed in an agarose microin-
jection template. Mercury lamp light was focused onto the
individual embryos for 10 s using a Leica DM4500B compound
microscope equipped with an A4 filtercube and a 20× water-
immersion objective. Embryos were oriented with the animal pole
facing the light source. Following photoactivation, embryos were
cultured in E3 medium at 28.5 °C.
Two-Photon Irradiation of cMOs. Two-photon cMO photo-
activation in zebrafish embryos was performed on an upright two-
photon confocal microscope (Ultima XY, Prairie Technologies, Inc.,
Middleton, WI) equipped with two Ti:sapphire lasers (Mai Tai HP,
Spectra Physics, Mountain View, CA) and a 40× (0.8 NA) water-
immersion objective (LUMPlanFl/IR, Olympus America, Center
Valley, PA). The 820-nm illumination from the first laser (10 mW
at the back focal plane of the objective) was used to collect two
initial images for each embryo: an epifluorescence image (bandpass:
525 nm center, 70 nm fwhm) and an IR gradient contrast image
(820-nm illumination).40 Using the gradient contrast image, an 80
µm × 60 µm × 50 µm region of interest (ROI) was selected for
photoactivation. The ROI was then illuminated for 2 min at 750
nm (65 mW at the back focal plane of the objective) with the second
laser. Following photoactivation, the embryo was reimaged with
820-nm illumination. Following two-photon irradiation, embryos
were cultured in E3 medium at 28.5 °C.
Bright-Field and Fluorescence Microscopy. Chorions were
manually removed from 1 dpf embryos, which were immobilized
in E3 medium containing 0.7% (w/v) low-melt agarose and 0.05%
(w/v) tricaine. Bright-field images were obtained at 5× with a Leica
MZFLIII fluorescence stereoscope equipped with a Leica DC300F
digital camera. Differential interference contrast images and time-
lapse movies were obtained with a Leica DM4500B fluorescence
microscope equipped with a 10× (0.25 NA) objective and a
QImaging Retiga-SRV digital camera. Fluorescence images were
also obtained with this equipment and a CFP filterset (excitation,
436/20 nm; emission, 480/40 nm).
Representative Procedure for cMO Synthesis (8e). The
inhibitory oligomer 7e (50 nmol) and azide-functionalized ntla MO7
6 (50 nmol) were dissolved in phosphate buffer [KH2PO4 (pH 8.0),
230 µL]. To this mixture was added sodium ascorbate (99.0 µg,
500 nmol) in 25 µL of water followed by TBTA (265 µg, 500
nmol) and CuI (95.2 µg, 500 nmol) in 50 µL of DMSO. The
reaction mixture was briefly sonicated and then stirred overnight
at room temperature in the dark. Precipitate was removed from the
reaction mixture by centrifugation, and the supernatant was split
and desalted over two Zeba Desalt size-exclusion columns (Pierce)
according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The desired product
was purified from the reaction mixture by adjusting the solution
pH to 11.5 with 1 M NaOH(aq) and loading it onto a DNAPac
PA-100 ion-exchange HPLC column (Dionex, 9 mm × 250 mm).
Aqueous running buffers were (A) 0.02 M NaOH, 1% ACN and
(B) 0.375 M NaClO4 in 0.02 M NaOH and 1% ACN. A stepwise
gradient was used to separate the product and starting materials,
with specific conditions determined by column capacity. A repre-
sentative purification gradient was the following: 7 to 19% B in 5
min, 19 to 22% B in 10 min, 22 to 50% B in 1 min, and 50% B for
9 min (flow rate 4 mL/min). Elution fractions were collected with
the UV-vis flow-cell lamp turned off to prevent photolysis.
Fractions (1 mL) were collected every 15 s and buffered with 1 M
NH4OAc(aq) (pH 5.0) (40 µL). The fractions containing fluores-
ceinated product were combined and desalted over a Zeba size-
exclusion column. The eluent volume was reduced in vacuo to 50
µL, and the cMOs were precipitated with acetone (400 µL). After
centrifugation, the supernatant was discarded, and the cMO pellet
was washed with ACN (100 µL) and briefly lyophilized, affording
8e as a yellow solid (7 nmol, 14%). MS-ESI for 8e [M + H]+
(m/z): calcd for C488H737N219O164P35, 13379; found, 13380.
Zebrafish Aquaculture and Husbandry. Adult zebrafish (wild-
type AB strain) were acquired from the Zebrafish International
Resource Center. Embryos used in these studies were obtained by
natural matings and cultured in E3 embryo medium at 28.5 °C
according to standard procedures.39
Determination of MO Duplex Binding Energies. For inter-
molecular MO duplexes, the complementary oligomers (0.5 µM,
1:1 molar ratio) in buffer [100 mM KCl, 20 mM HEPES, 10 mM
MgCl2, 0.1 mM EDTA (pH 7.0), 1 mL] were denatured at 95 °C
for 5 min. Thermal denaturation curves were obtained by monitoring
temperature-dependent changes in the absorbance of 260-nm light
using a Varian Cary 300 spectrophotometer (annealing at 0.5 °C/
min). The hypochromicity curves were fitted to a sigmoidal
function, and thermodynamic parameters were calculated using the
(39) Zebrafish: A Practical Approach; Nusslein-Volhard, C., Dahm, R.,
(40) Dodt, H.; Eder, M.; Frick, A.; Zieglgansberger, W. Science 1999, 286,
Eds.; Oxford University Press: New York, 2002; Vol. 261.
110–113.
9
13268 J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 131, NO. 37, 2009