H. N. Hafez, Abdel-Rahman B. A. El-Gazzar / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 19 (2009) 4143–4147
4147
Table 2 (continued)
Panel/cell line
Type of test
10a
10d
11a
11d
GI50
TGI
LC50
GI50
TGI
LC50
GI50
TGI
LC50
GI50
TGI
LC50
Breast cancer
MCF7
NCI/ADR-RES
MDA-MB-231/ATCC
HS578T
MDA-MB-435
BT-549
T-47D
1.53
1.41
1.22
1.30
2.41
1.91
3.12
4.78
4.02
3.29
3.40
6.46
4.63
8.94
n.t
n.t
8.86
8.87
n.t
0.580
0.150
0.325
0.305
0.032
1.130
—
—
n.t
n.t
—
7.73
4.31
2.53
4.11
3.50
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
n.t
n.t
—
0.318
0.998
1.17
1.33
0.326
1.80
—
n.t
n.t
—
0.698
4.22
—
0.52
—
6.48
5.61
8.21
3.60
—
—
—
—
n.t
n.t
nt
n.t
n.t
nt
n.t
n.t
n.
n.t
nt
—
—
4.80
—
n.t., means not tested; (—) values >10 ꢁ 10ꢀ5 M.
18. El-Gazzar, A. B. A.; Hafez, H. N.; Abu-Hashem, A. A.; Aly, A. S. Phosphorus Sulfur
Silicon Relat. Elem. 2009, 184, 379.
19. Franklin, A. D. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 8993.
20. El-Gazzar, A. B. A.; Abu-Zied, Kh. M.; Khir El-Din, N. Heteroatom. Chem. 2007,
18, 34.
21. El-Gazzar, A. B. A.; Hafez, H. N.; Nawwar, G. W. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2009, 44,
1427.
22. El-Gazzar, A. B. A.; El-Enany, M. M.; Mohmoud, M. N. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2008,
16, 3261.
23. El-Gazzar, A. B. A.; Youssef, M. M.; Youssef, A. M. S.; Abu-Hashem, A. A.; Badria,
F. A. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2009, 44, 609.
24. Pogorelova, I. P.; Orlov, V. D.; Isak, A. D. Russ. J. Appl. Chem. 2006, 79, 631.
25. (a) Makarov, V. A.; Sedov, A. L.; Nemeryuk, M. P. Khim.-Farm. Zh. 1993,
4, 26; (b) Mashkovskii, M.D. Lekarstvennye Sredstva (Drugs), Kharkov:
Torsing, 1997.
26. (a) Khromov-Borisov, M. V.; Karpinskaya, R. O. Zh. Obshch. Khim. 1957, 27,
2577; (b) Khromov-Borisov, M. V.; Karpinskaya, R. O. Zh. Obshch. Khim.
1964, 34, 2212; (c) Elderfield, R. E.; Prusad, R. N. J. Org. Chem. 1961, 26,
9863.
morpholine linked to arylthiazolidine on 6-position favorably affects
the activity. The introduction in the same position of an
4-chlorphenylthiazol-idine or 4-tolylthiazolidine group (compound
10b,c and 11b,c) and also, thiazolidine ring without substitution
(compounds 9a–d) or 3-methyltriazolo[4,3-a]pyrimidine (com-
pounds 6a–c, 7) and 6-arylmethylenesulfonoamide (compound 8a–
d) are detrimental. Among 6-arylthiazolidine derivatives thienyl or
4-methoxyphenyl groups on arylidene moiety were effective in
inducingstrongantitumoralactivity.Thebestactivityisshownbythi-
enyl group in presence of 4-methylpiparazine or morpholine deriva-
tives, whereas the presence of 4-chlorophenyl or 4-methylphenyl
group produces variable effects.
Acknowledgment
27. Grever, M. R.; Schepartz, S. A.; Chabner, B. A. Semin. Oncol. 1992, 19, 622.
28. Boyd, M. R.; Paull, K. D. Drug Dev. Res. 1995, 34, 91.
29. Skehan, P.; Storeng, R.; Scudiero, D.; Monks, A.; Mc Mahon, J.; Vistica, D.;
Warren, J. T.; Bokesh, H.; Kenney, S.; Boyd, M. R. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 1990, 82,
1107.
We thank the antitumor Evaluation Branch of the National Can-
cer Institute (Cairo, Egypt) for performing biological evaluations.
Supplementary data
30. Boyd, M. R. Princ. Pract. Oncol. 1989, 3, 1.
31. General: Melting points were measured with Electrothermal IA 9100 apparatus
(Shimadzu, Japan). The 1H NMR spectra were recorded on JEOL ECA500 MHz.
Chemical shifts relative to TMS as internal standard are given as d values in
ppm and recorded in (DMSO-d6). IR spectra were recorded as KBr pellets on a
Nexus FT/IR spectrometer. Mass spectra were recorded on GCMS-QP 1000 EX
Shimadzu. Elemental analyses were performed in the Microanalytical Unit at
Cairo University (Egypt) and were found within 0.4% of the theoretical values
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in
References and notes
(see Table
3 as Supplementary data). The antitumor screening of the
1. Powers, D. L.; Sowell Sr, J. W.; Freeman, J. J.; Kosh, J. W. J .Pharm. Sci. 2006, 69,
473.
2. (a) Pemmsin, M.; Lnu-Due, C.; Hoguet, F.; Gaultier, C.; Narcisse, J. Eur. J. Chem.
1988, 23, 534; (b) El-Gazzar, A. B. A.; El-Enany, M. M.; Mahmoud, M. N. Bioorg.
Med. Chem. 2008, 16, 3261.
3. Kimura, T.; Teraoka, S.; Kuze, J.; Watanabe, K.; Kondo, S.; HO, I.; Yamamoto, I.
Nucleic Acids Symp. Ser. 1993, 29, 51.
4. Bernier, J. L.; Henichart, J. P.; Warin, V.; Baert, F. J .Pharm. Sci. 2006, 69, 1343.
5. Smith, P. A. S.; Kan, R. O. J. Org. Chem. 1964, 29, 2261.
6. Gavrilov, M. Y.; Mardanova, I. G.; Kolla, V. E.; Konshin, M. E. Pharm. Chem. J.
1988, 22, 554.
7. Dinan, F. J.; Bardos, T. J. J. Med. Chem. 1980, 23, 569.
8. Tanaka, H.; Baba, M.; Hayakawa, H.; Sakamaki, T.; Miyasaka, T.; Ubasawa, M.;
Takashima, H.; Sekiya, K.; Nitta, I.; Shigeta, S.; Walker, R. T.; Balzarini, J.; De
Clereq, E. J. Med. Chem. 1991, 34, 349.
9. Darias, V.; Abdallah, S. S.; Tello, M. L.; Delgada, L. D.; Vega, S. Arch. Pharm. 1994,
327, 779.
investigated compounds was carried out by the pharmacology Unit, National
Cancer Institute (NCI), Cancer Biology Department, Cairo University, Egypt).
Primary anticancer assay: The compounds were tested by NCI in an in vitro
three-cell line, one dose primary anticancer assay as a primary cancer screen.
The three-cell line panel consists of the MCF7 (breast), NCI-H460 (lung), and
SF-268 (CNS). Each cell line is inoculated and preincubated on a microtiter
plate. Test agents are then added at single 10-4 M concentration and the
culture is incubated for 48 h. End-point determinations are made with alamar
blue.32 Results for each test agent are reported as the percent of growth of the
treated cells when compared to untreated control cells. Compounds, which
reduce to growth of any one of cell lines to approximately 32% or less, are
passed on for evaluation in the full panel of 60 cell lines over a 5-log dose
range.
Determination of GI50, TGI and LC50 values: A total of 60 human tumor cell lines,
derived from nine cancer types (leukemia, lung, colon, brain, melanoma,
ovarian, renal, prostate, and breast), formed the basis of this test. The tumor
cells were cultured in RPMI1640 medium supplemented with 5% fetal calf
10. Hendry, J. A.; Homer, R. F. J. Chem. Soc. 1952, 328.
serum and 2 mM L-glutamine. The tumor cells are inoculated over a series of
11. Cordeu, L.; Cubedo, E.; Bandres, E.; Rebollo, A.; Saenz, X.; Chozes, H. M.;
Dominquez, V.; Echeverria, M.; Mendivil, B.; Sanmartin, C.; Palop, J. A.; Font,
M.; Garcia-Foncillas, J. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2007, 15, 1659.
12. Navarro, J. A. R.; Salas, J. M.; Romero, M. A.; Vilaplana, R.; Faure, R. J. Med. Chem.
1998, 41, 332.
standard 96-well microtiter plates in 100 mL of medium.27,28 Density of
inoculums depends on the type of tumor cell and on its growth
characteristics.33 These cells are then preincubated on the microtiter plate
for 24 h before adding the compounds. They were tested in DMSO solution at
five different concentrations (10ꢀ4, 10ꢀ5, 10ꢀ6, 10ꢀ7, and 10ꢀ8 M). After an
13. Hafez, H. N.; El-Gazzar, A. B. A. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2008, 18, 5222.
14. Sherif, M. S.; Youssef, M. M.; Mobarak, K. M.; Abdel-Fattah, A. M. Tetrahedron
1993, 49, 9561.
15. Wu, Z.; Hartnett, J. C.; Neilson, L. A.; Robinson, R. G.; Fu, S.; Barnett, S. F.; Defeo-
Jones, D.; Jones, R. E.; Kral, A. M.; Huber, H. E.; Hartman, G. D.; Bilodeau, M. T.
Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2008, 18, 1274.
incubation of the chemical agent for 48 h with the tumor cell lines, a
sulforhodamine B (SRB) protein assay was used to estimate cell viability or
growth. The cytotoxic effects are evaluated, and the assay results and dose-
response parameters were calculated as previously described.30
32. Gray, G. D.; Wickstrom, E. Biotechniques 1996, 21, 780.
33. Monks, A.; Scudiero, D.; Skehan, P.; Shoemaker, P.; Paull, K.; Vistica, D.; Hose,
C.; Langley, J.; Cronise, P.; Vaigro-Wolff, A.; Gray-Goodrich, M.; Campbell, H.;
Mayo, J.; Boyd, M. R. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 1991, 83, 757.
16. Hafez, H. N.; Abbas, H. A. S.; El-Gazzar, A. B. A. Acta Pharm. 2008, 58, 359.
17. El-Gazzar, A. B. A.; Hossein, H. A. R.; Hafez, H. N. Acta Pharm. 2007, 57, 395.