4966
A. E. Kümmerle et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 19 (2009) 4963–4966
Figure 1. Structure–activity relationship between the NAH and cyclic compounds 3, 4, 6 and 8. HI—hydrophobic interactions, HBA—hydrogen bond acceptor, HBD—hydrogen
bond donor. (A) Putative pharmacophore model for the NAH 3 and N-methyl-NAH 4. (B) Compounds 6 and 8 fitted in putative pharmacophore model of original NAHs 3 and
4. (C) Superposition of NAHs 3 (yellow) and 4 (green) and cyclic compounds 6 and 8.
Among the 6 synthesized heterocycles, that is, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9a/9b
and 10, considered as putative 3 and 4 NAH biomimetics, two of
them (6, 8) presented similar analgesic properties, in vivo, com-
pared to the NAH lead compounds in the AcOH-induced abdominal
constrictions test using oral administrations in mice (Table 1).17
They were around two times more potent than 3 showing that
for these two new derivatives, we were able to improve their bio-
activity despite the conformational difference between both clas-
ses of compounds. The others four tested compounds (5, 7, 9a/9b
(as a mixture of regioisomers) and 10) did not present significant
activity compared to 3 and 4 in this assay.
Acknowledgments
Thanks are due to CAPES-COFECUB (2260/06-9), CNPq (INCT-
INOFAR, BR.), PRONEX (BR.) and FAPERJ (BR.) for financial support
and fellowships.
Supplementary data
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in
To evaluate the similarity of the two new heterocyclic scaffolds
(6, 8) with the original lead compounds (3, 4), these compounds
were first sketched in the BioMedCAche 6.0 software.18 Then, the
local and global energy minimizations were obtained with semi-
empirical AM1 method using dihedral angle search in a 24 steps
of 15 degrees by dihedral angle (Fig. 1). The results demonstrated
the typically difference between the NAH and the N-methyl-
NAH,19 as described for aromatic methyl amides:20 the N-methyl-
ation leads to an amide bond rotation generating a synperiplanar
conformation, as seen for LASSBio-1385 (4).19 After we have done
a putative pharmacophore model for 3 and 4 (Fig. 1A) and we were
able to identify that LASSBio-1418 (8) and LASSBio-1419 (6) fit per-
fectly in the models made from LASSBio-575 (3) and LASSBio-1385
(4), respectively. This result validated the initial structural design
strategy to exploit the conformational differences between the
NAH and N-methyl-NAH derivatives (Fig. 1B). In addition, the
alignment of the central NAH framework of the lead compounds
3 and 4 with the corresponding heterocyclic scaffolds in 8 and 6
confirmed the correlation between the NAH and the mimic com-
pounds with a RMS ranging from 0.0956 (4 and 6) to 0.0161 (3
and 8) (Fig. 1C).
References and notes
1. Fraga, C. A. M.; Barreiro, E. J. Curr. Med. Chem. 2006, 13, 167.
2. Viegas-Junior, C.; Danuello, A.; Da Silva Bolzani, V.; Barreiro, E. J.; Fraga, C. A. M.
Curr. Med. Chem. 2007, 14, 1829.
3. Lima, L. M.; Barreiro, E. J. Curr. Med. Chem. 2005, 12, 23.
4. Barreiro, E. J. Quim. Nova. 2002, 25, 1172.
5. Wermuth, C. G. The Practice of Medicinal Chemistry, 2nd ed.; Academic Press,
2003.
6. Tobe, M.; Isobe, Y.; Tomizawa, H.; Nagasaki, T.; Takahashi, H.; Fukazawa, T.;
Hayashi, H. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2003, 11, 383.
7. Lima, P. C.; Lima, L. M.; da Silva, K. C. M.; Léda, P. H. O.; de Miranda, A. L. P.;
Fraga, C. A. M.; Barreiro, E. J. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2000, 35, 187.
8. Karabatsos, G. J.; Taller, R. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1963, 85, 3624.
9. Palla, G.; Predieri, G.; Domiano, P.; Vignali, C.; Turner, W. Tetrahedron 1986, 42,
3649.
10. Asano, T.; Yoshikawa, T.; Usui, T.; Yamamoto, H.; Yamamoto, Y.; Uehara, Y.;
Nakamura, H. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2004, 12, 3529.
11. de Araújo-Júnior, J. X.; Schmitt, M.; Benderitter, P.; Bourguignon, J. Tetrahedron
Lett. 2006, 47, 6125.
12. Walser, A.; Zenchoff, G. J. Med. Chem. 1977, 20, 1694.
13. Mitkidou, S.; Stephanidou-Stephanatou, J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1990, 31, 5197.
14. Miyaura, N.; Suzuki, A. Chem. Rev. 1995, 95, 2457.
15. Wang, J.; Liu, Z.; Hu, Y.; Wei, B.; Kang, L. Synth. Commun. 2002, 32,
1937.
16. Flammang, M.; Wermuth, C. G. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 1977, 12, 121.
17. Collier, H. O.; Dinneen, L. C.; Johnson, C. A.; Schneider, C. Br. J. Pharmacol.
Chemother. 1968, 32, 295.
The use of conformational restriction in optimization of NAH
compounds produced two original analgesic compounds (6, 8)
which present scaffolds that have never been reported for this
pharmacological activity, and now it can be applied to different
NAH derivatives, a structure easily accessed that may present
numerous pharmacological profiles.
18. BioMedCAche, Fujitsu Limited: Tokyo, Japan.
19. Kummerle, A. E.; Raimundo, J. M.; Leal, C. M.; da Silva, G. M.; Balliano, T. L.;
Pereira, M. A.; de Simone, C. A.; Sudo, R. T.; Fraga, C.; Barreiro, E. Eur. J. Med.
20. Kagechika, H.; Himi, T.; Kawachi, E.; Shudo, K. J. Med. Chem. 1989, 32,
2292.