boxylic acids with alkenyl bromides provides an efficient
and general route to the synthesis of enol lactones.
Table 2. O-Vinylation of Carboxylic Acids 1
The past few years have witnessed a rapid progress in the
formation of aryl (or vinyl) C-X bonds (X ) N, O, S, etc.)
via copper-catalyzed Ullmann coupling between aryl (or vinyl)
halides and heteroatom-centered nucleophiles.7 The high stabil-
ity and low costs of the copper catalysts make these transforma-
tions attractive for industrial applications. By the appropriate
choice of copper source, ligand, base, and solvent, these
reactions have been developed to include a wide range of
substrates under mild conditions. Various O-centered nucleo-
philes such as alcohols and ketone enolates can be successfully
used for the coupling reactions. However, the use of carboxy-
lates as the nucleophiles remains far less explored.8 Thasana
and co-workers recently reported the preparation of benzopy-
ranones via the cyclization of 2′-halobiaryl-2-carboxylic acids
under microwave irradiation using stoichiometric amounts of
Cu(I).8a Their method failed to provide simpler lactones starting
from nonaromatic carboxylic acids; only decarboxylation was
observed. Driven by our interest in Cu(I)-catalyzed intramo-
lecular vinlyation reactions,9 we set out to study the intramo-
lecular O-vinylation of carboxylic acids.
Thus, 4-bromo-2-phenylpent-4-enoic acid (1a) was chosen
as the model substrate. Compound 1a was first subjected to
the following typical Ullmann coupling conditions: CuI (10
mol %), 1,10-phenanthroline (Phen, 20 mol %),10 K2CO3 (2
equiv) in refluxing THF. No reaction occurred within 6 h
(entry 1, Table 1). Switching the ligand to L-proline11 did
not help. To our delight, when N,N,N′,N′-tetramethylethyl-
enediamine (TMEDA)12 was used as the ligand, the expected
product 2a was obtained in 25% yield (entry 3, Table 1).
The best result (87% yield of 2a) was achieved with N,N′-
dimethylcyclohexane-1,2-diamine13 (DMCHDA) as the ligand
a Reaction conditions: 1 (0.3 mmol), CuI (0.03 mmol), DMCHDA (0.06
mmol), K2CO3 (0.6 mmol), THF (3 mL), reflux. b Isolated yield based on
1. c The reaction was conducted in refluxing acetonitrile. d Ar ) p-MeOC6H4.
f
e R ) n-C10H21. Z:E ) 83:17 determined by H NMR (300 MHz).
1
Table 1. Optimization of the Synthesis of 2a from 1a
(entry 5, Table 1). Lowering the amounts of CuI and
DMCHDA resulted in a slight decrease of the yield of 2a
(entry 9, Table 1). We next examined the effects of different
bases. It turned out that K2CO3 was superior to Cs2CO3,
K3PO4, and Na2CO3 (entries 5-8, Table 1). As a comparison,
the coupling did not proceed at all without either CuI or the
ligand or the base (entries 10-12, Table 1).
With the optimized combination (entry 5, Table 1) in hand,
we then examined the generality of this method (Table 2).
Substrates 1a-1f bearing different substituents at the C-2
position all afforded the expected cyclization products in high
yields (entries 1-6, Table 2). Dialkyl substitution at the C-2
entrya
ligand (mol %)b
base
yield (%)c
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Phen (20)
K2CO3
K2CO3
K2CO3
K2CO3
K2CO3
K3PO4
Cs2CO3
Na2CO3
K2CO3
K3PO4
none
0
0
L-proline (20)
TMEDA (20)
DMEDA (20)
DMCHDA (20)
DMCHDA (20)
DMCHDA (20)
DMCHDA (20)
DMCHDA (10)
none
25
76
87
60
27
0
76
0
0
(7) For reviews, see:(a) Kunz, K.; Scholz, U.; Ganzer, D. Synlett 2003,
2428. (b) Ley, S. V.; Thomas, A. W. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42,
5400. (c) Beletskaya, I. P.; Cheprakov, A. V. Coord. Chem. ReV. 2004,
248, 2337. (d) Deng, W.; Liu, L.; Guo, Q.-X. Chin. J. Org. Chem. 2004,
24, 150. (e) Dehli, J. R.; Legros, J.; Bolm, C. Chem. Commun. 2005, 973.
(f) Chemler, S. R.; Fuller, P. H. Chem. Soc. ReV. 2007, 36, 1153. (g) Evano,
G.; Blanchard, N.; Toumi, M. Chem. ReV. 2008, 108, 3054. (h) Ma, D.;
Cai, Q. Acc. Chem. Res. 2008, 41, 1450. (i) Evano, G.; Toumi, M.; Coste,
A. Chem. Commun. 2009, 4166.
9d
10
11
12e
DMCHDA (20)
DMCHDA (20)
K2CO3
0
a Reaction conditions: 1a (0.3 mmol), CuI (0.03 mmol), ligand (0.06
mmol), base (0.6 mmol), THF (3 mL), reflux, 6 h. b Phen: 1,10-
phenanthroline. TMEDA: N,N,N′,N′-tetramethylethylenediamine. DMEDA:
N,N′-dimethylethylenediamine. DMCHDA: trans-N,N′-dimethylcyclo-
hexane-1,2-diamine. c Isolated yield based on 1a. d 5 mol % of CuI was
used. e No CuI was used.
(8) (a) Thasana, N.; Worayuthakarn, R.; Kradanrat, P.; Hohn, E.; Young,
L.; Ruchirawat, S. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 9379. (b) Yamamoto, T.; Kurata,
Y. Can. J. Chem. 1983, 61, 86. (c) Yamamoto, T. Synth. Commun. 1979,
9, 219.
Org. Lett., Vol. 11, No. 18, 2009
4085