dramatically improved the chemoselectivity (30:1) and the
conversion (76%) (run 2). On the other hand, the replacement
Scheme 1. Proposed Mechanism for the Au(I)-Catalyzed Cyclization
-
of the counterion by SbF6 and OTf- proved to be de-
trimental to the selectivity despite a slight improvement of
the conversion (runs 3 and 4). Surprisingly, the air stable
Echavarren catalyst 13,11 gave mainly the hydration product
10a in dichloroethane (run 5). In contrast, high chemose-
lectivity was achieved when toluene was used as solvent (run
7). Additional experimentation demonstrated that 2 mol %
of 13 in acetone was optimal for this process (run 8).12
Having established the reaction conditions, the scope of this
Au(I)-catalyzed 6-endo-dig cyclization was then examined
(Table 2).13 Enol ethers 4b, 4c,and 4d were readily converted
to ketones 7b, 7c, and 7d in 85, 80, and 98% yields,
respectively. Thus, the frameworks of the three natural products
depicted in Figure 1 are rapidly and efficiently synthesized using
this new approach. The method tolerates substitution, as
evidenced by the cyclization of substrates 4e-h, which give
the desired ketones 7e-h exclusively and in high yields. It
worth noting is that bicyclo[3.3.1]nonenones 7g and 7h bear
the two bridgehead quaternary carbon centers present in 2 and
related natural polycyclic polyprenylated acetylphloroglucin
compounds.
Next, we looked at the Au(I)-catalyzed carbocyclization
of substrates possessing a tetrasubstituted enol ether and an
internal alkyne. Compounds 4i-l were treated under the
standard conditions to provide the corresponding bicyclo-
[3.3.1]nonenones 7i-l in 78-92% yield. These results con-
firmed that alkyl and/or aryl substitutions at R1 and R2 in 4 do
not impair the regio- and chemoselectivity of the reaction.
In the context of its application to the total synthesis of
natural polycyclic polyprenylated acetylphloroglucins, we
further probed the scope of this transformation.
the mechanism reveals that the Au(I)-catalyzed cyclization
can proceed via three distinct pathways. In path A, a 6-endo-
dig cyclization of 4 gives intermediate 6 which after
protonation leads to the desired product 7. Conversely, Au(I)
complex 5 can undergo competitive 5-exo-dig cyclization
to afford intermediate 8 (path B) and 11 (path C) which upon
protonation and hydrolysis provide the hydration product 10
and the bicyclic ketone 12, respectively.
Keeping this in mind, we examined various cationic
phosphinogold(I) complexes. Treatment of silyl enol ether
4a10 with 5 mol % of Ph3PAuCl/AgBF4 in DCM at room
temperature gave the bridged ketone 7a as the major product
in low conversion (30%) (Table 1, run 1). The minor product
(6) (a) Drouin, J.; Boaventura, M. A.; Conia, J. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1985, 107, 1726. (b) Drouin, J.; Boaventura, M. A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1987,
28, 3923. (c) Huang, H.; Forsyth, C. J. J. Org. Chem. 1995, 60, 2773. (d)
Iwasawa, N.; Maeyama, K.; Kusama, H. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 3871. (e)
Iwasawa, N.; Miura, T.; Kiyota, K.; Kusama, H.; Lee, K.; Lee., P. H. Org.
Lett. 2002, 4, 4463. (f) Nevado, C.; Cardenas, D. J.; Echavarren, A. M.
Chem.sEur. J. 2003, 9, 2627. (g) Corkey, B. K.; Toste, F. D. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2007, 129, 2764.
Table 1. Optimization
(7) For Au(I)-catalyzed cyclization, see: (a) Dankwardt, J. K. Tetrahe-
dron Lett. 2001, 42, 5809. (b) Suhre, M. H.; Reif, M.; Kirsch, S. F. Org.
Lett. 2005, 7, 3925. (c) Staben, S. T.; Kennedy-Smith, J. J.; Huang, D.;
Corkey, B. K.; LaLonde, R. L.; Toste, F. D. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006,
45, 5991. (d) Linghu, X.; Kennedy-Smith, J. J.; Toste, F. D. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 7671. (e) Lee, K.; Lee, P. H. AdV. Synth. Catal. 2007,
349, 2092.
(8) For terminal alkynes, 10 mol % W(CO)5(THF) is required, see: (a)
Iwasawa, N.; Maeyama, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 1928. For
substituted alkynes, a stoichiometric amount of W(CO)5(THF) is required,
see: (b) Iwasawa, N.; Miura, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 518. (c) For
EtAlCl2-mediated cyclization, see: Imamura, K.; Yoshikawa, E.; Gevorgyan,
V.; Yamamoto, Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 4081.
(9) Recent reviews on gold catalysis: (a) Muzart, J. Tetrahedron 2008,
64, 5815. (b) Fu¨rstner, A.; Davies, P. W. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007, 46,
3410. (c) Hashmi, A. S. K. Chem. ReV. 2007, 107, 3180. (d) Jimenez-
Nu´nez, E.; Echavarren, A. M. Chem. Commun. 2007, 333. (e) Gorin, D. J.;
Toste, F. D. Nature 2007, 446, 395.
(10) The preparation of silyl enol ethers 4a-l is described in the
Supporting Information.
a
Determined by H NMR. b 2 mol % of catalyst was used. c Isolated
1
yield ) 90%.
(11) Nieto-Oberhuber, C.; Lopez, S.; Echavarren, A. M. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2005, 127, 6178.
(12) All reaction vessels were treated in a KOH/i-PrOH bath prior to
use.
ketone 10a results from a cyclization via path B. The
replacement of triphenylphosphine by triethylphosphine
(13) In all runs, no products from path B or C were observed by 1H
NMR of the crude reaction mixture.
Org. Lett., Vol. 11, No. 18, 2009
4237