G. Giuliani et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 53 (2012) 5114–5118
5117
underlying mechanisms of bioluminescence in this class of
molecules.
Acknowledgments
We thank Professor P. Knochel and Dr. T. Bresser (Dep. Chemie
& Biochemie, LMU, Munchen, Germany) for their experimental
support and encouragement.
Supplementary data
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in
References and notes
1. (a) Rowe, L.; Dikici, E.; Daunert, S. Anal. Chem. 2009, 81, 8662–8668; (b)
Michelini, E.; Cevenini, L.; Mezzanotte, L.; Ablamsky, D.; Southworth, T.;
Branchini, B.; Roda, A. Anal. Chem. 2008, 80, 60–67; (c) De, A. Curr. Pharm.
Biotechnol. 2011, 12, 558–568; (d) Menon, V.; Ranganathn, A.; Jorgensen, V. H.;
Sabio, M.; Christoffersen, C. T.; Uberti, M. A.; Jones, K. A.; Babu, P. S. Assay Drug
Dev. Technol. 2008, 6, 787–793.
Figure 6. Bioluminescence spectrum of compound 5. The dotted lines indicate the
two emitting components resolved by the fitting procedure (see Section 4 of
Supplementary data).
2. (a) Watts, J. C.; Giles, K.; Grillo, S. K.; Lemus, A.; DeArmond, S. J.; Prusiner, S. B.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2011, 108, 2528–2533; (b) Patel, M. R.; Chang, Y. F.;
Chen, I. Y.; Bachmann, M. H.; Yan, X.; Contag, C. H.; Gambhir, S. S. Cancer Res.
2010, 70, 10141–10149.
3. Campbell, A. K. Chemiluminescence, principles and applications in biology and
medicine; Ellis Horwood Ltd: Chichester (England), 1988. pp. 189–218.
4. (a) Shimomura, O. Bioluminescence, chemical principles and methods; World
Scientific Publishing Co. Ltd: Singapore, 2006. pp. 159–176; (b) Liu, F.; Liu, Y.;
De Vico, L.; Lindh, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 6181–6188; (c) Isobe, H.;
Yamanaka, S.; Okumura, M.; Yamaguchi, K. J. Phys. Chem. A 2009, 113, 15171–
15187.
5. Hori, K.; Wampler, J. E.; Cormier, M. J. Chem. Commun. 1973, 492–493.
6. Weissleder, R. Nat. Biotechnol. 2001, 19, 316–317.
7. Loening, A. M.; Wu, A. M.; Gambhir, S. S. Nat. Methods 2007, 4, 641–643.
8. Inouye, S.; Shimomura, O. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1997, 233, 349–353.
9. Dragulescu-Andrasi, A.; Chan, C. T.; De, A.; Massoud, T. F.; Gambhir, S. S. Proc.
Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2011, 108, 12060–12065.
(ꢀ80 nm) with both Cl and S substitutions (6 vs 3, Table 1) was sig-
nificantly greater than that produced by only heteroatom replace-
ment (4). Moreover, Cl substitution in the absence of S (5)
determined a broadening of the bioluminescence spectrum, which
could be resolved as two components of higher and lower energy
(Fig. 6), suggesting that this compound generates two stable emit-
ters during the enzymatic reaction. Unfortunately, compound 6
also suffered a fivefold drop of bioluminescence efficiency com-
pared to 3; consequently the lower quality of spectral data did
not allow further analysis (Fig. S1).18
An additional interesting finding was only observed in the h-
coelenterazine derivative 8, and involved a sharp change of biolu-
minescence kinetics.18 Unlike 7, which shows the typical flash-like
kinetics of coelenterazines, with an immediate burst to peak emis-
sion rate followed by steady decay, the derivative 8 displayed a
more complex pattern. The initial burst was followed by a second
slower increase of emission rate, which lasted 5–7 s before giving
rise to the decay phase (Fig. S2). This peculiar difference in kinetics
was not observed in the chemiluminescent reaction (Fig. S3), which
suggests that the phenomenon is caused by different interactions of
the two molecules within the binding pocket of the enzyme.
The results of this study appear to support the idea that the
insertion of a C-8 bonded S atom, (thus achieving partial mimicry
10. Wu, C.; Nakamura, H.; Murai, A.; Shimomura, O. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42,
2997–3000.
11. Naumov, P.; Ozawa, Y.; Ohkubo, K.; Fukuzumi, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131,
11590–11605.
12. (a) Nakamura, H.; Aizawa, M.; Murai, A. Synlett 1996, 1015–1017; (b) DeBie, D.
A.; Ostrowicz, A.; Guertsen, G.; VanDerPlas, H. C. Tetrahedron 1988, 44, 2977–
2983; (c) Jones, K.; Keenan, M.; Hibbert, F. Synlett 1996, 509–510; (d)
Adamczyk, M.; Johnson, D. D.; Mattingly, P. G.; Pan, Y.; Reddy, R. E. Org. Prep.
Proced. Int. 2001, 33, 477–485.
13. General procedure for the synthesis of 11a–c: To
a cooled solution of the
appropriate thiophenol (1.0 equiv) in dry DMF, sodium hydride (1.2 equiv) was
added and the resulting mixture stirred at 5–10 °C for 15 min. Bromo
derivative 10a,b (1.0 equiv) was then added and the mixture was heated at
80 °C for 17–20 h. The reaction mixture was quenched with water and
extracted with EtOAc. The combined extracts were dried over anhydrous
Na2SO4 and concentrated under reduced pressure. Purification of the residue
by flash chromatography gave the target intermediates 11a–c (yield 74–80%).
Compound 11a: mp: 110–112 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) d: 8.37 (s, 1H, Ar-
H), 7.78 (d, J = 7.2, 2H, Ph-H), 7.53–7.50 (m, 2H, Ph-H), 7.41–7.29 (m, 6H, Ph-H),
5.02 (br s, 2H, NH2). 13C NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) d: 151.8, 143.0, 137.8, 137.0,
136.6, 132.7, 130.7, 129.3, 128.8, 128.3, 125.5. MS (ESI) m/z: 280 [M+H+].
Compound 11b: mp: 157–158 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CD3OD, 25 °C, TMS):
d = 8.29 (s, 1H; Ar-H), 7.68 (d, J(H;H) = 7.2 Hz, 2H, Ph-H), 7.51 (d,
J(H;H) = 8.4 Hz, 2H, Ph-H), 7.43 (d, J(H;H) = 8.8 Hz, 2H, Ph-H), 7.32 (t,
J(H,H) = 7.4 Hz, 2H, Ph-H), 7.24–7.27 (m, 1H, Ph-H). 13C NMR (400 MHz,
CD3OD, 25 °C, TMS): d = 152.7, 140.0, 137.4, 136.8, 136.7, 135.3, 133.7, 129.8,
129.7, 129.1, 128.2, 125.1. MS (ESI) m/z: 314 [M+H+]. Compound 11c:
Purification of the residue by flash chromatography using Al2O3, with
CH2Cl2ÁEtOAc (9:1 v/v) as the eluent, afforded compound 11c. mp: 154–
155 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3, 25 °C, TMS): d = 8.28 (s, 1H; Ar-H), 7.68 (d,
J(H,H) = 8.8 Hz, 2H; Ph-H), 7.43 (d, J(H,H) = 8.8 Hz, 2H; Ph-H), 7.34 (d,
J(H,H) = 8.8 Hz, 2H; Ph-H), 6.91 (d, J(H,H) = 8.8 Hz, 2H; Ph-H), 4.90 (br s, 2H;
NH2), 3.82 (s, 3H; CH3). 13C NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3, 25 °C, TMS): d = 160.0,
151.0, 143.1, 136.9, 136.4, 134.4, 134.0, 129.3, 129.1, 126.7, 114.2, 55.4. MS
(ESI) m/z: 366 [M+Na+]. Compound 11d: To a Schlenk’s tube containing pyridine
hydrochloride (20 equiv) heated at 190 °C, compound 11c (1 equiv) was added.
The resulting mixture was stirred at 190 °C for 2 h under an argon atmosphere,
cooled at RT, and quenched with a saturated solution of NaHCO3. The resulting
mixture was extracted with EtOAc and the combined extracts were dried and
concentrated under reduced pressure. Purification of the residue by flash
chromatography using Al2O3, with CH2Cl2ÁEtOAc (1:1 v/v) as the eluent,
of the 2Y heteroatomic pattern in D-luciferin), can favor the emer-
gence of lower energy emitters in coelenteramide. This bathochro-
mic effect was evident in the presence of either the phenyl or the
phenol ring in C-6, indicating that the red shift can occur regardless
of whether the main emitter is the neutral or the amide-anion form
of the molecule. It also occurred in both chemiluminescence and
bioluminescence, suggesting that it likely results from an intrinsic
change in the electronic properties of the excited states of the mol-
ecule, independently of how they are produced. Fluorescence stud-
ies of coelenteramide analogues and model compounds suggest
that the lowest energy emitting species (530–550 nm) formed dur-
ing coelenterazine oxidation is the pyrazine-N(4) anion.19 We may
speculate that S replacement and the highly conductive 2Y pattern
that it generates may favor the formation of this anionic species.
However, further work is necessary to verify this possibility.
In conclusion, we describe here a new series of red-shifted
coelenterazine analogues and a novel approach to alter the photo-
chemical properties of the light-emitter intermediates. Further
exploitation of these findings may extend understanding on the