C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
The decay of singlet carbene (12) is not accompanied by the
growth of transient UV-vis absorption of cyclopropene 3, prompt-
ing the use of IR detection.
greatly affected by the overlapping hot ground state 1#. The long
lifetime of the triplet, relative to the singlet carbene, indicates that
the two spin isomers are not in rapid equilibrium, as predicted by
the large calculated energy separation (SI, ∆EST ) 7.9 kcal/mol).
In the diazo stretching region (Figure S6) the negative band
observed at 2085 cm-1 is due to the bleaching of the ground-state
precursor. As usual, the hot ground state is observed on its red
edge as a broad positive band, which then undergoes blue-shifting
and narrowing within 40 ps, a result typical of vibrational cooling.19
About 31% of the diazo bleaching band was recovered within 3
ns. The growth time constant of 18.4 ps (Figure S7), as probed at
2085 cm-1, is assigned to the vibrational cooling of diazo precursor.
The exact correspondence of the FTIR spectrum with the transient
spectrum at 2.5 ns, post flash, convinces us that a ketene is not
detected.
In summary, we have observed a singlet vinylcarbene (12)
produced directly from the excited state of a diazo precursor (1).
The singlet carbene undergoes intramolecular cyclopropenation
reaction to produce the cyclopropene product (3) in acetonitrile,
chloroform and cyclohexane, and undergoes intersystem crossing
to ground triplet carbene (32) to a small extent. The triplet carbene
is not in rapid equilibrium with the singlet due to a relatively large
singlet triplet separation.
Figure 2. Transient IR spectra produced upon 270 nm photolysis of
PhCHdCHCN2CO2CH3 in chloroform. The dotted curve is the FTIR
spectrum of PhCHdCHCN2CO2CH3 in chloroform. Bars represent the
calculated frequencies for singlet carbene (12), triplet carbene (32), and
cyclopropene (3).
Ultrafast photolysis (270 nm) of 1 in chloroform produces the
transient IR spectra shown in Figure 2. The negative band observed
in the 1750-1640 cm-1 region is due to the bleaching of the
carbonyl (CdO) stretch in the diazo precursor (1). However, the
carbonyl bleaching band reshapes over 100 ps, clearly indicating
that a new species absorbing around 1705 cm-1 is formed rapidly.
A positive band at 1770 cm-1 was also observed. This band narrows
and shifts to the blue within 80 ps of the laser pulse and retains the
same intensity over 3 ns. Identical kinetic behavior was observed
monitoring at 1770 and 1705 cm-1 which suggests that both bands
are associated with the same intermediate. After subtracting the
FTIR spectrum of the diazo precursor, two positive bands at 1770
and 1705 cm-1 are clearly observed and persist for at least 3 ns
(Figure S4). Both bands are assigned to the cyclopropene (3) formed
by the intramolecular cyclopropenation reaction (Scheme 1).
B3LYP/6-31G(d) calculations predict cyclopropene (3) has coupled
stretching modes of CdO and CdC at 1776 and 1723 cm-1 (Table
S3). The direct observation of both vibrational bands and the
excellent agreement with calculations indicate that the carrier of
the observed transient absorptions is indeed the cyclopropene
product (3).
Acknowledgment. The work was performed at The OSU Center
for Chemical and Biophysical Dynamics. Support of this work by
the National Science Foundation is gratefully acknowledged.
Supporting Information Available: A brief description of the
spectrometers, complete ref 9, Figures S1-S6, and Tables S1-S6. This
References
(1) Moss, R. A.; Platz, M. S.; Jones, M., Jr. ReactiVe Intermediate Chemistry;
Wiley: New York, 2004.
(2) Closs, G. L.; Closs, L. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1961, 83, 2015–2016.
(3) Hutton, R. S.; Manion, M. L.; Roth, H. D.; Wasserman, E. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1974, 96, 4680–4682.
(4) Yoshimine, M.; Pacansky, J.; Honjou, N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111,
2785–2798.
(5) Freeman, P. K. J. Org. Chem. 2009, 74, 830–833.
(6) Zuev, P. S.; Sheridan, R. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 12220–12221.
(7) Moss, R. A.; Tian, J.; Sauers, R. R.; Sheridan, R. S.; Bhakta, A.; Zuev,
P. S. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 4645–4648.
(8) Doyle, M. P.; Yan, M.; Hu, W.; Gronenberg, L. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2003, 125, 4692–4693.
(9) Frisch, M. J.; et al. Gaussian 03, revision C.02; Gaussian, Inc.: Wallingford,
CT, 2004.
Integration of the intensity of both bands indicates that cyclo-
propene (3) is formed with a time constant of 32 ps in chloroform
(Table S2, Figure S5), in good agreement with the singlet carbene
(12) decay observed in this solvent by ultrafast UV-vis spectros-
copy (Figure S1d). This result confirms that singlet carbene (12) is
the immediate precursor of cyclopropene (3).
(10) Schmitz, C. Ph.D. Thesis. University of Bochum, Germany, 1986.
(11) Wang, J.; Burdzinski, G.; Gustafson, T. L.; Platz, M. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2007, 129, 2597–2606.
(12) Zhang, Y.; Burdzinski, G.; Kubicki, J.; Platz, M. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2008, 130, 16134–16135.
(13) Zhang, Y.; Kubicki, J.; Wang, J.; Platz, M. S. J. Phys. Chem. A 2008, 112,
11093–11098.
(14) The weak and broad absorption in the 500-600 nm range at longer time
delays (400 ps to 3 ns) is attributed to the re-excitation of photoproduct as
this band is produced by excitation of bleached solution (Figure S3) which
does not contain diazo precursor.
B3LYP/6-31G(d) calculations predict singlet carbene (12) vibra-
tions at 1641 cm-1 (Table S4) and triplet (32) at 1653 cm-1 (Table
S5). Indeed, in the 1680-1580 cm-1 spectral range (Figure 2) a
broad positive band is observed. Its decay correlates with cyclo-
propene (3) growth, and an isosbestic point at 1684 cm-1 is
observed, clearly suggesting that the singlet carbene is detected.
At ∼1650 cm-1, absorption is still present 3 ns post laser pulse,
consistent with the formation of triplet carbene (32). However, the
precise kinetics of either the singlet carbene (12) or triplet carbene
(32) cannot be obtained by time-resolved IR methods as they are
(15) Wang, J.; Burdzinski, G.; Gustafson, T. L.; Platz, M. S. J. Org. Chem.
2006, 71, 6221–6228.
(16) Wang, J.; Kubicki, J.; Gustafson, T. L.; Platz, M. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2008, 130, 2304–2313.
(17) Zhang, Y.; Burdzinski, G.; Kubicki, J.; Platz, M. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2009, 131, 9646–9647.
(18) Wang, J.; Burdzinski, G.; Kubicki, J.; Platz, M. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008,
130, 11195–11209.
(19) Schwarzer, D.; Troe, J.; Votsmeier, M.; Zerezke, M. J. Chem. Phys. 1996,
105, 3121–3131.
JA905992P
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 131, NO. 38, 2009 13603