ChemComm
Communication
DLS experiment (Fig. 3d and Fig. S8, ESI†). A very significant
drop in the average particle size from 190 nm to 15 nm with
increasing temperature from 25 1C to 85 1C illustrates rupture
of the reverse vesicular assembly. Notably, an initial increase in
the particle size around 30 1C may be due to the expansion of
the membrane (Scheme 2) by partial unfolding (Fig. 3c). The
powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) pattern (Fig. 3e) of a dried film
generated from the solution of NDI-PY in MCH reveals a sharp
peak in the low angle region (2y = 1.23) corresponding to an
interlayer spacing (d) of 71.2 Å that closely matches twice the
estimated length (Fig. S9, ESI†) of the foldamer (37 Â 2 = 74 Å)
and thus further supports the proposed model for bilayer
formation (Scheme 2). A relatively greater wall thickness
(1.6 nm) of the vesicles (Fig. 2a) compared to the bilayer length
indicates a multi-lamellar structure. A broad peak at around
2y = 23.2 (inset, Fig. 3e) corresponding to a spacing of 3.83 Å
confirms alternate stacking between pyrene and NDI.
A hierarchical assembly of an amide functionalized flexible
D–A dyad has been demonstrated by maneuvering multiple weak
interactions involving H-bonding, CT-interaction, p–p stacking
and solvophobic forces. While a H-bonding driven segregated-
assembly or intra-molecular CT-interaction promoted folding
were the two limiting possibilities, the system smartly adopted
an alternate path of self-organization to form a FD by satisfying
both H-bonding and CT-interaction. Even after significant
progress made in the field of foldamers in general13 and D–A
foldamers,6 understanding their macroscopic assembly14 is yet
to be explored which may have far-reaching consequences for a
more realistic bio-mimicking in terms of structure and function.
Amidst the numerous possibilities, the formation of only a
sequence specific (DAAD) structure that involves intra-chain
folding followed by macroscopic-assembly is reminiscent of
the protein structure by correlating the foldamer, FD and the
bilayer membrane to be synthetic mimics of secondary, tertiary
and quaternary structures of proteins, respectively.15
Fig. 3 (a) MALDI-TOF spectrum (selected region) of a film of NDI-PY
made from a solution in MCH. (b) Emission spectrum of NDI-PY in MCH.
Inset: plot of emission intensity at 448 nm (Fig. S7, ESI†) vs. temperature.
lex = 337 nm, concentration = 0.4 mM, solvent = MCH. (c) Transition
from folded state to partially unfolded state at elevated temperature.
(d) Variation in the particle size with temperature as obtained from the
DLS experiment (Fig. S8, ESI†). C = 0.4 mM. (e) Powder XRD data of dried
NDI-PY powder.
We thank Mr T. Mondal for the NDI-1 sample. AD thanks
CSIR for a research fellowship. SG thanks SERB for the funding
Intriguingly, variable-temperature fluorescence studies (inset, (SR/S1/OC-18/2012).
Fig. 3b and Fig. S7, ESI†) show a gradual increase in the
emission intensity up to B55 1C followed by a sharp decrease
Notes and references
and saturation at B85 1C. The initial increase in the excimer
emission up to 50 1C possibly indicates partial unfolding (not
complete melting) which still can allow PY excimer formation
outside the D–A stack (Fig. 3c) but reduces the possibility of
static quenching by the NDI acceptor. This also accounts for
the decrease in the CT-absorption intensity in the same tem-
perature window (Fig. 1d) at a slow rate possibly due to the
gradual decrease of the relative population of the D units in
the mixed stack. This also corroborates with the observed
(Fig. S7, ESI†) decrease in the CT-emission band (650 nm)
intensity with increasing temperature. However, above
B60 1C, thermal dissociation of the H-bonding leads to the
melting of the whole assembled structure causing a sharp
decrease in the intensity of the excimer emission (inset,
Fig. 3b) as well as CT-absorption (Fig. 1d). The thermorespon-
sive disassembly was also probed using a variable-temperature
1 For reviews on self-assembled p-systems see: (a) F. J. M. Hoeben,
P. Jonkheijm, E. W. Meijer and A. P. H. J. Schenning, Chem. Rev.,
¨
2005, 105, 1491; (b) Z. Chen, A. Lohr, C. R. Saha-Moller and F. Wu¨rthner,
Chem. Soc. Rev., 2009, 38, 564; (c) S. S. Babu, V. K. Praveen and
A. Ajayaghosh, Chem. Rev., 2014, 114, 1973; (d) C. Rest, M. J. Mayoral
´
and G. Fernandez, Int. J. Mol. Sci., 2013, 14, 1541.
2 A. Das and S. Ghosh, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2014, 53, 2038.
3 (a) J. van Herrikhuyzen, A. Syamakumari, A. P. H. J. Schenning and
E. W. Meijer, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2004, 126, 10021; (b) K. Sugiyasu,
S.-i. Kawano, N. Fujita and S. Shinkai, Chem. Mater., 2008, 20, 2863;
(c) A. Das and S. Ghosh, Chem. Commun., 2011, 47, 8922.
4 (a) A. Das, M. R. Molla, B. Maity, D. Koley and S. Ghosh, Chem. – Eur. J.,
2012, 18, 9849; (b) M. R. Molla and S. Ghosh, Chem. – Eur. J., 2012,
18, 9860; (c) H. Kar and S. Ghosh, Chem. Commun., 2014, 50, 1064;
(d) A. Das and S. Ghosh, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2014, 53, 1092.
5 (a) J. R. Moffat and D. K. Smith, Chem. Commun., 2008, 2248;
(b) S. K. M. Nalluri, C. Berdugo, N. J. Pim, W. J. M. Frederix and
R. V. Ulijn, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2014, 53, 1.
6 (a) R. S. Lokey and B. L. Iverson, Nature, 1995, 375, 303;
(b) V. J. Bradford and B. L. Iverson, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2008,
This journal is ©The Royal Society of Chemistry 2014
Chem. Commun., 2014, 50, 11657--11660 | 11659