In all cases studied, silyl migration occurred rapidly, and
the use of methanol promoted the loss of silyl altogether.
The conditions for migration leading to 8 and 9 are
remarkably mild. Regardless of solvent, there was no
evidence of the formation of intermediate structures. Al-
though silyl migration is known,12 in this case it appears to
be facilitated by the combination of the geminally positioned
sulfur, nitrogen, or oxygen and the vicinal hydroxyl.
Table 1. Single-Flask Preparation of Functionalized Azolesa
time
yield erb
Encouraged by the above results, we set out to realize the
eliminative opening of spirodiepoxides (XIV f XVII,
Scheme 3). Proteodesilylation of R-hydroxy silyl enones12,13
entry allene
amide
product (h) conditions (%) (%)
1
2
3
4
5
5
5
C6H6CSNH2
C6H6CONH2
C6H6CNHNH2
C6H6CSNH2
C6H6CNHNH2
10
12
13
10
13
12
48
48
24
48
A
A
B
A
B
80
52
72 >95
76 98
78 >95
97
95
5
11
11
a Conditions A: DMDO/CHCl3, -40 °C to rt, 2 h; 3 equiv amide, MeOH,
rt, then 10 mol % p-TSOH, reflux. Conditions B: DMDO/CHCl3, -40 °C
to rt, 2 h; 5 equiv amide, MeOH, rt. b er (enantiomeric ratio) was determined
by chiral HPLC except for entries 3 and 5, which were based on the dr
(diastereomeric ratio) assessed by Mosher ester analysis.
Scheme 3. Silyl-Directed Eliminative Opening
yield of 79%. The efficiency of this reaction was unexpected,
since acids effect decomposition of nonsilyl spirodiepoxides
to many products.6f,10 Structural analysis (1H NMR) supports
the assignment shown and indicates that benzoate added to
the carbon bearing the silyl substituent. Recently, we reported
a method for synthesizing carbinol-functionalized azoles from
spirodiepoxides.6e Accordingly, treatment of the epoxidation
product derived from allene 5 with thiobenzamide in
chloroform gave a 1:1 ratio of carbinol-functionalized
thiazolines 8a and 8b. Under these conditions, the silyl group
migrated to the adjacent oxygen. Use of methanol instead
of chloroform gave a 1:1 ratio of nonsilyl thiazolines 9a and
9b. Dehydrative aromatization of thiazolines 8 and 9 gave a
single thiazole (10). Crystallographic analysis of 8a con-
firmed the structure of the thioamide and by analogy 6-10,
12, and 13 (Table 1). Thus, silyl substitution dictates both
regio- and stereoselectiVe allene epoxidation and subsequent
regioselectiVe opening of the spirodiepoxide intermediate.
Table 1 catalogs data related to the behavior of enantioen-
triched allenes 5 and 11 and their stereoselective, single-
flask conversion to azoles of types 10, 12, and 13. The
enantiomeric ratios of the products are excellent and reflect
the stereoselectivity of spirodiepoxide formation. Addition
of thiobenzamide and benzamidine gave good yields of
thiazole and imidazole. Benzamide reacted, albeit slowly,
with the spirodiepoxide derived from 5 to give oxazole 12
in modest yield but did not react under these conditions with
the spirodiepoxide derived from 11. The addition is slow in
comparison to addition to nonsilyl spirodiepoxides. This is
despite the presense of methanol, an additive known to
facilitate spirodiepoxide opening.6b,d,11
and site-selective eliminative opening of silyl-substituted
epoxides are known.14,15 We examined this type of elimina-
tion for spirodiepoxides derived from 5, 14, and 15 (Table
2). Brønsted and Lewis acids in polar solvent were found to
effect enone formation (entries 1-3). Interestingly, so did
cyclopentadienyltitanium(IV) chloride in combination with
zinc dust (compare entries 1-3 with 4-6).16,17
In contrast to the titanium-mediated reaction, which favors
the R′-hydroxy-Z-enone product (16-18), the organolithium
and Grignard reagents gave R,ꢀ-dihydroxy olefins directly
(19-21, entries 7-12). Athough difficult to rationalize, the
E/Z selectivity appears to depend on both the substrate
structure and the reagents employed. When methyllithium
was used 21 was isolated in excellent yield (entry 9). The
E/Z geometry strongly favored the E product. No evidence
of the isomeric tertiary alcohol was obtained as only the
(12) (a) Brook, A. G. Acc. Chem. Res. 1974, 7, 77. (b) Moser, W. H.
Tetrahedron 2001, 57, 2065, and references cited therein. (c) Hudrlik, P. F.;
Misra, R. N.; Withers, G. P.; Hudrlik, A. M.; Rona, R. J.; Arcoleo, J. P.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1976, 1453. (d) Hudrlik, P. F.; Schwartz, R. H.; Kulkarni,
A. K. Tetrahedron Lett. 1979, 2233. (e) Hudrlik, P. F.; Nagendrappa, G.;
Kulkarni, A. K.; Hudrlik, A. M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1979, 2237.
(13) (a) Hudrlik, P. F.; Schwartz, R. H.; Hogan, J. C. J. Org. Chem.
1979, 44, 155. (b) Hudrlik, P. F.; Hudrlik, A. M.; Kulkarni, A. K. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1982, 104, 6809. (c) Simpson, G. L.; Heffron, T. P.; Merino,
E.; Jamison, T. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 1056
.
(14) Of special note is the work by Marshall, which constitutes the only
example of eliminative opening of silyl spirodiepoxides. (a) Marshall, J. A.;
Tang, Y. J. Org. Chem. 1993, 58, 3233. (b) Marshall, J. A.; Tang, Y. J.
Org. Chem. 1994, 59, 1457
.
(10) (a) Crandall, J. K.; Machleder, W. H. Tetrahedron Lett. 1966, 48,
6037. (b) Crandall, J. K.; Machleder, W. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1968, 90,
7292. (c) Crandall, J. K.; Machleder, W. H.; Thomas, M. J. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1968, 90, 7346. (d) Crandall, J. K.; Conover, W. W.; Komin, J. B.;
(15) Hudrlik, P. F.; Tafesse, L.; Hudrlik, A. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997,
119, 11689
.
(16) (a) Nugent, W. A.; RajanBabu, T. V. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988,
110, 8561. (b) Barrero, A. F.; Oltra, J. E.; Cuerva, J. M.; Rosales, A. J.
Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 2566. (c) Cuerva, J. M.; Justicia, J.; Oller-Lo´pez,
Machleder, W. H. J. Org. Chem. 1974, 39, 1723
.
(11) Even though methanol was used as solvent no detectable addition
of benzamide, or methanol, was observed (entry 1, Table 1). Solvolytic
spirodiepoxide opening is known for non-silyl-substituted spirodiepoxides;
however, silyl-substituted spirodiepoxides do not undergo ring opening in
alcohols even upon exposure for several days.
J. L.; Bazdi, B.; Oltra, J. E. Mini-ReV. Org. Chem. 2006, 3, 23.
(17) Other reagents surveyed for the eliminative opening, DBU, Et3N,
DIPEA, LDA, NaOH, KO-t-Bu, NaOAc, AcOH, HCl, Cy2BCl, PTSA, LiCl,
and LiClO4, failed to give the desired product or gave results inferior to
those shown in Table 2
.
4674
Org. Lett., Vol. 11, No. 20, 2009