S. Venkatraman et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 19 (2009) 5803–5806
5805
SO2Cl
100
R
100
75
50
25
0
HO
OR2
16
N
CN
a,b
OMe
N
O
SO2
10
1
H
O
60-80%
15
CN
17; R2 = Me
18; R2 =H
O
c
13 Receptor Occupancy
13 Portal Plasma Levels
H2N
OEt
O
Cl
24
0
3
6
9
12
Time (h)
N
H
N
Cl
Figure 3. Portal plasma levels and VLA-4 receptor occupancy in rats following oral
dosing of 13 at 5 mpk.
19
d,e
60-70%
R
As a prelude to evaluating 3,3-difluoropiperdine 13 in animal
models of autoimmune and allergic diseases, the receptor occu-
pancy and pharmacokinetics were measured (Fig. 3). While the
systemic pharmacokinetics were poor for 13 (AUC and Cmax could
not be determined; Clp >100 mL/min/kg; F <5%), portal plasma lev-
els provided an AUC of 50 nM h and a Cmax of 27 nM. Although the
drug levels were low, the Cmax was 75-fold over the average con-
centration of VLA-4 receptors in the rat (300 pM). Furthermore,
in the receptor occupancy assay, 13 achieved 70% occupancy at
12 h and 40% occupancy at 24 h (Fig. 2). The initial exposure of
13 to circulating leukocytes bearing VLA-4 in the portal vein and
slow off-rate likely compensate for the poor systemic pharmacoki-
netics to provide receptor occupancy coverage even after the drug
levels can no longer be detected. The correlation between receptor
occupancy and efficacy in animal models and human is well
documented.8
Furthermore, when 13 was dosed as the ethyl ester prodrug at
1.5 mpk in rats, it yielded receptor occupancy values of 88% and
60% at 12 h and 24 h, respectively. This is in contrast to the parent
acid which, when dosed at 5 mpk orally in rats, gave receptor occu-
pancy values of 65% and 22% at 12 h and 24 h, respectively. The
ethyl ester prodrug of 13 also had higher receptor occupancy com-
pared to the ethyl ester prodrug of 1 at 1.5 mpk over 24 h as shown
in Figure 4.
O
H
N
OH
N
O
SO2
O
Cl
N
H
N
CN
Cl
2-14
Scheme 1. Reagents and conditions: (a) 15, Et3N, CH2Cl2; (b) TfO2, iPrEtN, CH2Cl2,
ꢀ60 °C, 2 h then R, iPrEtN ꢀ20 °C to rt, 12 h; (c) LiOH, CH3CN/H2O; (d) 18, EDC,
HOBT, Et3 N, DMF; (e) LiOH, CH3CN/H2O.
provided a triflate. This was displaced with a variety of commercially
available cyclic tertiary amines (R) to provide 17 in one pot.9 Hydro-
lysis of the methyl ester 17 by reaction with lithium hydroxide affor-
ded the corresponding acids 18. Standard peptide coupling of these
acids 18 with N-isonicotinoyl-(L)-4-aminophenylalanine (19) using
1-(3-dimethylamino-propyl)-3-ethylcarbodiimide hydrochloride
(EDC) and 1-hydroxybenzotriazole hydrate (HOBT) followed by
hydrolysis of the ethyl ester in the presence of lithium hydroxide
delivered the final acids 2–14.11
In summary, we have developed a novel series of potent prolyl
dipeptide VLA-4 antagonists containing fluorinated cyclic tertiary
amines at the proline 4-position. In general, the fluorinated cyclic
tertiary amines provided improved potency and receptor occu-
pancy levels when compared with their des-fluoro analogues and
the initial cyclobutyl amine lead compound. An optimal compound
from this work is 3,3-difluoropiperdine 13 (MK-0617) with an IC50
value of 0.03 nM and a receptor occupancy on both activated and
non-activated VLA-4 receptors of ꢁ90% at 3 h. Dosed orally as its
ethyl ester prodrug to rats, 13 had low systemic exposure but
excellent receptor occupancy at 24 h due to its slow off-rate.
The fluorinated and non-fluorinated cyclic tertiary amine-dipep-
tide derivatives were prepared as outlined in Scheme 1. The synthe-
sis began with commercially available cis-4-hydroxy-L-proline
methyl ester (15) which was sulfonylated with 3-cyano-sulfonyl-
chloride (16). Exposure of the resulting sulfonamide to triflic anhy-
dride (Tf2O) in the presence of diisopropylethyl amine at ꢀ60 °C
100
88%
Acknowledgments
75
60%
77%
We acknowledge the contributions of many members of the la-
beled synthesis group and the Laboratory of Animal Resources of
Merck Research Laboratories.
50
25%
25
References and notes
Ethyl ester prodrug of 1
0
Ethyl ester prodrug of 13
1. Hemler, M. E.; Elices, M. J.; Parker, C.; Takada, Y. Immunol. Rev. 1990, 114, 45.
2. Elices, M. J. Curr. Opin. Anti-infamm. Immunol. 1999, 1, 15.
3. (a) Kent, S. J.; Karlik, S. J.; Cannon, C.; Hines, D. K.; Yednock, T. A.; Fritz, L. C.;
Horner, H. C. J. Neuroimmunol. 1995, 58, 1; (b) Honey, K. J. Clin. Invest. 2008, 118,
825.
3
6
9
12
24
Time (h)
4. For Asthma see: (a) Sielszak, M. W.; Ahmed, A.; Cortes, A.; Lauredo, I. T.;
Kim, J.; Pepinsky, B.; Beenjamin, C. D.; Leone, D. R.; Lobb, R. R.; Weller,
Figure 4. Rat Receptor occupancy of 1 and 13 following oral dosing of ester
prodrugs at 1.5 mpk.