Lash et al.
JOCNote
are nonaromatic. These include porphomethenes 6, porpho-
dimethenes 7,16 phlorins,17 isophlorins,18 isoporphyrins 8,19
and the formally antiaromatic didehydroporphyrins 9.20
Although initial interests in hydroporphyrins like 6 and 7
primarily related to their intermediacy in porphyrin syn-
theses,21 gem-disubstituted derivatives have been widely
studied in recent years for molecular recognition and anion
binding studies.22 It is worth noting that these systems are
generally more stable in their protonated forms. Some years
ago we reported a synthesis of calix[4]azulene 10a, a non-
conjugated macrocycle that shares the same carbon skeleton
of quatyrin.23 Although the formation of a quatyrin-like
system from 10a is unlikely, the preparation of structures
resembling 6-8 is far more plausible. In this report, we
further explore the synthesis of calixazulenes and their
conversion into hydroporphyrin analogues.
SCHEME 1
The synthesis of porphyrins commonly relies on the ability
of pyrroles to undergo electrophilic substitution at the
R-positions and thereby generate the required carbon-
carbon bonds to form the macrocycle.21 Azulene (11a) also
readily undergoes electrophilic substitution at the equivalent
1,3-positions and this property can be used to synthesize
porphyrin analogue systems.12,24-29 This principle was used
to generate tripyrrane analogues that could be used in the
synthesis of azuliporphyrins and related systems.12,24,25 In
addition, a one-pot synthesis of tetraarylazuliporphyrins
was developed where mixtures of azulene, pyrrole, and
arylaldehydes could be condensed in the presence of
BF3 Et2O, followed by oxidation with DDQ, to directly
3
afford the azuliporphyrins.26-28 However, initial attempts to
(12) Graham, S. R.; Colby, D. A.; Lash, T. D. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2002, 41, 1371–1374. The synthesis of resorcinol-derived dicarbaporphyr-
inoids has also been noted: Xu, L.; Lash, T. D. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006, 47,
8863–8866.
prepare calix[4]azulene 10a from azulene proved to be diffi-
cult due to poor yields and problems encountered in puri-
fication.23 Reaction of 11a with paraformaldehyde in the
presence of acid catalysts gave moderate yields of impure 10a
that was contaminated with the related calix[5]azulene, and
attempts to purify the product by column chromatography
on silica or alumina led to extensive degradation.23 During
the course of these investigations, stepwise routes to 10a were
considered. Azulene reacts with phosphorus oxychloride and
DMF at 80 °C to give dialdehyde 12,30 and this was reduced
with sodium borohydride in an attempt to form dicarbinol
13. However, these reductions gave diazulene dialcohol 14 as
the major product. This result was unexpected but can be
rationalized by the mechanism shown in Scheme 1. Follow-
ing initial reduction to give 13, the formation of a carboca-
tion species could be envisaged and subsequent ipso-
substitution onto a second dicarbinol and elimination of
formaldehyde would give the bridged diazulene 14.
Although this product could be identified by NMR spectro-
scopy, it could not be isolated in pure form. Attempts to
purify 14 by chromatography on alumina or silica again led
to decomposition and immediate color changes (blue to
pink) were evident. Due to these difficulties, alternative
materials for carrying out chromatographic purifications
were explored. Florisil proved to give remarkable results,
although this magnesium silicate did not allow us to isolate
(13) For examplesofrelateddoubly N-confused porphyrins, see: (a) Furuta,
H.; Maeda, H.; Osuka, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 803–807. (b) Maeda, H.;
Osuka, A.; Furuta, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 15690–15691.
(14) Lash, T. D.; Colby, D. A.; Idate, A. S.; Davis, R. N. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2007, 129, 13801–13802.
(15) Zhang, Z.; Ferrence, G. M.; Lash, T. D. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 101–104.
(16) (a) Fontecave, M.; Battioni, J. P.; Mansuy, D. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1984, 106, 5217–5222. (b) Burns, D. H.; Li, Y.-H.; Shi, D. C.; Caldwell, T. M.
J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 4536–4546.
(17) (a) Woodward, R. B. Ind. Chim. Belge 1962, 27, 1293–1308. (b)
Whitlock, H. W.; Oester, M. Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1973, 95, 5738–5741. (c)
Jeandon, C.; Krattinger, B.; Ruppert, R.; Callot, H. J. Inorg. Chem. 2001, 40,
3149–3153. (d) O’Brien, A. Y.; McGann, J. P.; Geier, G. R. III J. Org. Chem.
2007, 72, 4084–4092.
(18) Liu, C.; Shen, D.-M.; Chen, Q.-Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129,
5814–5815.
(19) (a) Barkigia, K. M.; Renner, M. W.; Xie, H.; Smith, K. M.; Fajer, J.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 7894–7895. (b) Gentemann, S.; Leung, S. H.;
Smith, K. M.; Fajer, J.; Holten, D. J. Phys. Chem. 1995, 99, 4330–4334.
(20) Yamamoto, Y.; Yamamoto, A.; Furuta, S.; Horie, M.; Kodama, M.;
Sato, W.; Akiba, K.; Tsuzuki, S.; Uchimaru, T.; Hashizume, D.; Iwasaki, F.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 14540–14541.
(21) Lash, T. D. Chem.;Eur. J. 1996, 2, 1197–1200.
ꢀ
(22) (a) Bucher, C.; Seidel, D.; Lynch, V.; Kral, V.; Sessler, J. L. Org. Lett.
ꢀ
2000, 2, 3103–3106. (b) Bernatkova, M.; Dvorakova, H.; Andrioletti, B.;
Kral, V.; Bour, P. J. Phys. Chem. A 2005, 109, 5518–5526.
ꢀ
ꢀ
ꢀ
ꢀ
(23) Colby, D. A.; Lash, T. D. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 1031–1033.
(24) Lash, T. D.; Colby, D. A.; Graham, S. R.; Chaney, S. T. J. Org.
Chem. 2004, 69, 8851–8864.
(25) Lash, T. D.; El-Beck, J. A.; Ferrence, G. M. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72,
8402–8415.
(26) Colby, D. A.; Lash, T. D. Chem.;Eur. J. 2002, 8, 5397–5402.
(27) Lash, T. D.; Colby, D. A.; Ferrence, G. M. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2003,
4533–4548.
(28) El-Beck, J. A.; Lash, T. D. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 3981–3190.
(29) The original synthesis of azuliporphyrins involved a “3þ1” conden-
sation of 1,3-azulene dicarbaldehyde with a tripyrrane. See: Lash, T. D.;
Chaney, S. T. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1997, 36, 839–840.
(30) Hafner, K.; Bernhard, C. Liebigs Ann. Chem. 1959, 625, 108–123.
J. Org. Chem. Vol. 74, No. 22, 2009 8831