4856
Y. Okada, S. Nakano / Inorganica Chimica Acta 362 (2009) 4853–4856
Table 4
between the highest and lowest value was much greater than
due to the conventional heating. These results show that the yields
for substituted ferrocenes were higher than those for the unsubsti-
tuted ferrocene. Namely, no relationship was recognized between
the yields and the substituents. This would be due to the fact that
the substituted ferrocenes possessing a dipole moment are liable to
absorb the microwaves, whereas the unsubstituted ferrocene ab-
sorbs very little. The ratio of the products (A) and (B) was similar
for the microwave irradiation and conventional heating conditions.
One or more of ferrocene, mesitylene and aluminum(III) chlo-
ride were dissolved in the solvent, and irradiated by the micro-
waves. The temperature versus irradiation time plot is shown in
Fig. 1, in which the microwave power and the amount of these sub-
stances were the same for the ligand exchange reaction. For the
substrates alone or the catalyst alone, a marked increase in the
temperature was not found. For the mixture of ferrocene or mesit-
ylene and aluminum chloride, however, the temperature increased
as well as for the exchange reaction. These results would indicate
that the microwave energy is absorbed by the complex between
the ferrocenes or mesitylene and Lewis acid. The boiling point of
1,2-dichloromethane is 83.5–84.0 °C. In this microwave irradiation
experiment, the maximum temperature was 84.7 °C, suggesting
superheating. Furthermore, as mentioned in the introduction, the
active species of this reaction is the adduct between the ferrocene
and Lewis acid. Since this species should effectively absorb micro-
wave energy, the temperature is much higher near the formed ad-
duct. The significant reaction accelerating effect would be affected
by such a high temperature.
The ratios of (A) and (B) for the ligand exchange between the ferrocene derivatives
and mesitylene under microwave irradiation or conventional heating.
Products
Microwave irradiation
Conventional heating
(A) %
(B) %
(A) %
(B) %
t-Butylferrocene
Ethylferrocene
Phenylferrocene
(4-Methylphenyl)ferrocene
33.3
69.5
80.8
75.3
66.7
30.5
19.2
24.7
35.1
57.9
67.3
80.0
64.9
42.1
32.7
20.0
Fig. 1. The temperature versus irradiation time plot when microwaves was
irradiated to one or more of ferrocene, mesitylene and aluminum(III) chloride in
1,2-dichloromethane: h: mesitylene, s: ferrocene, N: aluminum(III) chloride, ꢀ:
mesitylene + ferrocene, j: mesitylene + aluminum(III) chloride, d: ferrocene + alu-
minum(III) chloride.
References
[1] Y. Okada, Y. Nakajima, J. Oleo Sci. 54 (2005) 655.
[2] A.N. Nesmeyanov, N.A. Vol’kenau, L.S. Isaeva, Dokl. Chem. 176 (1967) 106.
[3] D. Astruc, R. Dabrd, J. Organomet. Chem. 111 (1976) 33.
[4] D. Astruc, R. Dabrd, Tetrahedron 39 (1976) 4027.
[5] T. Hayashi, Y. Okada, S. Shimizu, Transition Metal Chem. 21 (1996) 418.
[6] Y. Okada, Y. Yoshigami, T. Hayashi, Transition Metal Chem. 28 (2003) 794.
[7] For Example: A.R. Kappe, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 43 (2004) 6250.
[8] Q. Dabirmanesh, S.I.S. Fernando, R.M.G. Roberts, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. I
(1995) 743.
[9] P.deL.A.G. Cordo, A.L.P.C. Godoy, M.S. Zabaglia, S.A. Cardoso, M.L.A.E. Silva, A.F.
Neto, Anais. Assoc. Bras. Quim. 52 (2003) 7.
[10] T. Leigh, J. Chem. Soc. (1964) 3294.
[11] T. Hayashi, Y. Okada, T. Fukuchi, Nippon Kagaku Kaishi (1994) 340.
[12] G.D. Broadhead, P.L. Pauson, J. Chem. Soc. (1955) 367.
change in the yield was discussed. The results of the ligand ex-
change reactions during the microwave irradiation are shown to-
gether with those due to the conventional heating in Table 3. The
ratios of the products (A) and (B) are summarized at Table 4. The
highest yield by conventional heating was 55.0% for t-butylferro-
cene, and the lowest value was 13.2% for (p-methylphenyl)ferro-
cene. These results are due to the electron-donating ability of the
substituents. On the contrary, under microwave irradiation condi-
tions, the highest value was 44.3% for ethylferrocene, and the low-
est value was 31.3% for unsubstituted ferrocene. The difference