6194
K. Balamurugan et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 50 (2009) 6191–6195
N
X
X
X
N
S8/B
S
S
NH2
S
S
Ar
Ar
S
Ar
3'
4
5'
Scheme 4. Non-formation of regioisomer 30 from 4.
an agar dilution method and MICs of the synthesized compounds
along with the standard drugs for comparison are reported (Table
1). In the first phase of screening against MTB, all the compounds
showed good in vitro activity with MICs ranging from 1.1 to
chase of a high resolution NMR spectrometer and (ii) FIST program
and the University Grants Commission, New Delhi, for funds under
the DRS and ASIST programs.
97.5
ranging from 1.1 to 43.0
(MIC: 50.8 M). Three compounds (3b, 3d, and 3f) with MICs of
4.9, 2.3, and 1.1 M were more potent than first line anti-TB drug,
ethambutol (MIC: 7.6 M). Ethyl 2-amino-5-(1-naphthyl)thie-
no[2,3-b]thiophene-3-carboxylate (3f), the most active compound
in vitro with MIC of 1.1 M against MTB, was 7 and 45 times more
l
M. All compounds, except 3g, were more active with MICs
Supplementary data
l
M than standard drug pyrazinamide
l
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in
l
l
References and notes
l
potent than ethambutol and pyrazinamide, respectively, but less
active than isoniazid and rifampicin.
Subsequently, all the synthesized compounds were evaluated
against MDR-TB which inhibited it with MICs ranging from 1.1 to
1. Gewald, K.; Schink, E.; Bottcher, H. Z. Chem. Ber. 1966, 99, 94–100.
2. Sabnis, R. W.; Rangnekar, D. W.; Sonawane, N. D. J. Heterocycl. Chem. 1999, 36,
333–345.
3. Romagnoli, R.; Baraldi, P. G.; Carrion, M. D.; Cara, C. L.; Preti, D.; Fruttarolo, F.;
Pavani, M. G.; Tabrizi, M. A.; Tolomeo, M.; Grimaudo, S.; Cristina, A. D. J. Med.
Chem. 2007, 50, 2273–2277.
4. Pinkerton, A. B.; Lee, T. T.; Hoffman, T. Z.; Wang, Y.; Kahraman, M.; Cook, T. G.;
Severance, D.; Gahman, T. C.; Noble, S. A.; Shiau, A. K.; Davis, R. L. Bioorg. Med.
Chem. Lett. 2007, 17, 3562–3569.
5. Nikolakopoulos, G.; Figler, H.; Linden, J.; Scammells, P. J. Bioorg. Med. Chem.
2006, 14, 2358–2365.
6. LaPorte, M. G.; Lessen, T. A.; Leister, L.; Cebzanov, D.; Amparo, E.; Faust, C.;
Ortlip, D.; Bailey, T. R.; Nitz, T. J.; Chunduru, S. K.; Young, D. C.; Burns, C. J.
Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2006, 16, 100–103.
7. Andersen, H. S.; Olsen, O. H.; Iversen, L. F.; Sørensen, A. L. P.; Mortensen, S. B.;
Christensen, M. S.; Branner, S.; Hansen, T. K.; Lau, J. F.; Jeppesen, L.; Moran, E. J.;
Su, J.; Bakir, F.; Judge, L.; Shahbaz, M.; Collins, T.; Vo, T.; Newman, M. J.; Ripka,
W. C.; Moller, N. P. H. J. Med. Chem. 2002, 45, 4443–4459.
>97.5
4.0, 2.3. 4.2, 1.1, and 5.1
against MDR-TB than the anti-TB drug isoniazid (MIC: 11.4
Two compounds 3d and 3f with MICs of 2.3 and 1.1 M showed
greater activity against MDR-TB than rifampicin (MIC: 3.8 M).
Eleven compounds were found to be more active (1.5 - 55.5 times)
than ethambutol (MIC: 61.2 M), while all the twelve compounds
screened were more active (4–370 times) than pyrazinamide (MIC:
406.1 M). The compound 3f displayed maximum activity in vitro
with MIC of 1.1 M against MDR-TB, which are 10 and 3 times
l
M. Five compounds, 3b, 3d, 3e, 3f, and 3l, with MICs of
M, respectively, were more potent
M).
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
more potent than isoniazid and rifampicin, respectively.
Two clear trends are discernible upon examination of the anti-
tubercular activity of the compounds screened (Table 1) from
structure–activity point of view.
8. Gutschow, M.; Kuerschner, L.; Neumann, U.; Pietsch, M.; Loser, R.; Koglin, N.;
Eger, K. J. Med. Chem. 1999, 42, 5437–5447.
9. Koike, K.; Jia, Z.; Nikaido, T.; Liu, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Guo, D. Org. Lett. 1999, 1, 197–198.
10. Castanedo, G. M.; Sutherlin, D. P. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 7181–7184.
11. Gottschlich, R.; Leibrock, J.; Noe, C. R.; Berger, M.; Buchstaller, H.-P. Eur. Pat.
Appl. EP 717044, 1996; Chem. Abstr. 1996, 125, 114585.
12. Modica, M.; Santiagati, M.; Russo, F.; Parotti, L.; Gioia, L. D.; Selvaggini, C.;
Salmona, M.; Mennini, T. J. Med. Chem. 1997, 40, 574–585.
13. Iversen, L. F.; Anderson, H. S.; Branner, S.; Mortensen, S. B.; Peters, G. H.; Norris,
K.; Olsen, O. H.; Jeppesen, C. B.; Lundt, B. F.; Ripka, W.; Moller, K. B.; Moller, N.
P. H. J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275, 10300–10307.
14. Webb, T. R.; Melman, N.; Ji, X.; Jacobson, K. A. Chem. Lett. 2000, 10, 31.
15. Fujita, M.; Hirayama, T.; Ikeda, N. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2002, 10, 3113–3122.
18. (a) Indumathi, S.; Ranjith Kumar, R.; Perumal, S. Tetrahedron 2007, 63, 1411–
1416; (b) Srinivasan, M.; Perumal, S. Tetrahedron 2007, 63, 2865–2874; (c)
Kamal Nasar, M.; Ranjith Kumar, R.; Perumal, S. Tetrahedron Lett. 2007, 48,
2155–2158; (d) Karthikeyan, S. V.; Perumal, S. Tetrahedron Lett. 2007, 48,
2261–2265; (e) Ranjith Kumar, R.; Perumal, S. Tetrahedron 2007, 63, 12220–
12231; (f) Savitha Devi, N.; Perumal, S. Tetrahedron Lett. 2007, 48, 5627–5629.
19. (a) Ranjith Kumar, R.; Perumal, S.; Senthilkumar, P.; Yogeeswari, P.; Sriram, D. J.
Med. Chem. 2008, 51, 5731–5735; (b) Ranjith Kumar, R.; Perumal, S.;
Senthilkumar, P.; Yogeeswari, P.; Sriram, D. Tetrahedron 2008, 64, 2962–
2971; (c) Ranjith Kumar, R.; Perumal, S.; Senthilkumar, P.; Yogeeswari, P.;
Sriram, D. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2007, 17, 6459–6462; (d) Karthikeyan, S. V.;
Perumal, S.; Krithika, A. S.; Yogeeswari, P.; Sriram, D. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett.
2009, 19, 3006–3009; (e) Ranjith Kumar, R.; Perumal, S.; Manju, S. C.; Bhatt, P.;
Yogeeswari, P.; Sriram, D. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2009, 19, 3461–3465; (f)
Ranjith Kumar, R.; Perumal, S.; Senthilkumar, P.; Yogeeswari, P.; Sriram, D. Eur.
J. Med. Chem. 2009, 44, 3821–3829.
(1) Compounds with X = COOEt (3a–3f) possess more activity
against both MTB and MDR-TB than compounds with
X = CN (3g–3l). In both these sets of compounds, 3f and 3l
with 1-naphthyl ring displayed maximum activity against
both MTB and MDR-TB.
(2) Among the aryl groups in both sets of compounds, the same
order of activity viz. 1-naphthyl > p-PriC6H4 > p-MeC6H4 >
C6H5 is found against MTB as well as MDR-TB which probably
indicates that the lipophilicity and/or steric bulk of the
compounds is an important factor underlying the activity.
In conclusion, the present work describes a facile one-pot
protocol for the regioselective synthesis of a new series of 2-ami-
no-5-arylthieno[2,3-b]thiophenes 3 via domino Gewald reaction–
dehydrogenation sequence. These reactions occur expediently
under microwave irradiation affording a higher yield of the thieno-
thiophenes than the thermal method. These 2-amino-5-arylthieno-
[2,3-b]thiophenes also displayed good in vitro antimycobacterial
activity against MTB and MDR-TB.
20. Egbertson, M. S.; Cook, J. J.; Bednar, B.; Prugh, J. D.; Bednar, R. A.; Gaul, S. L.;
Gould, R. J.; Hartman, G. D.; Homnick, C. F.; Holahan, M. A.; Libby, L. A.; Lynch, J.
J.; Sitko, G. R.; Stranieri, M. T.; Vassallo, L. M. J. Med. Chem. 1999, 42, 2409–
2421.
21. Prugh, J. D.; Gould, R. J.; Lynch, R. J.; Zhang, G.; Cook, J. J.; Holahan, M. A.;
Stranieri, M. T.; Sitko, G. R.; Gaul, S. L.; Bednar, R. A.; Bednar, B.; Hartman, G. D.
Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 1997, 7, 865–870.
Acknowledgments
S.P. thanks the Department of Science and Technology, New
Delhi, for funding for a major research project (No. SR/S1/OC-70/
2006) and for funds under (i) IRHPA program for funds for the pur-