.
Angewandte
Communications
Table 1: Surfactant screening.
Pd
Conv.[b]
[%]
Ratio
E
Entry
Solvent
source[a]
Z
Alkane
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
water
Pd(OAc)2
Pd(OAc)2
Pd(OAc)2
Pd(OAc)2
Pd(OAc)2
Pd(OAc)2
Pd(OAc)2
PdI2
Pd(OAc)2
Pd(OAc)2
Pd(OAc)2
Pd(OAc)2
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
58
25
25
0
25
25
0
25
14
28
5
5
5
7
4
50
50
100
25
72
58
<1
<1
5
cremophore[c]
Brij 30[c]
Triton X-100[c]
SDS[c]
50
14
14
95
95
90
50
96
89
SPGS[c]
TPGS[c]
TPGS[c]
TPGS[d]
DME
Figure 1. Cryo-TEM image showing palladium nanoparticles (dark;
arrows) aggregated around spherical nanomicelles in water.
9
10
11
12
1
<1
3
MeCN
THF
8
9
With stirring at room temperature, the mixture turns to
a black, seemingly homogeneous aqueous solution in which
spherical micelles aggregate around palladium nanoparticles
generated by the NaBH4 (Figure 1). The newly formed H2
seeks preferential dissolution within the lipophilic micellar
cores, although adsorption onto the surface of the metal is
also likely. Introduction of an alkyne leads to its dissolution
within surfactant nanoreactors that interact with palladium.
Reduction to Z-olefinic products then occurs at room
temperature in about one hour in excellent yields. Stock
solutions of this reagent can be stored and used over time.[17]
Curiously, while several other salts or complexes of
Group 10 metals (e.g., NiCl2, Ni(OAc)2, [Pd2(dba)3]) were
either inactive or led to mixtures of E and Z alkenes and
alkanes,[18] PdCl2 resulted in the quantitative reduction to the
corresponding alkane (Scheme 3). Alternatively, the same
over-reduction is observed using a balloon of hydrogen gas in
place of prior reduction of Pd(OAc)2 with NaBH4.
8
All reactions were run at a substrate concentration of 0.5m; ratios were
determined by GC-MS and confirmed by H NMR spectroscopy.
[a] 1 mol% Pd. [b] Determined by GC-MS. [c] 2 wt% solution. [d] 5 wt%
solution.
1
6). To assess overall scope, an expanded study was undertaken
examining several types of alkynes, including unsymmetri-
cally disubstituted, terminal, and conjugated cases (Table 2).
Additional examples of propargylic and homopropargylic
alcohols and their ester derivatives were very amenable to
semireduction (Table 2, entries 1–5), as was the correspond-
ing acetal (entry 6). A conjugated aryl alkyl alkyne (Table 2,
entry 7) afforded the corresponding styrenyl array in a Z to E
ratio of 95:5. Characteristic of this chemistry in water, free
hydroxy and amino groups (Table 2, entries 1, 4, 5, 7, and 15)
presented no obvious limitations. Other conjugated acety-
lenes bearing ester moieties led to more than 95% of the
desired Z-configured a,b-unsaturated esters, including those
containing ketone (Table 2, entry 10) and epoxide (entry 11)
residues. Terminal alkynes (entries 12–15) reacted to afford
the targeted monosubstituted alkenes. While stereodefined
centers present in a-amino acids such as proline and alanine
derivatives (Table 2, entries 13 and 14) remained fully intact,
as did their N-Cbz groups, some reduction of the olefin in an
acrylate was observed, leading to a drop in the yield
(entry 12). Interestingly, a representative silylalkyne was
fully inert to these semihydrogenation conditions (Table 2,
entry 16), which could be used to synthetic advantage.
Another major characteristic of this process is the
opportunity to recycle the contents of the entire reaction
mixture. Once the reduction is complete, in-flask extraction
with a single organic solvent allows the isolation and eventual
purification of the desired product. Both a typical reaction
mixture and the in-flask extraction with an ethereal solvent
(Et2O or MTBE) or hydrocarbon (e.g., hexanes) are shown in
Figure 2. Remaining in the water are the surfactant, LiCl, and
the palladium catalyst. Addition of fresh NaBH4 (0.35 equiv)
leads to an active catalyst ready for re-introduction of the
starting material. As illustrated in Scheme 4, this process
could be repeated five times without a change in yield or
Scheme 3. Full reduction of alkyne using PdCl2.
When functionalized alkynes, for example, propargylic
alcohols, were exposed to our standard conditions, far lower
Z selectivities were observed. Fortunately, we discovered that
under otherwise identical conditions but in the presence of
LiCl (2 equiv), both the yields and extent of Z-alkene
formation are very high. Neither other salts of lithium
(LiBr, Li2CO3, LiOH), nor sodium (NaCl), were nearly as
effective as this additive.[19]
The choice of TPGS-750-M as surfactant was also shown
to be critical in its key role as reaction solvent (Table 1). Thus,
while the corresponding hydrogenation “on water”[20] (i.e., in
the absence of the surfactant) afforded mostly the over-
reduced, saturated product (Table 1, entry 1), none of the
alternative commercially available surfactants led to the
desired Z alkene in synthetically useful amounts (entries 2–
2
ꢀ 2014 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 1 – 5
These are not the final page numbers!