We came across a report by Sauer and Mayer where the
thermolysis of 3-phenyl-1,4,2-dioxazol-5-one 1 produced
sulfoximine 2 along with symmetrical urea 3 (Scheme 1).12
The fact that rearrangement occurred under such mild
conditions sharply contrasted with the reported high temperature
required for the thermolysis (Scheme 1). Our screen of various
solvents revealed that conversion and purity was optimal in
acetonitrile15 and that 1 could be secured by performing the
CDI reaction in toluene at 0 °C. Moreover, control experiments
established that imidazole was essential for the conversion of
dioxazolone 1 into phenylisocyanate 5.
Scheme 1.
Thermolysis of 3-Phenyl-1,4,2-dioxazol-5-one 112
As this CDI-mediated Lossen rearrangement compared
favorably with established conditions, we evaluated the
electronic requirements of the reaction. The conversion of
various para-substituted phenyl hydroxamic acids into the
corresponding Cbz carbamates was thus investigated (Table
1). Accordingly, treatment of hydroxamic acid 4a with CDI
The latter was proposed to form through the addition of
aniline, from the partial decomposition of phenylisocyanate
with residual water, onto isocyanate 5. Inspired by their
results, we hoped to optimize the oxidative rearrangement
pathway via the screening of various additives.
Although dioxazolone 1 can be prepared by treatment of
benzohydroxamic acid 4a with phosgene,13 we sought a less
hazardous phosgene equivalent. Initial experiments using
carbonyldiimidazole (CDI) in acetonitrile led to the formation
of dioxazolone 1 within 10 min at ambient temperature.
Surprisingly, partial conversion to N-phenyl-1H-imidazole-
1-carboxamide 6 by way of addition of imidazole to
phenylisocyanate 5 was also observed under these conditions
(Scheme 2).14 Complete conversion of dioxazolone 1 to urea
Table 1. Lossen Rearrangement of para-Substituted Phenyl
Hydroxamic Acidsa
entry
X
cmpd
time of rearrangement
yield (%)b
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
H
a
b
c
d
e
f
15 min
<5 min
<5 min
10 min
40 min
40 min
24 h
93
99
93
82
85
81
5c
NMe2
OMe
Me
CI
F
NO2
g
Scheme 2
.
CDI-Mediated Formation of 1 and Subsequent
a Conditions: hydroxamic acid (1.0 equiv), CDI (1.2 equiv), BnOH (3
Rearrangement
equiv). b Isolated yield. c Conversion by HPLC.
and heating the reaction mixture to 60 °C led to the smooth
formation of the desired isocyanate over the course of a few
minutes, with the Cbz-protected aniline 7a being isolated in
high yield after a simple aqueous workup.16 Whereas the
rearrangement of electron-rich arenes was complete upon
reaching 60 °C (entries 1-4), the conversion was signifi-
cantly affected by the presence of electron-withdrawing
substituents (entries 5-7). As expected, the rate of rear-
rangement proved to be proportional to the electron density
of the migrating group.17,18
6 could be achieved within 15 min by heating the reaction
mixture to 60 °C.
Having confirmed the electronic nature of the rearrange-
ment, a broader study of the scope revealed the generality
of the method (Table 2). The capture of isocyanates with
morpholine typically provides ureas in quantitative yield.19
We thus opted for a consistent use of this nucleophile to
evaluate the efficiency of the oxidative rearrangement itself.
(9) For selected examples, see: (a) Wallace, R. G.; Barker, J. M.; Wood,
M. L. Synthesis 1990, 1143. (b) Bachman, G. B.; Goldmacher, J. E. J. Org.
Chem. 1964, 29, 2576. (c) Hoare, D. G.; Olson, A.; Koshland, D. E., Jr.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1968, 90, 1638. (d) Bittner, S.; Grinberg, S.; Kartoon,
I. Tetrahedron Lett. 1974, 23, 1965. (e) King, F. D.; Pike, S.; Walton,
D. R. M. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1978, 3521. (f) Salomon, C. J.;
Breuer, E. J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 3858. (g) Pihuleac, J.; Bauer, L. Synthesis
1989, 61. (h) Burungule, A. S.; Bondge, S. P.; Munde, S. B.; Bhingolikar,
V. E.; Mane, R. A. Synth. Commun. 2003, 33, 1923.
(10) (a) Stafford, J. A.; Gonzales, S. S.; Barrett, D. G.; Suh, E. M.;
Feldman, P. L. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 10040. (b) Anilkumar, R.;
Chandrasekhar, S.; Sridhar, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 5291. (c) Miller,
M. J.; Loudon, G. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1975, 97, 5295.
(15) Other solvents led to lower conversion of 4a after 2 h: toluene
(50%), THF (90%), EtOAc (60%), dichloroethane (55%).
(16) See Supporting Information.
(17) For a comparative rate study of Hofmann rearrangements, see:
(11) Marzoni, G.; Varney, M. D. Org. Process Res. DeV. 1997, 1, 81.
(12) Sauer, J.; Mayer, K. K. Tetrahedron Lett. 1968, 3, 319.
(13) Beck, G. Chem Ber. 1951, 84, 688.
Hauser, C. R.; Renfrow, W. B., Jr. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1937, 59, 121.
(18) For rate studies of the Lossen rearrangement, see: (a) Swenson,
J. S.; Davis, A. M.; Deyo, R. A.; Graham, B. W.; Jahn, E. P.; Mattice,
J. D. J. Org. Chem. 1973, 38, 3956. (b) Bright, R. D.; Hauser, C. R. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1939, 61, 618. (c) Renfrow, W. B., Jr.; Hauser, C. R. J. Am.
(14) Such a rearrangement was proposed to explain the decomposition
of R-hydroxy hydroxamic acids. Geffken, D. Liebigs Ann. Chem. 1982,
211.
Chem. Soc. 1937, 59, 2308
.
Org. Lett., Vol. 11, No. 24, 2009
5623