Figure 1. Proposed transition-state model.
olefin-bearing substrate 1k proceeded to afford 2k with good
yield and enantiomeric excess (entry 11).
site a instead of site b to maximize the interaction of the
chiral element of the ligand with the aryl olefin in the
formation of the first chiral center. The additional benzene
ring of the quinoline moiety is crucial to offer steric bulkiness
that constrains the orientation of the Pd-bound substrate. Prior
to amidopalladation, site b would be released by dissociation
of the counterion and occupied by the aryl-substituted olefin
(substrate). Since cyclization proceeds through a syn-ami-
dopalladation, four different transition states (TS) originating
from intermediate I are considered. Si-face cyclization of I
leading to TS A is disfavored due to steric repulsion between
the cinnamyl moiety of substrate and the tert-butyl group of
L9. In contrast, formation of TS B is favored through Re-
face cyclization. In this case, the orientation of the cinnamyl
group of the substrate is sterically matched with the chiral
environment of L9. However, when the substrate is turned
upside down, the resulting TS C and D are disfavored and
nonproductive since the cinnamyl group of the substrate
would directly clash with the tert-butyl group of L9,
regardless of the orientation of cinnamyl olefin from one side
to another (i.e., TS C T TS D). As a result, only one (TS
B) out of the four possible transition states is favored,
affording the enantioenriched product.
It is noteworthy that the oxidative cascade cyclization of
all substrates essentially yielded only one diastereomer. A
comparison of the cyclizations of 1a and 1k revealed the
stereospecific nature of the enantioselective cascade cycliza-
tions, in which the olefin geometry of the substrate com-
pletely controls the relative stereochemistry of the product.
In addition, the stereochemical outcomes supported the syn-
amidopalladation as the only operating pathway in the
reaction mechanism.18
The absolute stereochemistry of 2f can be explained by
proposing a transition-state model as shown in Figure 1.
Owing to the observed high enantioselectivities, the acrylim-
ide nitrogen (substrate) bound to the Pd center should occupy
(8) (a) Tsujihara, T.; Takenaka, K.; Onitsuka, K.; Hatanaka, M.; Sasai,
H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 3452. (b) Zhang, Y.; Sigman, M. S. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 3076. (c) Tietze, L. F.; Sommer, K. M.; Zinngrebe,
J.; Stecker, F. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 257. (d) Arai, M. A.;
Kuraishi, M.; Arai, T.; Sasai, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 2907. (e)
Uozumi, Y.; Kato, K.; Hayashi, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 5063.
(9) Yip, K.-T.; Zhu, N.-Y.; Yang, D. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 1911.
(10) (a) Nishimura, T.; Uemura, S. Synlett 2004, 201. (b) Stahl, S. S.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 3400.
(11) (a) Shibasaki, M.; Vogl, E. M.; Ohshima, T. AdV. Synth. Catal.
2004, 346, 1533. (b) Dounay, A. B.; Overman, L. E. Chem. ReV. 2003,
103, 2945.
In summary, a novel chiral tBu-QUOX (L9)/Pd(II) system
has been developed for enantioselective oxidative cascade
cyclizations. This catalyst system has the advantages of being
air stable, structurally tunable, and highly stereoselective for
a variety of disubstituted olefinic substrates. A transition-
state model has also been proposed to account for the
excellent stereocontrol, which provides the basis for design-
ing new asymmetric oxidative systems.
(12) (a) Tietze, L. F.; Ila, H.; Bell, H. P. Chem. ReV. 2004, 104, 3453.
(b) Liu, G.; Stahl, S. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 6328. (c) Trend,
R. M.; Ramtohul, Y. K.; Stoltz, B. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 17778.
(13) McManus, H. A.; Guiry, P. J. Chem. ReV. 2004, 104, 4151.
(14) For recent approaches to enantioenriched indolines, see: (a)
Barluenga, J.; Tudela, E.; Ballesteros, A.; Toma´s, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2009, 131, 2096. (b) Hyde, A. M.; Buchwald, S. L. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2008, 47, 177. (c) Trost, B. M.; Quancard, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128,
6314. (d) Arp, F. O.; Fu, G. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 14264. (e)
Sanz Gil, G.; Groth, U. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 6789.
(15) (a) Desimoni, G.; Faita, G.; Jorgensen, K. A. Chem. ReV. 2006,
106, 3561. (b) Johnson, J. S.; Evans, D. A. Acc. Chem. Res. 2000, 33, 325.
(16) Desimoni, G.; Faita, G.; Quadrelli, P. Chem. ReV. 2003, 103, 3119.
(17) Chelucci, G.; Medici, S.; Saba, A. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1999,
10, 543.
Acknowledgment. We thank the University of Hong Kong
and the Hong Kong Research Grants Council (HKU 705807P)
for financial support of this research.
(18) For examples of the syn-aminopalladation pathway, see: (a) Muniz,
K.; Hovelmann, C. H.; Streuff., J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 763. (b)
Desai, L. V.; Sanford, M. S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 5737. (c)
Liu, G.; Stahl, S. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 7179. (d) Nakhla, J. S.;
Kampf, J. W.; Wolfe, J. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 2893. (e) Ney,
J. E.; Wolfe, J. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 8644. (f) Brice, J. L.;
Harang, J. E.; Timokhin, V. I.; Anastasi, N. R.; Stahl, S. S. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2005, 127, 2868. (g) Ney, J. E.; Wolfe, J. P. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2004, 43, 3605.
Supporting Information Available: Preparation and
characterization of 1-2 and L9; HPLC analysis of chiral
products 2; and X-ray crystallographic data of product (-)-
2f and complex Pd(L9)Cl2. This material is available free
OL902348T
5628
Org. Lett., Vol. 11, No. 24, 2009