pubs.acs.org/joc
naturally occurring amino acids,4-8 due to both their low
Proline-β3-Amino-Ester Dipeptides as Efficient
Catalysts for Enantioselective Direct Aldol Reaction
in Aqueous Medium
cost and availability in highly enantiopure form.
Recently, Singh’s group have reported,9 along the line of
former reports10 by Wu et al., some new L-proline amides
having an extra chiral center at the R position of the amide
nitrogen atom and a polar, bulky group at the β position.
They are highly efficient organocatalysts carrying out dia-
stereo- and enantioselective direct aldol reactions in both
organic and (much better) aqueous medium.
Mauro De Nisco,*,§ Silvana Pedatella,§ Hidayat Ullah,†
†
§
‡
€
€
€
Javid H. Zaidi, Daniele Naviglio, Ozgur Ozdamar, and
Romualdo Caputo§
§Dipartimento di Chimica Organica e Biochimica,
Universitaꢀ di Napoli Federico II, Via Cintia, 4 Napoli 80126,
Italy, †Department of Chemistry, Quaid-i-Azam University,
Such new molecules aroused our attention for their amino
moieties that recall C-2 substituted β3-amino acids, whose
preparation we had reported rather recently11 as a part of our
current interest in the chemistry of β3-L-amino acids. As
a matter of fact, the above-mentioned proline amides can
be regarded as dipeptides of L-proline and C-2 substituted
β3-amino acids, obviously lacking the C-terminal carboxyl
group (whose usefulness, however, will be illustrated fur-
ther on).
‡
Islamabad 45320, Pakistan, and Ondokuz Mayis
€ € €
Universitesi, Fen Edebiyat Faku€ltesi, Kimya Bolumu,
Samsun 55200, Turkey
Received October 5, 2009
In this view, we wanted to investigate the behavior of some
real dipeptides coming from coupling of L-proline with
miscellaneous β3-L-amino acids as catalysts for enatioselec-
tive direct aldol reactions. The dipeptides tested were com-
pounds 1a-f,12 containing simple C-2 unsubstituted β3-
L-amino acids13 and, in addition, compounds 1g and 1h,12
carrying at C-2 a polar (NH2) group11b and a bulky polar14,15
(NHTs) group,11b respectively (Figure 1).
The aldol addition of cyclohexanone and 4-nitrobenzal-
dehyde (Figure 2) was chosen as the test reaction for the
catalytic activity since, from the current literature,9 it ap-
pears to lead to the poorest results in terms of both diastereo-
meric ratios and enantiomeric excesses.
The reactions were carried out in three different, com-
monly used mediums, namely water, brine,3a,16 and THF,
and afforded quite interesting results that are shown in
Tables 1-3.
Dipeptides obtained from L-proline and β3-L-amino acids
are reported to catalyze enantioselective direct aldol
reaction in aqueous medium, leading to significant anti:
syn diastereomeric ratios and enantiomeric excesses. The
simple introduction of a polar substituent at the C-2
position of the β3-L-amino acid was also found to enhance
appreciably both diastereo- and enantioselectivity of the
catalyst.
(4) (a) Xu, L.-W.; Lu, Y. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2008, 6, 2047–2053.
(b) Peng, F.-H.; Shao, Z.-H. J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 2008, 285, 1–13.
ꢂ
(5) Cordova, A.; Zou, W.; Ibrahem, I.; Reyes, E.; Engqvist, M.; Liao,
W.-W. Chem. Commun. 2005, 3586–3588.
(6) Jiang, Z.; Liang, Z.; Wu, X.; Lu, Y. Chem. Commun. 2006, 2801–2803.
(7) Amedjkouh, M. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2007, 18, 390–395.
(8) Peng, Y.-Y.; Wang, Q.; He, J.-Q.; Cheng, J.-P. Chin. J. Chem. 2008,
26, 1454–1460.
(9) (a) Raj, M.; Singh, V. K. J. Org. Chem. 2009, 74, 4289–4297.
(b) Gandhi, S.; Singh, V. K. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 9411–9416. (c) Maya,
V.; Raj, M.; Singh, V. K. Org. Lett. 2007, 13, 2593–2595.
(10) (a) Tang, Z.; Yang, Z.-H.; Chen, X.-H.; Cun, L.-F.; Mi, A.-Q.; Jiang,
Y.-Z.; Gong, L.-Z. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 9285–9289. (b) Tang, Z.;
Cui, X.; Gong, L. Z.; Mi, A.-Q.; Jiang, Y.-Z.; Wu, Y.-D. Proc. Natl. Acad.
Sci. U.S.A. 2004, 101, 5755–5760. (c) Tang, Z.; Jang, F.; Yu, L. T.; Cui, X.;
Gong, L.-Z.; Mi, A.-Q.; Jiang, Y.-Z.; Wu, Y.-D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125,
5262–5263.
(11) (a) Capone, S.; Pedatella, S.; Guaragna, A.; De Nisco, M.; Palumbo,
G. Tetrahedron 2007, 63, 12202–12206. (b) Capone, S.; Guaragna, A.;
Palumbo, G.; Pedatella, S. Tetrahedron 2005, 61, 6575–6579. (c) Caputo,
R.; Cecere, G.; Guaragna, A.; Palumbo, G.; Pedatella, S. Eur. J. Org. Chem.
2002, 3050–3054.
(12) Characterization data for all new compounds (including the inter-
mediates of their preparations) are reported in the Supporting Information.
(13) Caputo, R.; Cassano, E.; Longobardo, L.; Palumbo, G. Tetrahedron
1995, 51, 12337–12350.
During the past decade organocatalysis, which indeed has
been known for more than a century, has emerged as one of
the hot topics in organic chemistry.1-3 In this contest a great
deal of attention has been paid to the catalytic power of
(1) For an overview see: (a) Enantioselective Organocatalysis; Dalko, P. I.,
Ed.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2007. (b) Asymmetric Organocatalysis:
From Biomimetic Concepts to Applications in Asymmetric Synthesis;
€
Berkessel, A., Groger, H., Eds.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2005.
(2) Special issues on organocatalysis: (a) Chem. Rev. 2007, 107, 5413-
5883. (b) Tetrahedron 2006, 62, 243-502. (c) Acc. Chem. Res. 2004, 37,
631-847. (d) Adv. Synth. Catal. 2004, 346, 1007-1249.
(3) For more on organocatalysis see: (a) Gruttadauria, M.; Giacalone,
F.; Noto, R. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2009, 351, 33–57. (b) Dondoni, A.; Massi, A.
Angew. Chem. 2008, 120, 4716–4739. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47,
4638-4660. (c) Gruttadauria, M.; Giacalone, F.; Noto, R. Chem. Soc. Rev.
ꢁ
2008, 37, 1666–1688. (d) Longbottom, D. A.; Franckevicius, V.; Kumarn, S.;
Oelke, A. J.; Wascholowski, V.; Ley, S. V. Aldrichim. Acta 2008, 41, 3–11.
(e) Vicario, J. L.; Bada, D.; Carrillo, L. Synthesis 2007, 2065–2092. (f) Gaunt,
M. J.; Johansson, C. C. C.; McNally, A.; Vo, N. T. Drug Discovery Today
2007, 12, 8–27. (g) List, B. Chem. Commun. 2006, 819–824. (h) List, B.; Yang,
(14) Leo, A. B. J. Pharm. Sci. 2000, 89, 1567–1578.
ꢂ
J. W. Science 2006, 313, 1584–1586. (i) Guillena, G.; Ramon, D. J. Tetra-
(15) Jeffrey, G. A. In An Introducdtion to Hydrogen Bonding; Truhlar,
D. G., Ed.; Oxford University Press: New York, 1997.
(16) Gryko, D.; Saletra, W. J. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2007, 5, 2148–2153.
hedron: Asymmetry 2006, 17, 1465–1492. (j) Dalko, P. I.; Moisan, L. Angew.
Chem. 2004, 116, 5248–5286. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 5138-5175.
9562 J. Org. Chem. 2009, 74, 9562–9565
Published on Web 11/25/2009
DOI: 10.1021/jo902106r
r
2009 American Chemical Society