F.-H. Porꢀe, V. Gandon et al.
À
2.49 (s, 3H; CH3), 2.47 ppm (s, 3H; CH3); 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3):
d=162.4 (C, C=O), 158.6 (C, PMB), 137.8 (C, C1), 136.5 (C, C4a), 135.3
(C, C10), 134.4 (CH, C9), 133.8 (C, C10a), 129.0 (C, C6a), 128.4 (C, PMB),
127.9 (2CH, PMB), 127.9 (CH, C3), 127.1 (CH, C8), 125.7 (CH, C7), 124.9
(CH, C4), 119.9 (C, C10b), 114.1 (2CH, PMB), 112.0 (CH, C2), 55.3 (CH3,
OCH3), 46.1 (CH2, PMB), 22.2 (CH3, C1), 21.8 ppm (CH3, C10); MS
(ESI): m/z calcd: 366 [M+Na]+; HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd for
C23H21NNaO2: 366.1470 [M+Na]+; found: 366.1474.
formation of aryl aryl bonds from aryl halides by means of
PdIV intermediates should also be considered in other relat-
ed Pd-catalyzed processes.
Experimental Section
1H NMR spectroscopy and mass spectrometry (ESI-MS) monitoring: In
an NMR spectroscopy tube, 1 f (10 mg, 0,028 mmol, 1 equiv) and [Pd-
AHCTUNGTRENN(GNU PPh3)2Cl2] (1.2 or 0.2 equiv) were successively introduced. The tube was
General procedure for the domino reaction: K2CO3 (3 equiv) and [Pd-
ACHTUNGTRENNUNG(PPh3)2Cl2] (0.05 equiv) were successively added to a solution of the
amide (1 equiv) in anhydrous DMF or 1,4-dioxane (20 mL). The resulting
suspension was purged three times with argon then heated at reflux in a
preheated oil bath at 1558C for 3 h (DMF) or at 1058C for 24 h (1,4-di-
oxane). The reaction mixture was then cooled to RT, and the solvent was
removed in vacuo. H2O was added to the residue and extracted with
CH2Cl2 (3 times). The combined organic extracts were washed with
brine, dried over MgSO4, filtered, and evaporated. The residue was puri-
fied by column chromatography on silica gel to afford the corresponding
phenanthridinone.
sealed by an appropriate septum and purged with argon (3 times). Then
[D7]DMF or [D8]1,4-dioxane (0.7 mL) was added, and the resulting solu-
tion was degassed. The tube was introduced into the spectrometer and
the probe was warmed at 1208C ([D7]DMF) or 908C ([D8]1,4-dioxane).
Then a first FID acquisition was carried out. The solution was cooled to
RT, and K2CO3 (12 mg, 3 equiv) was introduced. The resulting mixture
was homogenized and an aliquot was analyzed by ESI-MS (t=0). The
tube was then placed into the NMR spectrometer and heated at 120 or
908C. FID acquisitions were achieved every 30 min. When a significant
modification was observed by 1H NMR spectroscopy, an aliquot of the
reaction mixture was analyzed by ESI-MS. The 1H NMR spectroscopic
monitoring is reported in Tables 1 and 2 for [D7]DMF and [D8]1,4-diox-
ane, respectively, as the percentage composition of amide 1 f and tricycles
2 f or 3 f based on the methylenedioxy moieties and PMB CH2-group sig-
nals. ESI mass spectra were performed in both positive and negative
modes at 30 and 60 V from the aliquot taken beforehand and diluted in
acetonitrile.
2-Bromo-3-methyl-para-methoxybenzylamide (10): According to the gen-
eral procedure, 10 (451 mg, 1.35 mmol, 58% yield) was obtained from 2-
bromo-3-methylbenzoic acid (500 mg, 2.33 mmol) as
a white solid.
1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): d=7.31 (d, J=8.6 Hz, 2H; PMB), 7.28–
7.18 (m, 3H; H4, H5 and H6), 6.88 (d, J=8.6 Hz, 2H; PMB), 6.17 (brs,
1H; NH), 4.56 (d, J=5.6 Hz, 2H; CH2, PMB), 3.81 (s, 3H; 2OCH3),
3.43 ppm (s, 3H; CH3); 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): d=168.4 (C, C=O),
159.1 (C, PMB), 139.3 (C, C3), 139.0 (C, C1), 131.8 (CH, C4), 129.8 (C,
PMB), 129.4 (2CH, PMB), 127.3 (CH, C5), 126.3 (CH, C6), 121.7 (C, C2),
114.1 (2CH, PMB), 56.3 (CH3, OCH3, PMB), 43.6 (CH2, PMB), 23.6 ppm
(CH3); MS (ESI): m/z calcd: 356 [M+Na]+; found: 358; HRMS (ESI):
m/z calcd for C16H16BrNNaO2: 356.0262 [M+Na]+; found: 356.0271.
5-Methylphenanthridin-6(5H)-one-1-methylcarboxamide (3i): According
to the general procedure, 3i (16 mg, 0.06 mmol, 76% yield) was obtained
Acknowledgements
from 1i (59 mg, 0.19 mmol) as
a
white solid. 1H NMR (300 MHz,
CDCl3): d=8.19–8.17 (m, 2H; H7 and H4), 8.07 (d, J=8.1 Hz, 1H; H10),
7.76 (td, J=7.5 and 1.2 Hz, 1H; H9), 7.57 (td, J=7.5, 1.2 Hz, 1H; H8),
We are deeply grateful to Dr. A. Jutand (Ecole Normale Supꢀrieure, Dꢀ-
partement de Chimie UMR CNRS-ENS-UPMC 8640) for her constant
support and her helpful discussions. Calculations were performed at
CRIHAN, plan interrꢀgional du bassin parisien (project 2006-013), and
at the CRI of UPS.
3
5
7.48 (t, J=7.3 Hz, 2H; H2 and H ), 6.62 (s, 1H; NH), 3.72 (s, 3H; N
À
CH3), 3.07 ppm (d, J=4.8 Hz, 3H; CH3); 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3):
d=170.7 (C, C1C=O), 162.8 (C, C6 =O), 133.1 (C), 132.6 (CH, C9), 130.3
(CH, C2), 129.5 (C), 128.3 (CH, C7), 128.3 (CH, C8), 127.0 (C), 124.9 (C),
124.6 (CH, C4), 122.3 (CH, C3), 121.7 (CH, C10), 121.0 (C), 36.0 (CH3,
5
À
À
N
CH3), 27.1 ppm (CH3, N CH3); IR (NaCl, film): n˜ =3292, 3072, 1650,
[1] a) J. S. Carey, D. Laffan, C. Thomson, M. T. Williams, Org. Biomol.
Report, the most widespread heterocycles in pharmaceutically
active compounds are pyridine (out of 15000 structures), imidazole
(out of 11000), indole (out of 6700), and pyrimidine (out of 4500);
see: V. Bonnet, F. Mongin, F. Trꢀcourt, G. Breton, F. Marsais, P.
F. Marsais, V. Snieckus, J. Epsztajn, Adv. Heterocycl. Chem. 1991,
52, 187–304; d) R. W. Friesen, C. Brideau, C. C. Chan, S. Charleson,
D. DeschÞnes, D. Dubꢀ, D. Ethier, R. Fortin, J. Y. Gauthier, Y.
Girard, R. Gordon, G. M. Greig, D. Riendeau, C. Savoie, Z. Wang,
Rev. Drug Discovery 2003, 2, 769–770; f) G. Chelucci, G. Orrꢄ,
1637, 1592, 1550, 1467, 1431, 1408, 1316, 1259, 1173, 1122, 1048, 970, 765,
729, 666 cmÀ1; UV/Vis (MeOH): lmax (loge)=218 (4.7), 228 (4.5), 263 nm
(3.2); MS (ESI): m/z calcd: 291 [M+Na]+; HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd for
C16H14N2NaO2: 289.0953 [M+Na]+; found: 289.0962.
Reaction in the presence of PivOH: K2CO3 (42 mg, 0.306 mmol, 3 equiv),
[PdACHTUNGTRENNUNG(PPh3)2Cl2] (3.6 mg, 5.1 mmol, 0.05 equiv), and pivalic acid (3 mg,
0.031 mmol, 0.3 equiv) were successively added to a solution of amide 1 f
(36 mg, 0.102 mmol, 1 equiv) in 1,4-dioxane (20 mL). The resulting sus-
pension was purged three times under argon then heated to reflux at
1058C for 24 h. The reaction mixture was cooled to RT, and 1,4-dioxane
was removed in vacuo. After addition of H2O, the solution was extracted
with CH2Cl2 (3 times). The combined organic extracts were washed with
brine, dried over MgSO4, filtered, and concentrated. The residue was pu-
rified by column chromatography on silica gel (20–45 mm, cyclohexane/
EtOAc 7:3 to 1:1) to afford the corresponding tricycles 2 f (4.5 mg,
0.011 mmol, 22%) and 3 f (3.3 mg, 0.006 mmol, 11.5%).
[2] a) F. Diederich, P. J. Stang, Metal-Catalyzed Cross-Coupling Re-
AHCTUNGTREGaNNUN ctions, Wiley-VCH, New York, 1998; b) J. Hassan, M. Sꢀvignon, C.
5-para-Methoxybenzyl-2,10-dimethylphenanthridin-6(5H)-one (11): Re-
action in DMF: According to the general procedure, 11 (47 mg,
0.137 mmol, 92% yield) was obtained from 10 (100 mg, 0.299 mmol) as a
colorless oil. Reaction in 1,4-dioxane: According to the general proce-
dure, 11 (31 mg, 0.090 mmol, 60% yield) was obtained from 10 (100 mg,
0.299 mmol) as a colorless oil. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): d=8.41 (d,
J=7.5 and 1.1 Hz, 1H; H7), 7.60 (td, J=7.5 and 1.1 Hz, 1H; H8), 7.54 (t,
J=7.5 Hz, 1H; H9), 7.28 (t, J=6.8 Hz, 1H; H3), 7.23 (d, J=8.7 Hz, 2H;
PMB), 7.19–7.11 (m, 2H; H4 and H2), 5.66 (d, J=15.1 Hz, 1H; CH2,
PMB), 5.33 (d, J=15.1 Hz, 1H; CH2, PMB), 3.77 (s, 3H; OCH3, PMB),
À
[3] The advantages of direct carbon hydrogen bond functionalization
were recognized some time ago. For a recent review on the topic of
À
À
C H activation, see: Topics in Current Chemistry, Vol. 292, C H Ac-
tivation (Eds.: J.-Q. Yu, Z. Shi), Springer, Berlin, 2010.
Gericke, Domino Reactions in Organic Synthesis, Wiley-VCH, Wein-
heim, 2006.
12818
ꢂ 2011 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Chem. Eur. J. 2011, 17, 12809 – 12819