Scheme 1
.
Plan for Synthesis of the Polar Subunit of
Scheme 2. Synthesis of Allylic Alcohols 3
(+)-Scyphostatin (1)
The synthesis commenced with oxidative dearomatization
of the phenol 5 using phenyliodine diacetate (PIDA) to
provide the dienone 6 in 52% yield (Scheme 2). Alterna-
tively, singlet oxygen oxidation of 5 under basic conditions
followed by reduction with DMS also gave the dienone 6 in
a similar yield (45%).8
Here we report a dynamic kinetic resolution (DKR) that
is coupled to a reversible (and rare4) vinylogous Payne
rearrangement (cf. graphical abstract above). The DKR was
achieved using a lipase (Amano PS) as the chiral discrimina-
tor to generate a product, 9a, that contains many of the
constitutional and configurational features of (+)-scyphos-
tatin (1).5
Epoxidation of the dienone 6 with H2O2/NaOH produced
the diepoxide 4 as a single diastereomer,7 and treatment with
hydrazine to effect Wharton rearrangement gave a nearly
1:1 ratio of the allylic alcohols 3a and 3b (30-40% over
two steps). It is noteworthy that sequential application of a
1
Our analysis (Scheme 1) of the scyphostatin core revealed
that it might be formed from a protected amino alcohol such
as the Troc-acetonide 2 (Troc ) Cl3CCH2OCO). We hoped
to make the epoxycyclohexenone 2 via an oxidative DKR
of the pseudoenantiomers 3a and 3b, under conditions where
the stereoisomers would equilibrate via a vinylogous Payne
rearrangement (see curly arrows, Scheme 1). If successful,
such a DKR would be significant because it would establish
three stereocenters in one step. The mixture of allylic alcohols
3 could arise from the Wharton rearrangement of the
diepoxide 4, another example of a rarely seen transforma-
tion.6 We envisioned that the syn-diepoxide 4 could be made
by oxidative dearomatization of the L-tyrosine derivative 5
followed by bis-epoxidation cis to the tertiary hydroxyl
group.7
set of such elementary reagents as O2, H2O2/NaOH, and
NH2NH2 affords a product having the molecular complexity
of 3a/b from a simple phenolic precursor.
The allylic alcohol diastereomers 3a and 3b were separated
by HPLC (SiO2). The equilibration of each of these isolated
diastereomers back to a mixture of 3a and 3b would
implicate a vinylogous Payne rearrangement. This equilibra-
tion occurred slowly upon heating (80 °C) in deuterated
solvents [CDCl3 and d6-acetone (Scheme 3, top)]. A ca. 1:1
ratio of 3a and 3b was reestablished after heating for 3 days
(half-life ca. 1 day).
Because this equilibration occurred under such mild (and
essentially neutral) conditions, we wondered if the tertiary
alcohol could be acting as an intramolecular H-bond donor
to the epoxide in 3,9 thus lowering the activation barrier of
this vinylogous Payne rearrangement. Intramolecular proton-
shuttling through a locally symmetrical transition state
geometry like 7 (Scheme 3, bottom) was an attractive
conceptualization of the process.10 This mechanistic thinking
was probed by comparing the rate of rearrangement of 3a
versus its deuterated analogue. Thus, parallel experiments
(4) The only example we know of this type of rearrangement (i to ii)
occurs under silylative conditions: Myers, A. G.; Siegel, D. R.; Buzard,
D. J.; Charest, M. G. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 2923–2926.
(5) (a) Tanaka, M.; Nara, F.; Suzuki-Konagai, K.; Hosoya, T.; Ogita,
T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 7871–7872. (b) Nara, F.; Tanaka, M.;
Hosoya, T.; Suzuki-Konagai, K.; Ogita, T. J. Antibiot. 1999, 52, 525–530.
(c) Nara, F.; Tanaka, M.; Masuda-Inoue, S.; Yamasato, Y.; Doi-Yoshioka,
H.; Suzuki-Konagai, K.; Kumakura, S.; Ogita, T. J. Antibiot. 1999, 52, 531–
535.
(8) Saito, I.; Chujo, Y.; Shimazu, H.; Yamane, M.; Matsuura, T.;
Cahnmann, H. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1975, 97, 5272–5277.
(9) That the degree of hydrogen bonding is substantial in each of 3a
and 3b is supported by the NMR observation of coupling of both of their
hydroxyl protons to, for the secondary hydroxyl, the vicinal/allylic proton
at C3R/S (3J ) ∼12 Hz) and, for the tertiary hydroxyl, long range coupling
(4J ) ∼1.5 Hz) to a methylene proton in the sidechain.
(6) Wharton on a diepoxyketone: (a) Ichihara, A.; Oda, K.; Kobayashi,
M.; Sakamura, S. Tetrahedron 1980, 36, 183–188. (b) Aoyagi, Y.;
Hitotsuyanagi, Y.; Hasuda, T.; Fukaya, H.; Takeya, K.; Aiyama, R.;
Matsuzaki, T.; Hashimoto, S. Biorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2006, 16, 1947–
1949.
(10) For other examples of internal hydrogen-bond catalysis, see: (a)
Choy, W.; Reed, L. A., III; Masamune, S. J. Org. Chem. 1983, 48, 1137–
1139. (b) Cox, C. D.; Siu, T.; Danishefsky, S. J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2003, 42, 5625–5629. (c) Stark, L. M.; Pekari, K.; Sorensen, E. J. Proc.
Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2004, 101, 12064–12066.
(7) McKillop, A.; Taylor, R. J. K.; Watson, R. J.; Lewis, N. Chem.
Commun. 1992, 1589–1591.
Org. Lett., Vol. 12, No. 1, 2010
53