reactions.6 However, although hydrogenation is an efficient
strategy, it has limitations in terms of starting materials
because it requires the corresponding substituted pyrazines
to be available. The catalyst required can also be costly, and
the potential presence of catalyst traces in the product may
complicate its use in late stages of pharmaceutical synthesis.
Furthermore, asymmetric hydrogenation has only been
reported for pyrazine carboxylic acid derivates, with an ee
up to 78%.7 The synthesis of piperazines via cycloconden-
sation reactions often requires multistep synthesis, and the
structural diversity is limited depending on the access of
commercially available starting materials. In 2009, Guercio
et al. reported on an excellent scalable route to a chirally
pure arylpiperazine based on a dynamic kinetic resolution.
This key fragment, used in the synthesis of the NK1
antagonist GW597599, was synthesized after significant
optimization in an overall yield of 60% over nine steps.8
Herein, we report a conceptually new synthesis of sub-
stituted piperazines via the reaction between Grignard
reagents and activated pyrazines (i.e., pyrazine N-oxides (1))
followed by a reduction. After N-Boc protection, the corre-
sponding N,N-diprotected substituted piperazines formed are
easy to handle and can be orthogonally deprotected giving
the opportunity of synthetic modifications on either nitrogen.
This synthetic sequence is performed in one pot with only a
purification of the final product. Finally we show that in the
presence of (-)-sparteine this reaction offers an enantiose-
lective synthesis to substituted piperazines.
Table 1. One-Pot Synthesis of Substituted Piperazinesc
The reaction was explored in studies using pyrazine
N-oxide (1) and phenylmagnesium chloride, which indicated
that addition of pyrazine N-oxide to Grignard reagents at
-78 °C in dichloromethane followed by reduction with
NaBH4 and protection with di-tert-butyl dicarbonate anhy-
dride gave the best results. The N-Boc protected N-hydroxyl
piperazine 2a was isolated in an excellent 91% yield,
considering that it is a three-step, one-pot synthesis. Several
Grignard reagents were reacted with pyrazine N-oxide (1)
to give substituted piperazines (2) in good to high yields
(Table 1).
a Yields of isolated products. b Also performed in gram-scale resulting
in piperazine 2a in a isolated yield of 76%. c Reaction conditions: N-oxide
(1 equiv) in CH2Cl2, Grignard reagent (2.5 equiv), NaBH4 (1.1 equiv) in 2
mL of MeOH, Boc2O (3.0 equiv).
The addition of 4-biphenylmagnesium chloride gave 2h
in 67% yield, whereas the sterically more demanding
2-biphenylmagnesium chloride yielded the corresponding
piperazine 2i in 33% yield (entries 8 and 9, Table 1). Notably,
the steric exerted by an ortho-methyl is well tolerated, and
2e was isolated in 72% yield (entry 5, Table 1). A TMS
substituent was also compatible with the method, and the
4-((TMS)ethynyl)phenyl Grignard reagent yielded piperazine
2g in 53% yield (entry 7, Table 1). The heteroaromatic
thienyl and indole Grignard reagents resulted in 52% and
55% isolated yields, respectively (entries 11 and 12). Last
year (2008), we reported the ortho-metalation of pyridine
N-oxides using alkylmagnesium halides.9 However, when
analogously reacting pyrazine N-oxide with n-butylmagne-
sium chloride we did not observe the expected formation of
an ortho-metalated derivative after trapping experiments.
Instead, the corresponding n-butyl-substituted piperazine 2m
was isolated after reduction and N-Boc protection in 40%
yield (Table 1, entry 13). Finally, the reactivity of the
propenyl Grignard reagent was studied, yielding piperazine
2n in 54% isolated yield over three steps (entry 14, Table
1).
The incorporation of piperazine fragments in pharmaceu-
ticals often requires selective synthetic modifications at either
nitrogen; therefore an orthogonal deprotection of the N-Boc
N-hydroxyl piperazine 2a was developed. Zinc dust in MeOH
and acetic acid selectively removed the N-hydroxyl group,
(5) Leclerc, J.-P.; Fagnou, K. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 7781–
7786.
(6) (a) Nordstrom, L. U.; Madsen, R. Chem. Commun. 2007, 5034–
5036. (b) Raw, S. A.; Wilfred, C. D.; Taylor, R. J. K. Chem.Commun. 2003,
2286–2287.
(7) Zhou, Y.-G. Acc. Chem. Res. 2007, 40, 1357–1366.
(8) (a) Guercio, G.; Bacchi, S.; Goodyear, M.; Carangio, A.; Tinazzi,
F.; Curti, S. Org. Process Res. DeV. 2008, 12, 1188–1194. (b) Guercio, G.;
Manzo, A. M.; Goodyear, M.; Bacchi, S.; Curti, S.; Provera, S. Org. Process
Res. DeV. 2009, 13, 489–493.
(9) Andersson, H.; Gustafsson, M.; Olsson, R.; Almqvist, F. Tetrahedron
Lett. 2008, 49, 6901–6903.
Org. Lett., Vol. 12, No. 2, 2010
285