Angewandte
Chemie
is unstable, which we believe is due to the lack of
additional substitutions on the C2 and C6 positions of
anthracene. In addition, FAF shows two sequential
reduction peaks at Eꢁ1;red = ꢂ1.92 V and Eꢁ2;red = ꢂ2.29 V
vs. SCE, whereas anthracene exhibits only one higher
reduction peak at Eꢁ1;red = ꢂ2.09 V. Although the electro-
chemical behavior of FAF is close to that of DPA, the
second reduction of FAF is clearly seen while that of DPA
could not be detected within the potential window of the
solvent used in this experiment.
FDF, with C2, C6, C9, and C10 aryl-blocked anthra-
cene core, reversibly oxidizes to give its first oxidation at
Eꢁ1;ox = 1.05 V (for DPA, E1ꢁ;ox = 1.15 V)[8] and the second
reversible oxidation peak at Eꢁ2;ox = 1.48 V (compared to
DPA with an irreversible wave, even at higher scan rates,
E
p2,ox = 1.58 V)(Figure 2b)). The observed peak separa-
tion for the reversible waves was ca. 80 mV, larger than
expected peak splitting for ideal nernstian behavior,
where a one-electron redox wave is expected to have a
peak separation of ca. 59 mV. However, the internal
standard, ferrocene, which is known to show nernstian
behavior showed a similar peak separation under the
same conditions. Thus, the observed peak separation can
be attributed to ohmic drop ( ꢀ 1200 ohm) that is often
observed with aprotic solvents. Scan rate studies (Sup-
porting Information, Figure S1, S2) showed that the
anodic and cathodic peak currents (ipa, ipc) of the first
oxidation wave were proportional to the square root of
scan rate (n1/2) while the corresponding peak potentials
(Epa, Epc) were independent of n. Additionally, the peak
current ratio (ipa/ipc) was approximately unity down to a
scan rate of 100 mVsꢂ1, indicating the absence of a
subsequent chemical reaction upon oxidation. FDF shows
two reversible reduction peaks with each reduction peak
height and separation ( ꢀ 80 mV) equal to those of the
oxidation waves, indicating that each reduction is a one-
electron transfer process. The potentials of the reduction
waves were E1ꢁ;red = ꢂ1.78 V and E2ꢁ;red = ꢂ2.27 V, while for
DPA, only one reduction at Eꢁ1;red = ꢂ2.06 V was detected.
The lower first oxidation potential (by 100 mV) and reduction
potential (by 280 mV) and the reversibility of the second
oxidation and reduction processes indicate that radical ions
and doubly charged moieties are more stable in FDF than in
DPA. This can be attributed to the enhanced p-conjugation,
rendering the delocalization of charges throughout the parent
DPA core and fluorene substitutions, although the DFT
calculation (B3LYP/STO-3G) on the energy-optimized
molecular geometry of FDF (Figure S3) reveals the dihedral
angles between the DPA core and two C9-biphenyl substi-
tuted fluorene rings are 29.48 and 31.58, respectively. Thus, the
introduction of fluorene peripherals on C2 and C6 of
anthracene not only stabilizes the radical ions, but also
blocks the active positions subject to decomposition, giving
rise to extra stabilization on the highly charged species
(dication and dianion).
Figure 2. Cyclic voltammograms of a) FAF and anthracene, b) FDF and
DPA, and c) FPF and pyrene. Conditions: 1 mm compound, 0.1m Bu4NPF6
as supporting electrolyte in benzene/MeCN (1:1), scan rate 100 mVsꢂ1
;
working electrode: Pt disk (1 mm diameter), counter electrode: Pt wire,
reference electrode: Ag wire (calibrated vs Fc/Fc+). Normalized absorption
(solid line) and emission spectra (dotted line, excited at absorption
maxima) of d) FAF and anthracene, e) FDF and DPA, and f) FPF and pyrene
in MeCN/benzene (1:1).
Table 1: Electrochemical data of FAF, FDF, and FPF as compared to their
parent counterparts.[a]
Oxid. [Vꢁ]
E1;ox
Red. [Vꢁ]
Cmpd.
E1ꢁ;ox
E1ꢁ;red
E2;red
D [cm2 sꢂ1
]
FAF
anthracene
FDF
DPA
FPF
1.13
1.24(Ep)
1.05
1.15
1.10
1.57(Ep)
–
1.48
1.58(Ep)
1.43
–
ꢂ1.92
ꢂ2.09
ꢂ1.87
ꢂ2.06
ꢂ2.00
ꢂ2.19
ꢂ2.29
9.5ꢀ10ꢂ6
–
ꢂ2.27
9.0ꢀ10ꢂ6
9.0ꢀ10ꢂ6
–
ꢂ2.30
pyrene
1.16
–
[a] All potentials are versus SCE,* where Eo(Fc/Fc+)=0.424 V vs. SCE. D:
diffusion coefficient.
positive potential than the parent anthracene by 130 mV
(anthracene, Ep = 1.24 V; Ep is peak potential).[6] The second
oxidation of FAF at Ep2,ox = 1.57 V is irreversible even with a
scan rate of 2000 mVsꢂ1. As shown in Figure 2a, the oxidation
of anthracene is totally irreversible. Aikens et al. suggested
that the irreversible oxidation of anthracene can be attributed
to the nucleophilic attack by solvent on the meso positions of
anthracene leading to the decomposition of the radical
cations.[7] Thus, C9 and C10 aryl-substituted anthracenes,
such as DPA and FAF, can efficiently suppress the decom-
position process, and allow reversible oxidations. The irre-
versible second oxidation of FAF indicates the dication FAF2+
As compared to pyrene (Figure 2c), FPF shows two
oxidation waves E1ꢁ;ox = 1.10, E2ꢁ;ox = 1.43 V vs. SCE. The first
oxidation is reversible at all scan rates ranging from 50 mV to
10 Vsꢂ1, while the second oxidation shows reversibility only
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 9300 –9303
ꢀ 2009 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
9301