reaction centre increased the enantiomeric excess (entries 2–4). We
attribute this effect to steric hindrance.
Ro¨der, Synthesis, 2001, 171–196; (d) B. L. Feringa, R. Naasz, R. Imbos
and L. A. Arnold, in Modern Organocopper Chemistry, ed. N. Krause,
VCH, Weinheim, Germany, 2002, pp. 224–258; (e) A. Alexakis and C.
Benhaim, Eur. J. Org. Chem., 2002, 3221–3236; (f) T. Hayashi and K.
Yamasaki, Chem. Rev., 2003, 103, 2829–2844; (g) S. Woodward, Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed., 2005, 44, 5560–5562; (h) F. Lope´z, A. J. Minnaard and
B. L. Feringa, in The Chemistry of Organomagnesium Compounds, ed.
Z. Rappoport, I. Marek, Wiley, Chichester, U. K., 2008, Part 2, Chapter
17; (i) S. R. Harutyunyan, T. den Hartog, K. Geurts, A. J. Minnaard
and B. L. Feringa, Chem. Rev., 2008, 108, 2824–2852.
3 (a) E. N. Prilezhaeva, Russ. Chem. Rev., 2000, 69, 367; (b) S. E. Kelly,
in Comprehensive Organic Synthesis, ed. B. M. Trost, I. Flemming,
Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1991, Vol. 1, pp. 792; (c) B. M. Trost, Bull.
Chem. Soc. Jpn., 1988, 61, 107; (d) N. S. Simpkins, Sulphones in Organic
Synthesis; Tetrahedron Organic Chemistry Series 10, Pergamon Press,
Oxford, U.K., 1993.
In the instance of electron donating substituents such as
the para methyl and para isopropyl substituted substrates full
conversion was not achieved after 24 h giving lower isolated yields.
Fortunately, the lower reaction rate did not negatively influence the
enantiomeric excess and excellent ee’s were obtained (entries 5 and
7). Furthermore, para trifluoromethyl-, p-bromo- and 2-naphthyl-
substituted substrates gave good yields and excellent enantiomeric
excesses (entries 6, 8 and 9).
In summary, we have developed a highly enantioselective
copper-catalyzed conjugate addition of dialkylzinc reagents to a
range of aromatic a,b-unsaturated sulfones using a monodentate
phosphoramidite ligand. This procedure provided b-substituted
2-pyridyl sulfones in moderate to good yields (46–86%) and good
to excellent enantiomeric excess (70–96%) and is complementary
to our recent publication on the addition of Grignard reagents to
aliphatic substrates.8 These enantioenriched sulfones are poten-
tially useful intermediates in the preparation of a wide variety of
functionalized chiral building blocks.
4 T. Llamas, R. G. Arraya´s and J. C. Carretero, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.,
2007, 46, 3329–3332.
5 J.-N. Desrosiers and A. B. Charette, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2007, 46,
5955–5957.
6 (a) P. Mauleo´n and J. C. Carretero, Org. Lett., 2004, 6, 3195–3198; (b) P.
Mauleo´n and J. C. Carretero, Chem. Commun., 2005, 4961–4963; (c) P.
Mauleo´n, I. Alonso, M. R. Rivero and J. C. Carretero, J. Org. Chem.,
2007, 72, 9924–9935.
7 J.-N. Desrosiers, W. S. Bechara and A. B. Charette, Org. Lett., 2008,
10, 2315–2318.
8 P. H. Bos, A. J. Minnaard and B. L. Feringa, Org. Lett., 2008, 10,
4219–4222.
Acknowledgements
9 (a) B. L. Feringa, Acc. Chem. Res., 2000, 33, 346–353; (b) A. J.
Minnaard, B. L. Feringa, L. Lefort and J. G. de Vries, Acc. Chem.
Res., 2007, 40, 1267; (c) J. G. de Vries and L. Lefort, in Handbook of
Homogenous Hydrogenation, ed. J. G. De Vries, C. J. Elsevier, Wiley-
VCH Verlag, Weinheim, Germany, 2007, pp. 1245–1278; (d) L. Lefort
and J. G. de Vries, in Phosphorus Ligands in Asymmetric Catalysis, ed.
A. Bo¨rmer, Wiley-VCH Verlag, Weinheim, Germany, 2008, pp. 1348–
1376; (e) R. B. C. Jagt, P. Y. Toullec, E. P. Schudde, J. G. de Vries, B. L.
Feringa and A. J. Minnaard, J. Comb. Chem., 2007, 9, 407.
10 (a) A. H. M. de Vries, A. Meetsma and B. L. Feringa, Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. Engl., 1996, 35, 2374; (b) B. L. Feringa, M. Pineschi, L. A.
Arnold, R. Imbos and A. H. M. de Vries, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl.,
1997, 36, 2620; (c) A. Alexakis, D. Polet, S. Rosset and S. March, J. Org.
Chem., 2004, 69, 5660; (d) T. Jerphagnon, M. G. Pizzuti, A. J. Minnaard
and B. L. Feringa, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2009, 38, 1039–1075.
11 This dependence is in contrast to that reported for the asymmetric
conjugate addition of Grignard reagents to a,b-unsaturated sulfones
where the nature of the counterion hardly had an effect on conversion
and enantioselectivity, see ref. 8.
Financial support from The Netherlands Organization for
Scientific Research (NWO-CW) is acknowledged. We thank
T. D. Tiemersma-Wegman (GC and HPLC) and A. Kiewiet
(MS) for technical assistance (Stratingh Institute for Chemistry,
University of Groningen).
Notes and references
1 (a) P. Perlmutter, Conjugate Addition Reactions in Organic Synthesis;
Tetrahedron Organic Chemistry Series 9, Pergamon Press, Oxford, U.K.,
1992; (b) B. E. Rossiter and N. M. Swingle, Chem. Rev., 1992, 92, 771–
806.
2 (a) For reviews, see: K. Tomioka and Y. Nagaoka, in Comprehensive
Asymmetric Catalysis, ed. E. N. Jacobsen, A. Pfaltz, H. Yamamoto,
Springer, New York, 1999, Vol. 3, pp. 1105–1120; (b) B. L. Feringa,
Acc. Chem. Res., 2000, 33, 346–353; (c) N. Krause and A. Hoffmann-
This journal is
The Royal Society of Chemistry 2010
Org. Biomol. Chem., 2010, 8, 47–49 | 49
©