C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
Scheme 2
R-methylene γ-lactone group from undergoing conjugate addition
with the highly reactive LiEt3BH. Simple treatment of the crude
triol with MnO2 easily reformed the R-methylene γ-lactone. The
two diastereomers originating from the epoxidation could now be
separated to provide the desired γ-lactone 11. Finally, oxidative
cleavage of the secondary TBS protecting group16 was achieved
in one step to reveal the ketone, thus completing the total
synthesis.17
This first enantioselective total synthesis of (+)-chinensiolide B
(1) was achieved in 15 steps for the longest linear sequence with
an overall yield of 6.7% starting from inexpensive and readily
available (R)-carvone. The absolute configuration of the chinensi-
olides is thus confirmed. A highly stereoselective and E/Z-selective
tandem allylboration/lactonization reaction between two highly
functionalized partners was exploited as a key step. The synthesis
also highlights several solutions to chemoselectivity issues arising
from the reactive R-methylene γ-lactone. For instance, ring-closing
metathesis formed the requisite seven-membered ring chemoselec-
tively while avoiding the reactivity of the conjugated R-methylene
unit.
Acknowledgment. This work was funded by the Natural
Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada
and the University of Alberta. T.G.E. thanks NSERC and the
Alberta Ingenuity Fund for graduate scholarships. We thank Dr.
Robert McDonald for the X-ray crystallographic analysis of 8.13
Supporting Information Available: Full experimentals and NMR
spectral reproductions for all compounds, and complete ref 3. This
Selective deprotection of the primary TBDPS group11 on 3 was
followed by a Grieco elimination12 of the primary alcohol to afford
desired triene 9, albeit with only a moderate yield of 60% for the
two steps. Careful control of the stoichiometry of both reagents
was important to minimize formation of byproduct 8 where the
cyanide anion had undergone conjugate addition to the enoate.10
Fortuitously, byproduct 8 proved to be crystalline and allowed for
X-ray crystal structure13 confirmation of the allylboration’s ste-
reoselectivity. Formation of medium rings by RCM can be
problematic when the final alkene is tri- or tetrasubstituted.14 In
spite of our apprehension, a chemoselective RCM of triene 9 using
5 mol % of Grubbs II catalyst provided the desired tricycle 10 in
high yield. Most likely, steric bulk around the lactone’s R-methylene
unit and formation of a bridgehead olefin helped suppress closure
to the possible tetrasubstituted six-membered enoate, allowing the
desired RCM pathway to proceed uncontested. The final stage of
the synthesis involves the diastereoselective epoxidation of this
newly formed alkene in 10. Nucleophilic epoxidation reagents could
not be used due to the electrophilic nature of the R-methylene
γ-lactone. Satisfactorily, treatment of 10 with mCPBA gave epoxide
2 as an unseparable 4:1 mixture of diastereomers favoring the
desired one. Regioselective opening of epoxides to give Markovni-
kov products is typically achieved through the use of nucleophilic
hydride reagents.15 However, with 2, over-reduction of the γ-lactone
occurred with LiAlH4 to give the fully saturated triol and conjugate
reduction of the R-methylene group took place preferentially to
epoxide opening with LiEt3BH. What proved ultimately successful
was a one-pot double reduction protocol whereby the γ-lactone
moiety of 2 was first reduced to the diol with DIBALH, and then
LiEt3BH was added to regio- and chemoselectively open the
epoxide. This unusual protocol allowed for protection of the
References
(1) (a) Hoffmann, H. M. R.; Rabe, J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1985, 24,
94–110. (b) Konaklieva, M. I.; Plotkin, B. J. Mini ReV. Med. Chem. 2005,
5, 73–95.
(2) Zhang, S.; Wang, J.; Xue, H.; Deng, Q.; Xing, F.; Ando, M. J. Nat. Prod.
2002, 65, 1927–1929.
(3) Zhang, S.; et al. J. Nat. Prod. 2006, 69, 1425–1428.
(4) Dai, J.; Yang, L.; Sakai, J.; Ando, M. J. Mol. Catal. B: Enzym. 2005, 33,
87–91.
(5) (a) Hall, D. G. Synlett 2007, 1644–1655. (b) Elford, T. G.; Arimura, Y.;
Yu, S. H.; Hall, D. G. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 1276–1284. (c) Kennedy,
J. W. J.; Hall, D. G. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69, 4412–4428.
(6) Oliver, S. F.; Hogenauer, K.; Simic, O.; Antonello, A.; Smith, M. D.; Ley,
S. V. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 5996–6000.
(7) Omura, K.; Swern, D. Tetrahedron 1978, 34, 1651–1660.
(8) (a) Ramachandran, P. V.; Pratihar, D.; Biswas, D.; Srivastava, A.; Reddy,
M. V. R. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 481–484.
(9) (b) Nyzam, V.; Belaud, C.; Villie´ras, J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1993, 34, 6899–
6902.
(10) See Supporting Information for details.
(11) Crouch, R. D. Tetrahedron 2004, 60, 5833–5871.
(12) Grieco, P. A.; Gilman, S.; Nishizawa, M. J. Org. Chem. 1976, 41, 1485–
1486.
(13) Crystallographic data (excluding structure factors) for the structure of 9
have been deposited with the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Center as
supplementary publication no. CCDC-756958. Copies of the data can be
(14) For example, see: (a) Chatterjee, A. K.; Morgan, J. P.; Scholl, M.; Grubbs,
R. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 3783–3784. (b) Hekking, K. F. W.;
van Delft, F. L.; Rutjes, F. P. J. T. Tetrahedron 2003, 59, 6571–6758.
(15) Brown, H. C.; Krishnamurthy, S. Tetrahedron 1979, 35, 567–607.
(16) Coss´ıo, F. P.; Aizpurua, J. M.; Palomo, C. Can. J. Chem. 1986, 64, 225–
231.
(17) The NMR spectral data and the optical rotation of synthetic 1 were in full
agreement with that of natural chinensiolide B (+)-1.3,9 We thank Prof.
M. Ando for supplying a copy of the 1H NMR spectrum of isolated (+)-1.
As it has been shown that (+)-1 obtained from the natural source can be
converted into chinensiolide C in three steps, this total synthesis of 1 also
constitutes a formal total synthesis of chinensiolide C in 18 steps for the
longest linear sequence.
JA9104478
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 132, NO. 5, 2010 1489