Patil et al.
JOCNote
TABLE 1. Scope with 2-Aminobenzamidesa
entry
1
3
time (h)
yieldb,c (%)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
1a, R1 = R2 = R3 = R4 = R5 = R6 = H
1b, R3 = Me, R1 = R2 = R4 = R5 = R6 = H
1c, R2 = Me, R1 = R3 = R4 = R5 = R6 = H
1d, R2 = R4 = Me, R1 = R3 = R5 = R6 = H
1e, R2 = OMe, R1 = R3 = R4 = R5 = R6 = H
1f, R2 = R3 = OMe, R1 = R4 = R5 = R6 = H
1g, R3 = Cl, R1 = R2 = R4 = R5 = R6 = H
1h, R1 = Cl, R2 = R3 = R4 = R5 = R6 = H
1i, R2 = Cl, R4 = Me, R1= R3 = R5 = R6 = H
1j, R2 = Br, R1 = R3 = R4 = R5 = R6 = H
1k, R1 = F, R2 = R3 = R4 = R5 = R6 = H
1l, R6 = Bn, R1 = R2 = R3 = R4 = R5 = H
1m, R5 = Me, R1 = R2 = R3 = R4 = R6 = H
1n, R5 = Bn, R1 = R2 = R3 = R4 = R6 = H
3a
3b
3c
3d
3e
3f
3g
3h
3i
3j
3k
3l
3m
3n
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
24
30
30
96 (94)
97
94 (70)
91 (85)
84
62
95
85
89
97
94 (85)
76
69
60
aReaction conditions: 0.59 mmol of 1, 0.59 mmol of 2a, 5 mol % of catalyst, MeOH (0.4 M), 80 °C. bIsolated yields. cTwo catalysts were employed:
(a) 5 mol % of PtBr2, (b) 5 mol % of Au(PPh3)Cl/10 mol % of AgOTf. Yields in parentheses refer to those obtained by Au catalyst.
Overall, the process can be referred to as formal Markow-
nikoff’s double hydroamination of alkynes. Although
formal or direct hydroalkoxylation-hydroarylation,7
double hydroalkoxylation,8 hydroamination-hydroary-
lation,9 double hydroarylation,10 and hydroamination-
hydroalkoxylation11 of alkynes have recently been
reported, to the best of our knowledge, there is no prece-
dence for the analogues’ double-hydroamination process12
as described in Figure 2.
In order to explore the hypothesis, 2-aminobenzamide 1a
and 4-pentyn-1-ol 2a (n = 1, R7 = R8 = H)13 was treated
with 5 mol % of alkynophilic catalysts14 in various solvents
at variable temperature. We were delighted to find15 that
PtBr2 and Au(PPh3)Cl/AgOTf catalysts in methanol gave
product 3a in 96 and 94% yields, respectively (Table 1,
entry 1).16 Treatment of methyl- and methoxy-substituted
2-aminobenzamide 1b-f with 2a under the platinum cata-
lysis (or gold catalysis wherever specified) gave 3b-f in high
yields (entries 2-6). As can be judged from entries 7-11,
halo-substituted amines can also be tolerated without affect-
ing yields in the formal double-hydroamination of alkynes.
Further investigations on the groups on the amines were then
pursued. The substrate 1l containing a benzyl group on amide
nitrogen when reacted with 2a in the presence of 5 mol % of
PtBr2 for 24 h, afforded tetrahydroquinazolinones 3l
in 76% yield (entries 12). However, the use of methyl and
benzyl groups on the aromatic amine seems to hamper
the reaction rate, and therefore, a longer reaction time was
needed to obtain the products in acceptable yields (entries 13
and 14).
(6) (a) Patil, N. T.; Kavthe, R. D.; Raut, V. S.; Reddy, V. V. N. J. Org.
Chem. 2009, 74, 6315–6318. For other reports on alkyne activation from our
laboratory, see: (b) Patil, N. T.; Konala, A.; Singh, V.; Reddy, V. V. N. Eur.
J. Org. Chem. 2009, 5178–5184. (c) Patil, N. T.; Raut, V. S.; Kavthe, R. D.;
Reddy, V. V. N.; Raju, P. V. K. Tetrahedron Lett. 2009, 50, 6576–6579.
ꢁ
~ ꢁ
(7) (a) Barluenga, J.; Fernandez, A.; Rodrıguez, F.; Fananas, F. J.
´
~
ꢁ
ꢁ
J. Organomet. Chem. 2009, 694, 546–550. (b) Fananas, F. J.; Fernandez, A.;
Cevic, D.; Rodrıguez, F. J. Org. Chem. 2009, 74, 932–934. (c) Bhuvaneswari,
S.; Jeganmohan, M.; Cheng, C.-H. Chem.;Eur. J. 2007, 13, 8285–8293.
´
ꢁ
ꢁ
~ ꢁ
(d) Barluenga, J.; Dieguez, A.; Fernandez, A.; Rodrıguez, F.; Fananas, F. J.
´
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 2091–2093. (e) Hashmi, A. S. K.; Schwartz,
L.; Choi, J.-H.; Frost, T. M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 2285–2288.
ꢁ
ꢁ
ꢁ
(8) (a) Barluenga, J.; Fernandez, A.; Satrustegui, A.; Dieguez, A.;
~ ꢁ
Rodrıguez, F.; Fananas, F. J. Chem.;Eur. J. 2008, 14, 4153–4156.
´
ꢁ
ꢁ
(b) Dieguez-Vazquez, A.; Tzschucke, C. C.; Lam, W. Y.; Ley, S. V. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 209–212. (c) Zhang, Y.; Xue, J.; Xin, Z.; Xie, Z.; Li,
Y. Synlett 2008, 940–944. (d) Li, Y.; Zhou, F.; Forsyth, C. J. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 279–282. (e) Dai, L.-Z.; Qi, M.-J.; Shi, Y.-L.; Liu, X.-G.;
Shi, M. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 3191–3194. (f) Belting, V.; Krause, N. Org. Lett.
2006, 8, 4489–4492. (g) Liu, B.; De Brabander, J. K. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 4907–
^
4910. (h) Genin, E.; Antoniotti, S.; Michelet, V.; Genet, J.-P. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 4949–4953. (i) Antoniotti, S.; Genin, E.; Michelet, V.;
Genet, J.-P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 9976–9977.
(9) (a) Muratore, M. E.; Holloway, C. A.; Pilling, A. W.; Storer, R. I.;
Trevitt, G.; Dixon, D. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 10796–10797.
(b) Yang, T.; Campbell, L.; Dixon, D. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 12070–
12071. (c) Yi, C. S.; Yun, S. Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 17000–17006.
(10) (a) Ferrer, C.; Amijs, C. H. M.; Echavarren, A. M. Chem.;Eur. J.
2007, 13, 1358–1373. (b) Hashmi, A. S. K.; Blanco, M. C. Eur. J. Org. Chem.
2006, 4340–4342. (c) ref 7b.
€
(14) Selected recent reviews on pi-activation chemistry: (a) Furstner, A.
Chem. Soc. Rev. 2009, 38, 3208–3221. (b) Patil, N. T.; Yamamoto, Y. Chem.
Rev. 2008, 108, 3395–3442. (c) Kirsch, S. F. Synthesis 2008, 3183–3204.
(d) Gorin, D. J.; Sherry, B. D.; Toste, F. D. Chem. Rev. 2008, 108, 3351–3378.
(e) Li, Z.; Brouwer, C.; He, C. Chem. Rev. 2008, 108, 3239–3265. (f) Arcadi,
A. Chem. Rev. 2008, 108, 3266–3325. (g) Bongers, N.; Krause, N. Angew.
(11) Shimada, T.; Yamamoto, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 6646–
€
6647.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 2178–2181. (h) Furstner, A.; Davies, P. W. Angew.
(12) For reactions involving double hydroamination but differing con-
ceptually, see: Zhang, Y.; Donahue, J. P.; Li, C.-J. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 627–
630.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 3410–3449. (i) Hashmi, A. S. K. Chem. Rev. 2007,
107, 3180–3211. (j) Gorin, D. J.; Toste, F. D. Nature 2007, 446, 395–403.
ꢁ
ꢁ~
(k) Jimenez-Nunez, E.; Echavarren, A. M. Chem. Commun. 2007, 333–346.
(l) Hashmi, A. S. K.; Hutchings, G. J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 7896–
7936. (m) Ma, S.; Yu, S.; Gu, Z. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 200–203.
(n) Nevado, C.; Echavarren, A. M. Synthesis 2005, 167–182.
(13) A cascade process triggered by the cyclization of alkynols for entirely
ꢁ
ꢁ
different transformations, see: (a) Barluenga, J.; Fernandez, A.; Dieguez, A.;
~ ꢁ
´
guez, F.; Fananas, F. J. Chem.;Eur. J. 2009, 15, 11660–11667.
Rodrı
(b) Barluenga, J.; Mendoza, A.; Rodrı
Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 1644–1647. (c) Barluenga, J.; Mendoza, A.; Rodrı
~
ꢁ
´
guez, F.; Fananas, F. J. Angew. Chem.,
guez, F.;
Fananas, F. J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 7044–7047. (d) Barluenga, J.;
(15) See the Supporting Information for details.
´
(16) Several diamines were reacted with 2a with various catalysts; how-
ever, the desired product could not be obtained. Only 2-aminobenzamides
worked well indicating that the special electronic nature of both the amines is
responsible for this formal double-hydroamination reaction to occur.
~
ꢁ
~ ꢁ
´
Mendoza, A.; Rodrıguez, F.; Fananas, F. J. Chem.;Eur. J. 2008, 14, 10892–
10895.
1278 J. Org. Chem. Vol. 75, No. 4, 2010