S. Léger et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 20 (2010) 499–502
501
Ring systems of different size and polarity were evaluated for
F3C
their ability to retain potency while reducing the potential for
CYP inhibition. When bicyclic systems like benzothiazoles or benz-
imidazoles were used to replace the imidazole, the resultant loss in
SCD potency prompted us to focus on small heterocycles (data not
shown). Several small heterocycles were evaluated; some were not
pursued due to potential metabolic stability issues like the 1,2,4-
oxadiazoles,16 while others did not provide the required potency
profile. Table 3 illustrates a series of 1,3,4-oxa and thia-diazoles
which demonstrated the targeted profile. Substitution at the 5-po-
sition was evaluated in order to optimize potency. Comparison of
the unsubstituted oxadiazole 9a with other 5-alkyl analogs reveals
that substitution is beneficial for SCD potency.
MeO2C
N
N
11
12
O
N N
a, b
F3C
O
O
AcN N
H H
N N
c
F3C
Me
S
N
N
O
However, comparison of analogs b with d and e, reveals that the
size of the aliphatic substituent cannot be large. The potency is not
significantly affected by addition of polarity in this area of the mol-
ecule and a hydroxymethyl group is well tolerated (9g).
N
N N
MF-438
Scheme 2. Reagents and conditions: (a) hydrazine hydrate, MeOH, reflux 2 h; (b)
AcCl, Hunig’s base, CH2Cl2, 1 h; (c) P2S5, xylene, 160 °C, 16 h.
In the thiadiazole series the methyl analog 10b, or MF-438, was
identified as the most promising compound in this series. MF-438
is readily accessible from the methyl ester analog 11 of acid 516 in
three steps. First, conversion of the ester to a hydrazide followed
by acetylation afforded compound 12. Direct formation of 12 from
ester 11 using acethydrazide consistently gave unsatisfactory
yields and a stepwise approach was found to be more efficient. Fi-
nally the formation of the thiazole was achieved by refluxing com-
pound 12 with phosphorus pentasulfide in a high boiling, non-
polar solvent17 (Scheme 2).
MF-438 has an overall good pharmacokinetic profile in rodents.
Oral bioavailability was 73% in mice and 38% in rats with half-lives
of 6.4 and 6.0 h, respectively. A circulating metabolite resulting
from the oxidation of the methyl of the thiazole to the hydroxy-
methyl (10g) was observed in both species at all time points, but
was present at only approximately 10% of the concentration of
the parent compound.
Upon chronic dosing in animal models, this compound dis-
played adverse effects similar to other SCD inhibitors recently re-
ported.13,19 After approximately one week of qd dosing with MF-
438 at 5 mg/kg in DIO mice, the first symptoms of alopecia and
partial eye closure began to appear. The severity and the time at
which these adverse effects were observed were directly related
to the dose being administered. Similar adverse effect patterns
were observed in other rodent models such as the obese diabetic
Zucker rats.20 Importantly, these adverse effects were shown to
be reversible upon cessation of treatment.
In conclusion we have described the SAR which led to the iden-
tification of MF-438, a potent SCD inhibitor. The in vivo metabolic
and pharmacokinetic profiles of MF-438 are greatly improved over
previously described amide-based inhibitors, thus enabling this
compound to serve as a valuable tool for in vivo assessment of
SCD inhibition.
The CYP inhibition issues encountered with the imidazole com-
pound 8p was resolved with the thiadiazole analog. MF-438 does
not inhibit either CYP3A4 or CYP2D6 at concentrations up to 30 lM.
References and notes
The long half-lives observed in rodents make this compound
suitable for once-daily dosing and as such MF-438 became an
excellent tool for in vivo assessment of SCD inhibition. Indeed, this
compound was found to be very potent in vivo in a mouse liver PD
assay which measures SCD inhibition in the liver of mice on a high
carbohydrate diet.18 The studied compound was administered PO
followed by an IV administration of a 14C labeled stearic acid tracer,
1 h later. After an additional 2 h, mouse livers were harvested and
analyzed for their lipid content. Inhibition of SCD activity in the li-
ver was determined by comparing the conversion of 14C-stearic
acid to 14C-oleic acid of treated animals versus a vehicle control
group. MF-438 exhibited an ED50 between 1 and 3 mg/kg in this
mouse model.
1. Shanklin, J.; Whittle, E.; Fox, B. G. Biochemistry 1994, 33, 12787.
2. Wang, J.; Yu, L.; Schmidt, R. E.; Su, C.; Huang, X.; Gould, K.; Cao, G. Biochem.
Biophys. Res. Commun. 2005, 332, 735.
3. Jiang, G.; Li, Z.; Liu, F.; Ellsworth, K.; Dallas-Yang, Q.; Wu, M.; Ronan, J.; Esau, C.;
Murphy, C.; Szalkowski, D.; Bergeron, R.; Doebber, T.; Zhang, B. B. J. Clin. Invest.
2005, 115, 1030.
4. Miyazaki, M.; Flowers, M. T.; Sampath, H.; Chu, K.; Otzelberger, C.; Liu, X.;
Ntambi, J. M. Cell Metab. 2007, 6, 484.
5. Savransky, V.; Jun, J.; Li, J.; Nanayakkara, A.; Fonti, S.; Moser, A. B.; Steele, K. E.;
Schweitzer, M. A.; Patil, S. P.; Bhanot, S.; Schwartz, A. R.; Polotsky, V. Y. Circ. Res.
2008, 103, 1173.
6. Attie, A. D.; Krauss, R. M.; Gray-Keller, M. P.; Brownlie, A.; Miyazaki, M.;
Kastelein, J. J.; Lusis, A. J.; Stalenhoef, A. F. H.; Stoehr, J. P.; Hayden, M. R.;
Ntambi, J. M. J. Lipid Res. 2002, 43, 1899.
7. Hulver, M. W.; Berggren, J. R.; Carper, M. J.; Miyazaki, M.; Ntambi, J. M.;
Hoffman, E. P.; Thyfault, J. P.; Stevens, R.; Dohm, G. L.; Houmard, J. A.; Muoio, D.
M. Cell Metab. 2005, 2, 251.
8. Koltun, D. O.; Parkhill, E. Q.; Vasilevich, N. I.; Glushkov, A. I.; Zilbershtein, T. M.;
Ivanov, A. V.; Cole, A. G.; Henderson, I.; Zautke, N. A.; Brunn, S. A.; Mollova, N.;
Leung, K.; Chisholm, J. W.; Zablocki, J. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2009, 19, 2048.
9. Koltun, D. O.; Vasilevich, N. I.; Parkhill, E. Q.; Glushkov, A. I.; Zilbershtein, T. M.;
Mayboroda, E. I.; Boze, M. A.; Cole, A. G.; Henderson, I.; Zautke, N. A.; Brunn, S.
A.; Chu, N.; Hao, J.; Mollova, N.; Leung, K.; Chisholm, J. W.; Zablocki, J. Bioorg.
Med. Chem. Lett. 2009, 19, 3050.
Table 3
SAR summary of heterocyclic-pyridazine compounds
F3C
R
X
9 X = O
10 X = S
N
O
N
N
N
N
10. Koltun, D. O.; Zilbershtein, T. M.; Migulin, V. A.; Vasilevich, N. I.; Parkhill, E. Q.;
Glushkov, A. I.; McGregor, M. J.; Brunn, S. A.; Chu, N.; Hao, J.; Mollova, N.;
Leung, K.; Chisholm, J. W.; Zablocki, J. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2009, 19, 4070.
11. Uto, Y.; Ogata, T.; Harada, J.; Kiyotsuka, Y.; Ueno, Y.; Miyazawa, Y.; Kurata, H.;
Deguchi, T.; Watanabe, N.; Takagi, T.; Wakimoto, S.; Okuyama, R.; Abe, M.;
Kurikawa, N.; Kawamura, S.; Yamato, M.; Osumi, J. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett.
2009, 19, 4151.
12. Uto, Y.; Ogata, T.; Kiyotsuka, Y.; Miyazawa, Y.; Ueno, Y.; Kurata, H.; Deguchi, T.;
Yamada, M.; Watanabe, N.; Takagi, T.; Wakimoto, S.; Okuyama, R.; Konishi, M.;
Kurikawa, N.; Kono, K.; Osumi, J. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2009, 19, 4159.
13. Li, C. S.; Belair, L.; Guay, J.; Murgasva, R.; Sturkenboom, W.; Ramtohul, Y. K.;
Zhang, L.; Huang, Z. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2009, 19, 5214.
Compound
R
rSCD1 IC50 (nM)
X = O
X = S
—
2.3 MF-438
8.8
37
710
6.1
3.2
a
b
c
d
e
f
H
22
Me
i-Pr
i-Bu
t-Bu
OH
6.0
3.9
15
980
—
g
CH2OH
2.9