Fluorophores for Single Molecule Applications
added. The resulting highly colored precipitate was filtered and collected
at the pump, dried in a dessicator, and purified using column chromatog-
raphy (20% hexane in DCM). Yield of 1=70%; m.p.: 195–1968C;
1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3, see Figure S1 in the Supporting Informa-
tion): d=10.23 (brt, 1H, NH), 8.66 (d, J=7.8 Hz, 1H, ArH), 8.36 (d, J=
7.8, 1H, ArH), 8.1 (s, 1H, ArH), 5.9–6.1 (m, 3H, allyl H), 5.1–5.4 (m,
6H, allyl H), 4.83 (dt, J=5.8, 1.4 Hz, 2H, CH2), 4.77 (dt, J=5.8, 1.4 Hz,
2H, CH2), 4.23 ppm (m, 2H, CH2); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3, see Fig-
ure S2 in the Supporting Information): d=166.0, 163.1, 162.8, 162.7,
152.5, 132.7, 132.2, 131.7, 131.6, 131.2, 129.6, 127.9, 126.2, 124.9, 123.7,
120.2, 119.6, 118.5, 118.0, 117.7, 45.5, 43.0, 42.5 ppm; MS (MALDI-TOF):
402.1 (100%), (M+H)+; UV/Vis (tol): lmax (e)=350, 368, 515 nm
(11000); Fluorescence (tol): lmax =551 nm. Yield of 2 is 70%; m.p.: 223–
2248C; 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3, see Figure S3 in the Supporting In-
formation): d=9.5 (brt, 1H, NH), 8.16 (s, 2H, ArH), 5.9–6.1 (m, 4H,
allyl H), 5.1–5.5 (m, 8H, allyl H),4.81 (dt, J=5.5, 1.3 Hz, 4H, CH2), 4.1–
4.2 ppm (m, 4H, CH2); 13C NMR (100, CDCl3, see Figure S4 in the Sup-
porting Information): d=165.8, 149.1, 133.4, 132.1, 125.7, 121.2, 118.6,
117.8, 117.6, 117.3, 102.0, 45.4, 42.4, 29.7 ppm; MS (MALDI-TOF): 456.1
(100%), [M]+; UV/Vis (tol): lmax (e)=346, 362, 602 nm (13100); Fluores-
cence (tol): lmax =629 nm.
Acknowledgements
This project is supported by Australian Research Council Discovery Proj-
ect DP0664163. TDMB gratefully acknowledges The University of Mel-
bourne Faculty of Science for the award of a Centenary Research Fellow-
ship. We would like to thank the CRC Smartprint for financial assistance
in the form of a Scholarship to CHJ The authors also thank Dr. Scott
Watkins for the depth profile measurements on polymer film samples,
Dr. Michel Sliwa for technical assistance with the single molecule meas-
urements and we acknowledge the contributions of Matthew Belousoff
and Dr. Craig Forsyth in their help in obtaining crystallographic data.
[4] A. C. Grimsdale, T. Vosch, M. Lor, M. Cotlet, S. Habuchi, J. Hofk-
[5] F. C. De Schryver, T. Vosch, M. Cotlet, M. Van der Auweraer, K.
[6] G. Andric, J. F. Boas, A. M. Bond, G. D. Fallon, K. P. Ghiggino, C. F.
Hogan, J. A. Hutchison, M. A. P. Lee, S. J. Langford, J. R. Pilbrow,
[7] M. Cotlet, T. Vosch, S. Habuchi, T. Weil, K. Mꢃllen, J. Hofkens, F.
[8] F. Wꢃrthner, S. Ahmed, C. Thalacker and T. Debaerdemaeker,
Single Crystal X-ray Diffraction Experiment
Single crystals of 5 were grown by vapor diffusion of water into a DMSO
solution of 5. X-ray diffraction data was collected on a Nonius Kappa
CCD diffractometer (graphite-monochromated MoKa radiation, l=
0.71073 ꢂ). Structures were solved by direct methods (SHELXS-97) and
refined by full-matrix least-squares calculations on F2 with the SHELX-
TL program package. Non-hydrogen atoms were refined anisotropically.
CCDC 649279. contains the supplementary crystallographic data for this
paper. These data can be obtained free of charge from The Cambridge
[10] C. Thalacker, A. Miura, S. De Feyter, F. C. De Schryver, F. Wꢃrth-
[11] C. Rçger, S. Ahmed, F. Wꢃrthner, Synthesis 2007, 1872–1876.
[14] H. Vollmann, H. Becker, M. Corell, H. Streeck, Liebigs Ann. Chem.
1937, 531, 1–159.
[15] S. Bhosale, A. L. Sisson, P. Talukdar, A. Fꢃrstenberg, N. Banerji, E.
Vauthey, G. Bollot, J. Mareda, C. Rçger, F. Wꢃrthner, N. Sakai, S.
[16] C. Rçger, M. G. Muller, M. Lysetska, Y. Miloslavina, A. R. Holz-
[17] B. A. Jones, A. Facchetti, T. J. Marks, M. R. Wasielewski, Chem.
[18] P. Jacquignon, N. P. Buu-Hoi, M. Mangane, Bull. Soc. Chim. Fr.
1964, 10, 2517–2523.
Photophysical Measurements
Absorption spectra were recorded using a Varian Cary 50 spectropho-
tometer and fluorescence spectra were measured using a Varian Cary
Eclipse fluorescence spectrophotometer. Fluorescence spectra were cor-
rected for differences in detection efficiency with emission wavelength.
All ensemble samples were prepared using spectrophotometric grade sol-
vents used as received from Aldrich and degassed using successive
freeze-pump-thaw cycles. Fluorescence decay profiles were recorded
using the time-correlated single photon counting technique as outlined
elsewhere.[26] The excitation source was an optical parametric oscillator
(OPO, Coherent) which provided ~100 fs FWHM pulses at 100 kHz. The
OPO was pumped by a regeneratively amplified mode-locked Ti:sap-
phire laser (Coherent Mira). Compounds 1 and 2 were excited at 510 nm
and 590 nm, respectively. Emission from the sample was passed through
a polarizer oriented at 54.78 relative to the vertically polarized excitation
light thereby removing any anisotropic effects from the decay. Sample
emission was passed through a single grating monochromator (Jobin
Yvon H-10), and detected with a microchannel plate photomultiplier
tube (Eldy, EM1–132).
[19] F. Chaignon, M. Falkenstrçm, S. Karlsson, E. Blart, F. Odobel, L.
[20] Two regioisomers are likely from the dibromination, those placed
antipodally that is, 2,6-positions and the 2,7-dibromo NDA regioiso-
mer. In our work, as with others, we only see evidence for the 2,6-di-
bromo isomer by NMR spectroscopy. If the other isomer forms in
>5% yield, it is indistinguishable by both chromatographic and
NMR spectroscopic techniques. The result can be explained in
terms of buttressing restraints, but we cannot discount the formation
of the other regioisomer conclusively.
Single Molecule Studies
Samples for single molecule analysis were prepared by spin-casting (60 s
at 2000 rpm) dilute solutions (~10ꢀ10 m) of 1 or 2 in toluene containing
~10 mgmLꢀ1 of poly(methyl methacrylate) onto thoroughly cleaned glass
coverslips. Film thicknesses were checked by depth profiling (Veeco
Dektak) and were found to be ~80–100 nm. Single molecules were excit-
ed by 543 nm light at 4 MHz, 1–2 ps FWHM, provided by an OPO (Spec-
tra Physics) pumped by a regeneratively amplified Ti:sapphire laser
(Spectra Physics). The light was directed into an inverted microscope
(Olympus IX70) and focused at the sample through a 1.4 N.A. oil-immer-
sion objective (Zeiss 100x). Fluorescence was collected through the same
objective, split 50:50 and directed onto an avalanche photodiode
(Perkin–Elmer) and through a spectrograph (Acton 150i) onto a liquid
N2 cooled CCD camera (Princeton). Details of the SM detection arrange-
ment are published elsewhere.[27]
[21] The low solubility of this compound and lack of protons within its
structure (C14O6Br4) makes it difficult to characterize the product by
traditional means. However, mass spectrometry gave data consistent
with 5, in particular the diagnostic isotopic pattern expected for ad-
dition of four bromine atoms to the starting anhydride.
[22] Crystal data for 5: M.p.:>3508C; C14Br4O6: M=579.64, Colorless
rectangular prisms, 0.21ꢄ0.14ꢄ0.13 mm3, triclinic, space group P-1,
a=6.4747(13), b=7.5706(15), c=12.434(3) ꢂ, a=91.28(3), b=
103.27(3),
g=114.24(3)8,
V=536.22(26) ꢂ3,
Z=1,
1cald =
2.292 gcmꢀ3, F000 =356, MoKa radiation l=0.71073 ꢂ, T=173(2) K,
2qmax =56.18, 9652 reflections collected, 2554 unique (Rint =0.0501).
Chem. Asian J. 2009, 4, 1542 – 1550
ꢀ 2009 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
1549