M. Dukat et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 14 (2004) 3651–3654
3653
antinociceptive action in the mouse tail-flick assay (Ta-
ble 2). Interestingly, compound 3d was found to be twice
as potent as (ꢀ)-nicotine. The antinociceptive actions of
3d following subcutaneous administration were evident
for 120 min, relative to 30 min for nicotine (data not
shown). In addition, the antinociceptive effects, unlike
those of nicotine, were not antagonized by the non-
competitive nACh antagonist mecamylamine (1 mg/kg)
nor the competitive antagonist dihydro-b-erythroidine
(1 mg/kg) (data not shown). Similar results were ob-
tained in the mouse hot-plate assay. Administered via
the intrathecal route, 3d was equipotent with (ꢀ)-nico-
tine in the tail-flick assay. In contrast, compounds
3a and 3b were inactive both in the tail-flick and
hot-plate assays, whereas 3b was nearly equipotent
with 3d and nicotine when administered via the
intrathecal route. Compound 3c was inactive in the
tail-flick assay and nearly 20 times less potent than 3d in
the hot-plate assay. In summary, several of the
compounds displayed antinociceptive action, but only
3d was active under all three assay conditions––and
was at least equipotent with (ꢀ)-nicotine in these
assays.
N
CH3
N
H
N
H3CO
N
9
10
In summary, with respect to interaction at a4b2 nACh
receptors, it is quite doubtful that the aminotetrahy-
droisoquinolines 3, represent pharmacologically impor-
tant conformations of 1 due to their low affinity.
Nevertheless, compound 3d in particular displayed an-
tinociceptive actions both in the tail-flick and hot-plate
assays and, as such, might represent an interesting
structural and mechanistic template for further devel-
opment of novel analgesic agents.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported, in part, by funding from DA
05274 and the British Technology Group (BTG). The
authors are also grateful to Drs. Ken Kellar and
Yingxian Xiao (Georgetown University) for providing
us with a radioligand binding profile for 3d at the cloned
nACh receptor subtypes.
With its low affinity for a4b2 nACh receptors, and the
inability to antagonize its effects with nACh antagonists,
it is difficult to reconcile the actions of 3d with a nico-
tinic receptor mechanism unless there is involvement of
a nACh receptor subtype other than a4b2 receptors.
Compound 3d was evaluated at several such subtypes
and found to show little affinity: a2b2 (Ki ¼
10; 200 ꢁ 1700 nM), a2b4 (Ki ¼ 49; 900 ꢁ 4800 nM),
a3b2 (Ki ¼ 4410 ꢁ 730 nM), a3b4 (Ki ¼ 46; 900 ꢁ
3200 nM), a4b2 (Ki ¼ 5860 ꢁ 880 nM), a4b4 (Ki ¼
40; 000 ꢁ 1600 nM), a6b4 (Ki ¼ 49; 400 ꢁ 4100 nM), a7
(Ki ¼ 10; 500 ꢁ 200 nM). Of course, the possibility exists
that 3d might still be acting via a subtype that was not
specifically examined. However, because a4b2 receptors
represent a major population of nACh receptors in
mammalian brain, it seems unlikely that 3d produces its
antinociceptive effects via such a mechanism. Com-
pound 3d was also examined at 75 other neurotrans-
mitter receptors (CEREP) and displayed remarkably
low affinity for each; for example: Ki > 10; 000 nM for
hA1, hA2, and hA3 adenosine receptors, a1-, a2-, hb1-,
hb2-adrenergic receptors, central and peripheral BZ
receptors, hD1–D5 dopamine receptors, H1 and H2 his-
tamine receptors, hm1–m5 muscarinic cholinergic
References and notes
1. Glennon, R. A.; Dukat, M.; Liao, L. Curr. Top. Med.
Chem. 2004, 4, 631–644.
2. Glennon, R. A. Prog. Med. Chem. 2004, 42, 55–123.
3. Glennon, R. A.; Fiedler, W.; Dukat, M.; Damaj, I.; Martin,
B. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 1996, 31, 875–888.
4. Cheng, Y.-X.; Dukat, M.; Dowd, M.; Fiedler, W.; Martin,
B.; Damaj, M. I.; Glennon, R. A. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 1999,
34, 177–190.
5. Ullrich, T.; Krich, S.; Binder, D.; Mereiter, K.; Anderson,
D. J.; Meyer, M. D.; Pyerin, M. J. J. Med. Chem. 2002, 45,
4047–4054.
6. Glassco, W.; Suchocki, J.; George, C.; Martin, B. R.; May,
E. L. J. Med. Chem. 1993, 36, 3381–3385.
7. Vernier, J.-M.; Holsenback, H.; Cosford, N. D. P.; Whit-
ten, J. P.; Menzaghi, F.; Reid, R.; Rao, T. S.; Sacaan, A. I.;
Lloyd, K.; Suto, C. M.; Chavez-Noriega, L. E.; Washburn,
M. S.; Urrutia, A.; McDonald, I. A. Bioorg. Med. Chem.
Lett. 1998, 8, 2173–2178.
receptors, l-, d-, and j-opioid receptors, h5-HT1A
,
5-HT1B, 5-HT2B, 5-HT2C, 5-HT3, 5-HT5A, 5-HT6, and 5-
HT7 serotonin receptors, nor did it bind at the norepi-
nephrine or dopamine transporter, or to Kþ, Naþ,
Caþþ, or Clꢀ ion channels.
8. Assays were performed as previously detailed in: Dukat,
M.; Damaj, I. M.; Young, R.; Vann, R.; Collins, A. C.;
Marks, M. J.; Martin, B. R.; Glennon, R. A. Eur. J.
Pharmacol. 2002, 435, 171–180. In brief, the binding assay
was conducted using rat brain (minus cerebellum) homo-
genates and [3H](ꢀ)-nicotine as radioligand. IC50 values
were determined from a plot of the log concentration versus
percent displacement and converted to Ki values (at least in
triplicate). The tail-flick assay employed male ICR mice
(20–25 g; Harlan Laboratories, Indianapolis, IN) that were
housed in an AALAC approved facility in groups of six
and had free access to food and water. The study was
approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Com-
mittee of VCU. The antinociceptive response was calcu-
lated as percent maximum possible effect (%MPE) where
Compounds 96 and 107 are other examples of previously
reported conformationally-constrained nicotine analogs.
Both lack significant affinity for a4b2 nACh receptors
yet possess antinociceptive character. Whereas the an-
tinociceptive action of 10 was attenuated by mecamyl-
amine,7 that of 9,6 like that of 3d, was not. The
aminotetrahydroisoquinoline moiety common to 3d and
9 and might be responsible for their antinociceptive
properties.