374 Organometallics, Vol. 21, No. 2, 2002
Carter et al.
pentaphenylcyclopentadienyl analogue [(η5-C5Ph5)Fe-
(CO)2]-.9 Moreover, with the exception of the parent
cyclopentadienyl compound [(η5-Cp)Fe(CO)2]-,10 the ion-
pairing phenomena exhibited by the other cyclopendi-
enyl derivatives in this family are not well-docu-
mented,11 despite the fact that ion pairing plays a
critical role in the stabilization of the metallocarboxy-
lates that are obtained from the reaction of these iron
anions with CO2.6e,12,13 Herein we report our data on
the temperature-dependent IR behavior of the com-
pounds [(η5-pentadienyl)Fe(CO)2][Na] (pentadienyl )
MeCp, C5Me5, C5Ph5, C9H7) in THF solution and the
thermodynamics for the various ion pairs present in
THF solution. The X-ray crystal structure of [(η5-C5Ph5)-
Fe(CO)2][PPN] has been determined, and the reactivity
of [(η5-C5Ph5)Fe(CO)2]- with CO2 was investigated and
found to afford the carboxylate complex [(η5-C5Ph5)Fe-
(CO)2(CO2)]- when lithium was employed as the gegen-
cation.
resulting [(η5-pentadienyl)Fe(CO)2][Na]. These reactions
proceed without complications, provided moisture and
oxygen are rigorously excluded, and only in the case of
the highly substituted compounds [(η5-C5Me5)Fe(CO)2]2
and [(η5-C5Ph5)Fe(CO)2]2 is the reduction found to occur
slowly (up to several hours). Qualitatively, the pen-
taphenyl iron complex affords the expected carbonyl-
metalate more slowly than the pentamethyl derivative.
Use of (η5-C5Ph5)Fe(CO)2Br in place of the parent dimer
also furnishes [(η5-C5Ph5)Fe(CO)2][Na] without any
noticeable complications.
The IR data for each of the carbonylmetalates are
reported in Table 1. Relative to the starting dimeric
compound or (η5-C5Ph5)Fe(CO)2Br the product carbon-
ylmetalate exhibits a low-energy shifting of the CO
stretching bands consistent with an increased electron
density at the iron center. The anionic pentadienyl
compounds [(η5-MeCp)Fe(CO)2][Na] ([1][Na]), [(η5-C5-
Me5)Fe(CO)2][Na] ([2][Na]), and [(η5-C9H7)Fe(CO)2][Na]
([3][Na]) reveal significantly more complicated IR spec-
tra, as a result of the contact ion pairing (CIP) between
the sodium gegencation and the iron center and a CO
ligand.16 Here there are two symmetric and two anti-
symmetric CO stretches present in THF solution at
room temperature due to the coordination of the sodium
gegencation with the iron center and one of the CO
ligands. For example, in [(η5-MeCp)Fe(CO)2][Na] the
iron-sodium CIPs exhibit two ν(CO) bands observed at
1878 and 1806 cm-1, while the sodium-carbonyl oxygen
CIPs reveal ν(CO) bands at 1860 and 1768 cm-1. These
CO groups in both ion pairs are readily ascribed to the
symmetric and antisymmetric CO stretching modes, on
the basis of group theoretical considerations.17 Equation
1 depicts the equilibrium that exists for this carbonyl-
Resu lts a n d Discu ssion
I. IR Sp ectr a l Da ta for [(η5-p en ta d ien yl)F e(CO)2]-
[Na ]. With the exception of the anionic C5Ph5 derivative,
whose solution chemistry has only been examined with
respect to the 17-electron radical,9 the other three
carbonylmetalates have been prepared via the amalgam
route or from the direct reaction of the corresponding
Fe2 dimer with an alkali-metal reducing agent. Despite
the widespread use of the compounds [(η5-pentadienyl)-
Fe(CO)2][Na] (pentadienyl ) MeCp, C5Me5, C9H7) in a
variety of reactions,,6d,e,14,15 no detailed information has
been published regarding the IR spectral data for these
anions. Accordingly, we reduced each of the dimeric [(η5-
pentadienyl)Fe(CO)2]2 compounds with sodium amal-
gam in THF solution and recorded the IR spectra of the
metalate in THF solution. Unlike the parent cyclopen-
tadienyliron anion [(η5-Cp)Fe(CO)2][Na], which displays
an equilibrating mixture of the above two CIPs and
solvent-separated ion pairs (SSIP),10 the presence of a
single methyl substituent in [2][Na] appears to be
electron donating enough to render the formation of
SSIPs thermodynamically unfavorable. The absence of
SSIPs in [(η5-MeCp)Fe(CO)2]- was verified by the ad-
dition of excess HMPA to a THF solution containing [(η5-
MeCp)Fe(CO)2][Na]. The aforementioned ν(CO) bands
(9) For studies dealing with the radical reactivity of (η5-C5Ph5)Fe-
(CO)2, see: (a) Kuksis, I.; Baird, M. C. Organometallics 1996, 15, 4755.
(b) Kuksis, I.; Baird, M. C.; Preston, K. F. Organometallics 1996, 15,
4991.
(10) Pannell, K. H.; J ackson, D. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1976, 98, 4443.
(11) For a report on the ion-pairing chemistry in [(η5-Me3SiCp)Fe-
(CO)2]- and related silylated-cyclopentadienyl derivatives, see: Ber-
ryhill, S. R.; Clevenger, G. L.; Burdurlu, F. Y. Organometallics 1985,
4, 1509.
(12) Fachinetti, G.; Floriani, C.; Zanazzi, P. F. J . Am. Chem. Soc.
1978, 100, 7405.
(13) For a review outlining many fine examples of the importance
of ion pairing in controlling the reaction pathways in organic and
organometallic chemistry, see: Loupy, A.; Tchoubar, B.; Astruc, D.
Chem. Rev. 1992, 92, 1141.
(15) For reports on the generation and use of [(η5-C9H7)Fe(CO)2]-,
see: (a) Forschner, T. C.; Cutler, A. R. Inorg. Chim. Acta 1985, 102,
113. (b) Forschner, T. C.; Cutler, A. R.; Kullnig, R. K. Organometallics
1987, 6, 889. (c) Levitre, S. A.; Cutler, A. R.; Forschner, T. C.
Organometallics 1989, 8, 1133. (d) Forschner, T. C.; Cutler, A. R. J .
Organomet. Chem. 1989, 361, C41. (e) Theys, R. D.; Vargas, R. M.;
Wang, Q.; Hossain, M. M. Organometallics 1998, 17, 1333.
(16) For reviews on the effect of ion pairing on the spectroscopic
properties and chemical reactivity of organometallic compounds, see:
(a) Darensbourg, M. Y. Prog. Inorg. Chem. 1985, 33, 221. (b) Darens-
bourg, M. Y.; Ash, C. E. Adv. Organomet. Chem. 1987, 27, 1. (c) Kochi,
J . K.; Bockman, T. M. Adv. Organomet. Chem. 1991, 33, 51.
(17) Lukehart, C. M. Fundamental Transition Metal Organometallic
Chemistry; Brooks/Cole: Monterey, CA, 1985.
(14) For reports on the generation and use of [(η5-C5Me5)Fe(CO)2]-,
see: (a) King, R. B.; Douglas, W. M.; Efraty, A. J . Organomet. Chem.
1974, 69, 131. (b) Ellis, J . E.; Fennell, R. W.; Flom, E. A. Inorg. Chem.
1976, 15, 2031. (c) Catheline, D.; Astruc, D. J . Organomet. Chem. 1982,
226, C52. (d) Catheline, D.; Astruc, D. Organometallics 1984, 3, 1094.
(e) Randolph, C. L.; Wrighton, M. S. Organometallics 1987, 6, 365. (f)
Guerchais, V.; Astruc, D. J . Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1985, 835.
(g) McNamara, W. F.; Reisacher, H.-U.; Duesler, E. N.; Paine, R. T.
Organometallics 1988, 7, 1313. (h) Heppert, J . A.; Morgenstern, M.
A.; Scherubel, D. M.; Takusagawa, F.; Shaker, M. R. Organometallics
1988, 7, 1715.