Angewandte
Chemie
c) G. W. Lian, L. Ding, M. Chen, Z. Liu, D. Q. Zhao, J. Z. Ni,
1998, 63, 3911 – 3917; c) G. Mugesh, W.-W. du Mont, C. Wism-
Scheme 7. Reduction of selenenyl iodide 4 to selenol 3 by DTT.
[4] a) W.-W. du Mont, G. Mugesh, C. Wismach, P. G. Jones, Angew.
[5] a) W.-W. du Mont, A. Martens-von Salzen, F. Ruthe, E. Seppala,
G. Mugesh, F. A. Devillanova, V. Lippolis, N. Kuhn, J. Organo-
Chem. News 1994, 2, 18 – 26; c) A. Martens-von Salzen, H. U.
b) M. Ostrowski, I. Wagner, W.-W. du Mont, P. G. Jones, J. Jeske,
Although the physiological cofactor in the reduction of
the selenenyl iodide intermediate to the selenol in the ID-1
catalytic cycle (Scheme 1) has not been identified, the use of
dithiols, including dithiothreitol (DTT), as the second sub-
strate is common for in vitro experiments with the enzyme.[1b]
Treatment of selenenyl iodide 4 with DTT in the molar ratio
of 1:2.4 in the presence of triethylamine produced selenol 3
quantitatively within 20 minutes (Scheme 7).[12]
In summary, the formation of a selenenyl iodide in the
deiodination of a thyroxine derivative by an organoselenol
was demonstrated for the first time by using cavity-shaped
molecules. In conjunction with reduction of the selenenyl
iodide to the parent selenol by a dithiol, all the chemical
transformations included in the ID-1 catalytic cycle were
experimentally established, thus corroborating the involve-
ment of a selenenyl iodide as an intermediate in the
enzymatic reaction. Further investigations on the mechanistic
details of the processes are currently underway.
[7] a) G. Mugesh, A. Panda, H. B. Singh, R. J. Butcher, Chem. Eur.
Experimental Section
Synthesis of selenenyl iodide 4: CCl4 (10 mL) was added to a mixture
of selenol 3 (1.10 g, 1.15 mmol) and N-iodosuccinimide (561 mg,
2.49 mmol) at room temperature. The reaction mixture was stirred for
2 h, filtered through Celite, and the solvent was evaporated.
Recrystallization from n-hexane gave selenenyl iodide 4 (1.23 g,
1.14 mmol, 99%) as purple crystals. 4: m.p. 278.0–281.08C (decomp);
1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): d = 1.07 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 24H), 1.13 (d,
J = 6.8 Hz, 24H), 2.91 (sept, J = 6.8 Hz, 8H), 7.02 (t, J = 1.5 Hz, 2H),
7.17 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 8H), 7.24 (d, J = 1.5 Hz, 4H), 7.30 (t, J = 7.7 Hz,
4H), 7.39–7.49 ppm (m, 3H); 13C NMR (126 MHz, [D6]benzene; s, d,
and q are the multiplicities of the signals in the non-decoupled
spectrum): d = 24.1 (q), 24.5 (q), 30.6 (d), 122.7 (d) ꢀ 2, 128.1 (d), 128.3
(d), 129.2 (d), 129.7 (d), 139.2 (s), 140.5 (s), 142.6 (s), 146.8 (s) ꢀ 2,
149.8 ppm (s); 77Se NMR (95 MHz, CDCl3): d = 465 ppm; UV/Vis
(benzene) lmax 553 nm (e 280); elemental analysis calcd (%) for
C66H77ISe: C 73.66, H 7.21; found: C 73.48, H 7.32. For details of the
reaction of 3 with iodophenols, see the Supporting Information.
ꢀ
[10] 4·2CHCl3: C68H79Cl6ISe, Mr = 1314.87, triclinic, space group P1,
a = 14.499(7), b = 15.452(7), c = 16.293(6) ꢃ, a = 69.028(12), b =
73.775(11), g = 88.047(15)8, V= 3264(2) ꢃ3, Z = 2, 1calcd
=
1.338 gcmÀ3, T= 120 K, m(MoKa) = 1.332 mmÀ1, 21498 measured
reflections, 11269 independent, 729 parameters, R1 = 0.0635 (I >
2s(I)), wR2 = 0.1781 (all data). The intensity data were collected
on a Rigaku/MSC Mercury CCD diffractometer with graphite-
monochromated MoKa radiation (l = 0.71070 ꢃ). The structures
were solved by the direct method and refined by full-matrix least
squares on F2 using SHELXL 97 (G. M. Sheldrick, Program for
Crystal Structure Refinement, University of Gꢁttingen, 1997).
The non-hydrogen atoms were refined anisotropically. The
hydrogen atoms were idealized by using the riding models.
CCDC 750141 contains the supplementary crystallographic data
for this paper. These data can be obtained free of charge from
cam.ac.uk/data_request/cif.
Received: October 15, 2009
Published online: December 8, 2009
Keywords: enzyme models · iodine · reactive intermediates ·
.
selenium · steric hindrance
c) A. C. Bianco, D. Salvatore, B. Gereben, M. J. Berry, P. R.
Enzymol. 2002, 347, 125 – 167; e) G. Kuiper, M. H. A. Kester,
Germain, V. A. Galton, A. Hernandez, Endocrinology 2009, 150,
1097 – 1107.
[11] M. J. Berry, J. Biol. Chem. 1992, 267, 18055 – 18059.
[12] The reduction of selenenyl iodide 2 has been investigated by
du Mont and co-workers.[3c] It was found that the reaction of 2
with monothiols proceeds readily to afford the corresponding
selenenyl sulfides (ArSeSR) although further reduction to the
selenol is very slow.
[2] a) M. J. Berry, J. D. Kieffer, J. W. Harney, P. R. Larsen, J. Biol.
Chem. 1991, 266, 14155 – 14158; b) B. C. Sun, J. W. Harney, M. J.
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 545 –547
ꢀ 2010 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
547