Communications
in benzene at 758C. The reactions were conducted with added
differences were not large. Complex 2 and the diphenylamido
complex 3 reacted at nearly identical rates. The p-chloroa-
mido complex 4 reacted somewhat faster than the ditolyla-
mido complex 2, which suggests that p donation from the aryl
groups may be important. From this assessment, the rate of
reductive elimination is moderately influenced by the elec-
tronic properties of the amido group, and the complexes
containing more electron rich amido groups react faster.
The substitution pattern of the amido group had a
substantial influence on the rate of reductive elimination.
Amido complexes containing substituents at the 3- and 5-
positions of the amido aryl groups reacted more slowly than
those containing a substituent at the 4-position: the di-m-
xylylamide complex 7 underwent reductive elimination more
slowly than di-p-tolylamido complex 2, and complex 6, which
contains trifluoromethyl substituents in the 3- and 5-positions
of the aryl groups on the amido ligand, underwent reductive
elimination by far the most slowly. We do not have a firm
explanation for the difference in the reaction rates of the
complexes containing 3,5-disubstituted and 4-substituted
diarylamido ligands.
dppf to trap the Pd0 product. The benzyl complexes 1–7 and
naphthylmethyl complex 8 underwent reductive elimination
in high yields (Table 1). The mesitylmethyl complex 9 also
3
À
Table 1: C(sp ) N bond-forming reductive elimination.
Complex
R1
R2,R3
Yield [%][a]
t1/2 [min][b]
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Ph
Ph
Ph
Ph
Ph
Ph
Ph
naphthyl
mesityl
Ph
p-OMe
p-tolyl
Ph
p-Cl
62[c]
83
88
87
93[e]
83
63
83
25[g]
0
33[c]
73[d]
72
43
79
p-CF3
3,5-(CF3)2C6H3
3,5-(CH3)2C6H3
3,5-(CF3)2C6H3
3,5-(CF3)2C6H3
H, p-tolyl
p-tolyl
>1400[f]
97
<10[f]
12[f,h]
–
10
11
H
0
–
The observation that complexes containing more electron
rich amido groups underwent reductive elimination more
rapidly than those containing less electron rich amido groups
with the same substitution pattern contrasts with the relative
rates found by Goldberg and co-workers[15] for the reductive
elimination of aryl methyl ethers from methylplatinum(IV)
phenoxide complexes. Given these electronic effects on the
rate of the reaction, it is surprising that the anilido complex 10
does not undergo reductive elimination. Apparently, the
steric properties of the amido ligand have a large impact on
the rate of reductive elimination.
[a] The yield was determined by 1H NMR spectroscopy relative to
trimethoxybenzene as an internal standard. [b] Reactions to determine
rate constants and half-lives were conducted in [D6]benzene at 558C,
unless otherwise noted. The t1/2 values were determined from kobs values
over three half-lives, unless otherwise noted. [c] The reaction was
conducted at 558C in THF. [d] When conducted in THF at 558C, this
reaction occurred with a half-life of 65 min. [e] The reaction was
conducted at 558C. [f] The t1/2 value was estimated by monitoring the
reactions, by 1H NMR spectroscopy with an internal standard, to
approximately 50% conversion. [g] The (2,3,5-trimethylbenzyl)diaryl-
amine was also formed in 26% yield. [h] The reaction was conducted
at 308C.
The effect of the benzyl group on the rate of reductive
elimination was revealed by comparing the reaction of
complex 6 to those of the naphthylmethyl complex 8 and
the more hindered mesitylmethyl complex 9. The naphthyl-
methyl complex 8 and the mesitylmethyl complex 9 reacted
faster than the analogous benzyl complex 6. The rate constant
for reductive elimination from the naphthylmethyl complex 8
was at least 140 times larger than the rate constant for the
underwent reductive elimination, in this case to form a
mixture of the (mesitylmethyl)diarylamine (25%), the (2,3,5-
trimethylbenzyl)diarylamine (26%), and the free diarylamine
by an unknown protonolysis (46%). We presume the (2,3,5-
trimethylbenzyl)diarylamine product forms by rearrange-
ment of the hindered mesitylmethyl complex to the less
hindered 2,3,5-trimethylbenzyl species during the reductive-
elimination process.[14]
In contrast, the less hindered anilide complex 10 and the
methyl complex 11 did not form products of reductive
elimination at 758C. Free H2N(p-tolyl) and bibenzyl formed
upon the heating of anilide complex 10, as determined by GC/
MS, and HN(p-tolyl)2 formed when the diarylamido complex
11 was heated. The proton source in these reactions is
unknown.
Several experiments provided information on the effect of
the electronic properties of the amide ligand on the rate of
this reductive elimination. The half-lives for reactions of the
various amido complexes are included in Table 1. Reductive
elimination from complex 5, which contains an electron-
withdrawing p-CF3 group, was slower than that from the di-p-
tolylamido complex 2, and reductive elimination from com-
plex 1, which contains an electron-donating p-OMe group,
was faster than that from complex 2, although the rate
À
overall C N bond-forming process from 6, and the rate
constant for reductive elimination from the mesitylmethyl
complex 9 (at 308C) was 40–50 times larger than that for
reductive elimination from 6 (at 558C).
The reductive-elimination reactions reported herein could
occur by a concerted, an ionic, or a radical pathway. The
configuration at the benzylic carbon atom can be used to
distinguish these mechanisms. A concerted reductive elimi-
nation would lead to retention of configuration, sequential
dissociation of the amide and backside attack on the benzyl
group would cause inversion of configuration, and reaction
via a benzyl radical would cause racemization at this carbon
atom.
Previously, the stereochemical course of reactions of
metal–benzyl complexes was determined by measurements of
optical rotation or the use of a chiral shift reagent to assess the
configuration of organic products.[16,17] Stille and co-workers
determined that the oxidative addition of benzyl halides to
[Pd(PPh3)4] occurred with inversion of configuration by
794
ꢀ 2010 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 793 –796