of the indentified hits was sequenced to confirm there were not any other
mutations.
can be predicted with a sufficient degree of certainty. This also
applies to laboratory evolution of binding properties, as in the
case of therapeutic proteins.
Procedure for the Enzymatic Oxidation of Substrates. In a typical protocol, 1 mL
reaction system consists of 2.5 mM substrate (added as a concentrated
solution in acetonitrile), 5 mM isopropanol, 100 μM NADPþ, 1.0 μM purified
PAMO mutant enzyme, and 20ADH (2 U) and 50 mM Tris-HCl buffer (pH 8.0).
The mixture in 8 ml glass tube with a sealed cap (to avoid evaporation of
2-alkyl substituted substrates) was shaken at 200 rpm and 30 °C for times
established (between 5–16 h) to control the conversion rate less than 50%
for kinetic resolution. For desymmetrization of rac-3a–c, the reaction time
is 24 h. The reaction was stopped, worked up by extraction with ethyl acetate
(containing 200 mg L−1 internal standard as nonane, dodecane, hexadecane,
and octadecane). The sample was analyzed by achiral and chiral GC to deter-
mine the conversion of and the enantiomeric excess of the residual ketones
and produced lactones. Control experiments were performed for all the
tested substrates with purified WT PAMO enzymes (about 5 μM). Further
Materials and Methods
Library Screening. Individual colonies were placed into 2.2-mL 96-deep-well
plates containing 800 μL of LB media with 100 μg mL−1 carbenicilline by a
colony picker QPIX (Genetix). After cell growth at 37 °C overnight with
shaking at 800 rpm, 10 μL of each preculture was transferred into a new plate
containing 800 μL of TB media supplemented with 0.1% L-arabinose as
inducer and 100 μg mL−1 carbenicilline. The duplicate plates were grown
for an additional 24 h to induce PAMO expression. The cultures were
centrifuged at 3200 × g and 4 °C for 6 min and the supernatants were dis-
carded. The original plates were stored. Each cell pellet was resuspended
in 600 μL of 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0) containing 1 mg mL−1 lysozyme and four
units of DNase I. Lysis were performed at 37 °C and shaken at 800 rpm for 3 h.
Cell debris was precipitated by centrifugation at 3200 × g and 4 °C for 30 min
and 50 μL of each cleared supernatant transferred to a 1.1 mL 96-deep-well
plate. Then in each well, 50 μL of the secondary alcohol dehydrogenase
(20ADH) crude extract (about 10 U) (37), 10 μL of 1 mM NADPþ, and 20 μL
of 100 mM rac-1d in acetonitrile and 370 μL of 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0) con-
taining 5 mM isopropanol were added. The reaction plates were incubated at
37 °C and shaken at 800 rpm for 24 h. Four Hundred μL of ethyl acetate was
then added to extract the substrate and product from the solution. After
centrifugation, 200 μL of organic layer in each well was transferred into a
new glass-made 96-deep-well plate, and subjected to GC analysis for screen-
ing. Active clones were collected and the results reproduced. The entire gene
MD Simulations. Using the published X-ray structural data of 1W4X, the in
silico structure determinations of the wild type and mutants were performed
with the Schrödinger software package. MD simulations were performed
with the Desmond program by using an algorithm for high-speed parallel
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS. We thank the Fonds der Chemischen Industrie and the
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Schwerpunkt 1170) for generous
support.
1. Cui Q, Karplus M (2008) Allostery and cooperativity revisited. Protein Sci 17:1295–1307.
22. Fraaije MW, et al. (2005) Discovery of a thermostable Baeyer–Villiger monooxygenase
by genome mining. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 66:393–400.
2. Tsai C-J, del Sol A, Nussinov
R (2009) Protein allostery, signal transmission and
23. Malito E, Alfieri A, Fraaije MW, Mattevi A (2004) Crystal structure of a Baeyer–Villiger
monooxygenase. P Natl Acad Sci USA 101:13157–13162.
dynamics: A classification scheme of allosteric mechanisms. Mol Biosyst 5:207–216.
3. Goodey NM, Benkovic SJ (2008) Allosteric regulation and catalysis emerge via
common route. Nat Chem Biol 4:474–482.
4. Ozkan E, Yu H, Deisenhofer J (2005) Mechanistic insight into the allosteric activation of
a ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme by RING-type ubiquitin ligases. P Natl Acad Sci USA
102:18890–18895.
5. Clarkson MW, Gilmore SA, Edgell MH, Lee AL (2006) Dynamic coupling and allosteric
behavior in a nonallosteric protein. Biochemistry 45:7693–7699.
6. Guntas G, Mansell TJ, Kim JR, Ostermeier M (2005) Directed evolution of protein
switches and their application to the creation of ligand-binding proteins. P Natl Acad
Sci USA 102:11224–11229.
7. Lutz S, Bornscheuer UT (2009) Protein Engineering Handbook (Wiley-VCH, Weinheim).
8. Turner NJ (2009) Directed evolution drives the next generation of biocatalysts. Nat
Chem Biol 5:567–573.
9. Jäckel C, Kast P, Hilvert D (2008) Protein design by directed evolution. Annu Rev
Biophys Biomol Struct 37:153–173.
a
24. Zambianchi F, et al. (2007) Titration and assignment of residues that regulate the
enantioselectivity of phenylacetone monooxygenase. Adv Synth Catal 349:1327–1331.
25. Bocola M, et al. (2005) Converting phenylacetone monooxygenase into phenylcyclo-
hexanone monooxygenase by rational design: Towards practical Baeyer–Villiger
monooxygenases. Adv Synth Catal 347:979–986.
26. Reetz MT, Wu S (2008) Greatly reduced amino acid alphabets in directed evolution:
Making the right choice for saturation mutagenesis at homologous enzyme positions.
Chem Commun pp 5499–5501.
27. Mirza IA, et al. (2009) Crystal structures of cyclohexanone monooxygenase reveal com-
plex domain movements and a sliding cofactor. J Am Chem Soc 131:8848–8854.
28. Qu C, Akanuma S, Moriyama H, Tanaka N, Oshima T (1997) A mutation at the interface
between domains causes rearrangement of domains in 3-isopropylmalate dehydro-
genase. Protein Eng 10:45–52.
29. Oue S, Okamoto A, Yano T, Kagamiyama H (1999) Redesigning the substrate specificity
of an enzyme by cumulative effects of the mutations of non-active site residues. J Biol
Chem 274:2344–2349.
30. Atkin KE, et al. (2008) The structure of monoamine oxidase from Aspergillus niger
provides a molecular context for improvements in activity obtained by directed evolu-
tion. J Mol Biol 384:1218–1231.
31. Hogrefe HH, Cline J, Youngblood GL, Allen RM (2002) Creating randomized amino acid
libraries with the QuikChange® multi site-directed mutagenesis kit. BioTechniques
33:1158–1165.
32. Zheng C, Pham VT, Philips RS (1992) Asymmetric reduction of ketoesters with alcohol
dehydrogenase from Thermoanaerobacter ethanolicus. Bioorg Med Chem Lett
2:619–622.
33. Eijsink VGH, Gåseidnes S, Borchert TV, van den Burg B (2005) Directed evolution of
enzyme stability. Biomol Eng 22:21–30.
10. Bershtein S, Tawfik DS (2008) Advances in laboratory evolution of enzymes. Curr Opin
Chem Biol 12:151–158.
11. Reetz MT (2008) Directed evolution as a means to engineer enantioselective enzymes.
Asymmetric Organic Synthesis with Enzymes, ed Gotor V (Wiley-VCH, Weinheim).
12. Reetz MT, Wang L-W, Bocola M (2006) Directed evolution of enantioselective enzymes:
Iterative cycles of CASTing for probing protein-sequence space. Angew Chem
118:1258–1263 Erratum 2556; Angew Chem Int Ed 45:1236–1241; Erratum 2494.
13. Reetz MT, Carballeira JD, Vogel A (2006) Iterative saturation mutagenesis on the basis
of B-factors as
a strategy for increasing protein thermostability. Angew Chem
118:7909–7915 Angew Chem Int Ed 45:7745–7751.
14. Reetz MT, Carballeira JD (2007) Iterative saturation mutagenesis (ISM) for rapid
directed evolution of functional enzymes. Nat Protoc 2:891–903.
15. Wong KF, Selzer T, Benkovic SJ, Hammes-Schiffer S (2005) Impact of distal mutations on
the network of coupled motions correlated to hydride transfer in dihydrofolate reduc-
tase. P Natl Acad Sci USA 102:6807–6812.
16. Reetz MT, et al. (2007) Learning from directed evolution: Further lessons from theo-
retical investigations into cooperative mutations in lipase enantioselectivity.
ChemBioChem 8:106–112.
17. Kayser MM (2009) ‘Designer reagents’ recombinant microorganisms: New and power-
ful tools for organic synthesis. Tetrahedron 65:947–974.
34. Ó’Fágáin C (2003) Enzyme stabilization—recent experimental progress. Enzyme Mi-
crob Tech 33:137–149.
35. Bowers KJ, et al. (2006) Scalable algorithms for molecular dynamics simulations on
commodity clusters. Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE Conference on Supercomputing
(SC06), Tampa, Florida.
36. Reddy AS, Sastry GM, Sastry GN (2007) Cation-aromatic database. Proteins
67:1179–1184.
37. Crowley PB, Golovin A (2005) Cation-pi interactions in protein-protein interfaces.
Proteins 59:231–239.
18. Stewart JD (1998) Cyclohexanone monooxygenase: A useful reagent for asymmetric
Baeyer–Villiger reactions. Curr Org Chem 2:195–216.
19. Mihovilovic MD (2006) Enzyme mediated Baeyer–Villiger oxidations. Curr Org Chem
10:1265–1287.
38. Ichiye T, Karplus M (1994) Collective motions in proteins: A covariance analysis of
atomic fluctuations in molecular dynamics and normal mode simulations. Proteins
11:205–217.
20. Walsh CT, Chen Y-CJ (1988) Enzymic Baeyer–Villiger oxidations by flavin-dependent
monooxygenases. Angew Chem 100:342–352 Angew Chem, Int Ed Engl 27:333–343.
21. Hilker I, Wohlgemuth R, Alphand V, Furstoss R (2005) Microbial transformations 59:
First kilogram scale asymmetric microbial Baeyer–Villiger oxidation with optimized
productivity using a resin-based in situ SFPR strategy. Biotechnol Bioeng 92:702–710.
39. Liu J, Nussinov R (2008) Allosteric effects in the marginally stable von Hippel-Lindau
tumor suppressor protein and allostery-based rescue mutant design. P Natl Acad Sci
USA 105:901–906.
40. Hammes-Schiffer S, Benkovic SJ (2006) Relating protein motion to catalysis. Annu Rev
Biochem 75:519–541.
2780
∣
Wu et al.