with a sufficient nucleofuge in place adjacent to the carbonyl
functionality (Figure 2).
method would provide a simple route to R,R-diaryl ketones.
R-Acylcarbenium ions have been trapped in solution by
treating R-halobenzyl ketones with AgSbF6 in the presence
of phenol and methanol.13,14
We initially tested this reaction design by subjecting
R-ketophosphate 1 to a number of readily available and
inexpensive Lewis acids in the presence of anisole in CH2Cl2
(Table 1). We observed the desired product 2a regardless of
Table 1. Initial Reaction Conditions for the Coupling of
R-Ketophosphate 1 with Anisolea
Figure 2. Umpolung approach to R,R-dialkyl carbonyls.
An umpolung R-alkylation route has precedent. In 2004,
Ready and Malosh described the copper-catalyzed cross-
coupling of primary and secondary organozinc halides with
R-chloroketones, providing R-branched ketones in high
yields with inversion of configuration at the R-carbon.7
In 2008, Breit and Studte described a zinc-catalyzed
stereospecific sp3-sp3 cross-coupling reaction involving
alkyl Grignard reagents and R-hydroxy ester triflates.8 The
umpolung alkylation route becomes especially attractive
if the needed functionality (i.e., nucleofuge) can be directly
installed in conjunction with another synthetic operation.
In this context, we noted a potential connection to our
previous work demonstrating that cyanide-catalyzed ad-
ditions of acyl phosphonates to aldehydes provide R-keto
phosphate products (Figure 2).9,10 Acyl phosphonates are
easily prepared in one step via the Michaelis-Arbuzov
reaction, rendering them a convenient acyl donor. The
“phospha-benzoin” reaction forms a C-C bond and installs
a potential nucleofuge in a concomitant fashion. In principle,
R-substitution reactions are feasible directly on these benzoin
products with no prior functional group manipulation re-
quired, distinguishing this cross-benzoin route from those
conducted with aldehydes, acyl silanes, or benzils as acyl
donors.11,12
entry
Lewis acid
solvent
yield (%)b
1
2
3
TiCl4
CH2Cl2
CH2Cl2
CH2Cl2
CH2Cl2
CH2Cl2
CH2Cl2
CHCl3
66
67
66
66
61
59
76
80
71
99
85
74
66
0
BF3·OEt2
TMSOTf
ZnCl2
4
5c
BF3·OEt2
BF3·OEt2
BF3·OEt2
BF3·OEt2
BF3·OEt2
BF3·OEt2
BF3·OEt2
BF3·OEt2
BF3·OEt2
BF3·OEt2
6d
7e
8
9
CCl4
CH3CN
(CH2)2Cl2
benzene
1,2-DME
10
11
12
13
14-19f
toluene
f
a Reactions were performed on 0.15 mmol scale, using 1.0 equiv of
Lewis acid in CH2Cl2 (1.5 mL) at 23 °C for 5 h. b Isolated yields obtained
after flash chromatography. c Reaction performed at 80 °C for 5 h. d Reaction
performed on 0.15 mmol scale, using 10 mol % catalyst loading. e Entries
7-13 were performed on 0.0285 mmol scale, using 100 mol % of BF3·OEt2
in the specified solvent (0.29 mL) at 23 °C for 5 h. Yields were calculated
by 1H NMR with mesitylene as an internal standard. f Entries 14-19:
t
acetone, BuOMe, Et2O, THF, DMF, DMA.
the Lewis acid tried. Performing the reaction at elevated
temperatures did not increase the yield for this substrate
(entry 5, Table 1). The reaction was catalytic in Lewis acid.
Product formation was seen in 59% yield when 10 mol %
BF3·OEt2 was used (entry 6, Table 1); however, significantly
longer reaction times and diminished yields for a number of
different substrates led us to examine the reaction scope using
a full equivalent of BF3·OEt2.
Reaction conditions with different solvents were also
explored. Several polar aprotic solvents yielded no desired
product, and only R-ketophosphate 1 was recovered (entries
14-19); strongly Lewis basic solvents quelled catalyst
reactivity, but the reaction was tolerant of more moderate
Lewis bases without competitive Ritter-type reactivity (entry
9). Arene alkylation proceeded in less polar solvents as well
as chlorinated solvents, with 1,2-dichloroethane being su-
perior (entry 10).
We hypothesized that treating an R-ketophosphate with
an appropriate Lewis acid could promote phosphate group
ionization and generate an R-acylcarbenium ion that could
be subsequently trapped by an arene nucleophile. Such a
(5) For selected examples in synthesis, see: (a) Liu, X.; Hartwig, J. F.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 5182–5191. (b) Martin, R.; Buchwald, S. L.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 7236–7239. (c) Hama, T.; Hartwig, J. F.
Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 1549–1552. (d) Vo, G. D.; Hartwig, J. F. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 2127–2130. For alternative methods, see: (e) Milne, J. E.;
Murry, J. A.; King, A.; Larsen, R. D. J. Org. Chem. 2009, 74, 445–447,
and references cited therein.
(6) Seebach, D. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1979, 18, 239–336.
(7) Malosh, C. F.; Ready, J. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 12040–
12041.
(8) Studte, C.; Breit, B. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 5451–5455.
(9) Bausch, C. C.; Johnson, J. S. AdV. Synth. Catal. 2005, 347, 1207–
1211.
(10) Demir, A. S.; Reis, O.; Igdir, A. C.; Esiringu, I.; Eymur, S. J. Org.
Chem. 2005, 70, 10584–10587.
(11) Linghu, X.; Bausch, C. C.; Johnson, J. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005,
127, 1833–1840.
After initial optimization, we investigated the scope and
generality of both nucleophile and R-ketophosphate electro-
(12) Demir, A. S.; Reis, O. Tetrahedron 2004, 60, 3803–3811.
Org. Lett., Vol. 12, No. 8, 2010
1785