Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2013, 9, 2002–2008.
(90:10–50:50), Rf 0.60 (hexane/THF 50:50), yield = 0.18 g of a (s, Ar-CH), 32.2 (s, -CH2-), 31.3 (s, -CH2-), 28.9 (s, -CH2-),
white powder (76.1%). HRMS: [M + Na]+ calcd for 24.9 (s, -CH2-), 22.3 (s, -CH2-), 22.1 (s, -CH2-), 13.8 (s, -Me).
C31H37AuN2Na, 657.2520; found, 657.2509. Spectral data:
1H NMR (CDCl3, 25 °C) δ 7.07 (s, 4H, Ar-H), 7.04 (s, 2H,
Supporting Information
=CH), 6.98 (br s, 4H, Ar-H), 2.34 (s, 6H, -Me), 2.16 (s, 12H,
-Me), 1.19 (s, 9H, -Me); 13C{1H} NMR (CDCl3, 25 °C) δ 196.0
Supporting Information File 1
(s, carbene C), 165.4 (s, quat), 146.6 (s, quat), 139.9 (s, Ar-CH),
139.0 (s, quat), 135.4 (s, quat), 134.9 (s, quat), 129.2 (s,
Ar-CH), 123.6 (s, Ar-CH), 121.7 (s, =CH), 34.0 (s, quat), 31.4
(s, -CMe3), 21.1 (s, -Me), 18.0 (s, -Me).
Detailed synthetic procedures for the synthesis of the
arylgold compounds and vinyl ethers as well as NMR
spectra for all new compounds.
General method for the catalyst screening reactions:
microwave and conventional heating: general procedure B:
A reactor vial (10 mL) was charged with the LAuAr species
(1–9, 0.014 mmol), alkyne (0.28 mmol), phenol (0.56 mmol),
and a magnetic stirring bar. After exchanging the air for
nitrogen, the samples were irradiated in a focused microwave
reactor or heated in an oil bath. For the reactions carried out in
the microwave reactor, the initial power setting listed for each
reaction was maintained until the desired temperature was
reached. No ramping periods were used in these reactions; thus,
the reaction time listed is the total irradiation time (not the time
at the desired temperature). After cooling, CDCl3 was added to
the reaction mixtures until homogeneous solutions were
obtained (≈2 mL). Anisole (internal standard, 0.28 mmol) was
added to the solutions and the extent of each reaction was deter-
mined by 1H NMR spectroscopy.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank the National Science Foundation for the
funds to purchase the NMR spectrometer (CHE-0521108) and
Bucknell University for an Undergraduate Research Fellowship
(E.J.M.). Acknowledgment is made to the donors of the Amer-
ican Chemical Society Petroleum Research Fund for support of
this research (51819-UR1 to R. A. S.). The authors thank
Professor David Rovnyak and Brian Breczinski for helpful
discussions on NMR spectroscopy.
References
1. Kuram, M. R.; Bhanuchandra, M.; Sahoo, A. K. J. Org. Chem. 2010,
2. Li, Z.; Brouwer, C.; He, C. Chem. Rev. 2008, 108, 3239–3265.
3. Hashmi, A. S. K. Chem. Rev. 2007, 107, 3180–3211.
Isolation of the vinyl ethers: The synthesis of the vinyl ethers
was carried out following the same general procedure from the
catalyst screening reactions using either 1 or 7 as the catalyst.
Once cooled, the vinyl ethers were purified by column chroma-
tography, dried using molecular sieves (hexane/EtOAc
solution), and isolated as oils or powders following removal of
the volatiles.
5. Oonishi, Y.; Gómez-Suárez, A.; Martin, A. R.; Nolan, S. P.
While this manuscript was under review, the use of a hydroxide bridged
gold dimer to promote the hydrophenoxylation of alkynes was posted
online.
6. Candeias, N. R.; Branco, L. C.; Gois, P. M. P.; Afonso, C. A. M.;
Trindade, A. F. Chem. Rev. 2009, 109, 2703–2802.
Preparation of 4-[[(1Z)-1-butyl-1-hexen-1-yl]oxy]nitroben-
zene (16): General procedure B was followed (microwave
heating) with 1 (0.0088 g, 0.014 mmol), 5-decyne (50.6 μL,
0.28 mmol), and 4-nitrophenol (0.078 g, 0.56 mmol). Tempera-
ture = 130 °C, time = 20 min, initial power level = 50 W. Chro-
matography: silica gel (19.1 g), gradient hexane/EtOAc
(100:0–60:40). Rf 0.67 (hexane/EtOAc 95:5), yield = 0.068 g of
a colorless oil (87%). HRMS: [M + H]+ calcd for C16H24NO3,
278.1758; found, 278.1748. Spectral data: 1H NMR (CDCl3,
25 °C) δ 8.19 (AA'BB', 2H, Ar-H), 6.99 (AA'BB', 2H, Ar-H),
5.12 (t, J = 7.2, 1H, =CH-), 2.15 (t, J = 7.8, 2H, -CH2-), 1.93 (q,
J = 7.2, 2H, -CH2-), 1.47 (m, 2H, -CH2-), 1.34–1.25 (m, 6H,
-CH2-), 0.89 (t, J = 7.2, 3H, -Me), 0.84 (t, J = 6.8, 3H, -Me);
13C{1H} NMR (CDCl3, 25 °C) δ 162.3 (s, quat), 150.0 (s,
quat), 141.9 (s, quat), 126.0 (s, Ar-CH), 117.5 (s, =CH-), 115.5
7. Horváth, I. T.; Anastas, P. T. Chem. Rev. 2007, 107, 2167–2168.
8. Ranke, J.; Stolte, S.; Störmann, R.; Arning, J.; Jastorff, B. Chem. Rev.
9. Mason, B. P.; Price, K. E.; Steinbacher, J. L.; Bogdan, A. R.;
McQuade, D. T. Chem. Rev. 2007, 107, 2300–2318.
10.Andraos, J. Org. Process Res. Dev. 2005, 9, 149–163.
11.Teles, J. H.; Brode, S.; Chabanas, M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1998, 37,
1415–1418.
12.Schmidbaur, H.; Schier, A. Z. Naturforsch., B 2011, 66, 329–350.
13.Leyva, A.; Corma, A. J. Org. Chem. 2009, 74, 2067–2074.
2007