10.1002/anie.201805908
Angewandte Chemie International Edition
COMMUNICATION
realized (Table 1, entries 2–4). We hypothesized that these Rh
catalysts gave the same catalytic species, through replacement
of these ligands by CO molecule. In addition, catalyst
Rh(CO)(PPh3)2Cl was found to be ineffective and the reaction
substrate was recovered (Table 1, entry 5). Solvents other than
DCE were found to be less effective for the [4+2+1] cycloaddition
using [Rh(COD)Cl]2 as catalyst (Table 1, entries 6 – 10). For
example, a complex mixture was obtained for the reaction carried
out in DCM. In additon, the [4+2+1] cycloaddition can be carried
out at higher temperature, and a yield of 82% was reached as that
from the reaction at 40 °C (Table 1, entry 11). We were happy to
find that the [4+2+1] cycloaddition can be operated by using 5
mol% of [Rh(COD)Cl]2 to give comparable yield as that from the
reaction using 10 mol% catalyst, even though the reaction had to
extend to 24 h (Table 1, entry 12). Finally, we investigated how
the CO pressure affected the reaction.[3d] Using 0.2 atm CO
pressure was less effective and the reaction yield was only 69%
(Table 1, entry 13). Based on the results in Table 1, we then
decided to study the scope of the [4+2+1] cycloaddition using the
conditions in entry 12 of Table 1 for ene-ene-allene susbtrates
(Table 2). Interestingly, the triene byproduct 3a was isolated as
the major product when using iridium catalyst instead of rhodium
catalysts (Table 1, entry 14).
We also investigated the influence of the substitution patterns
in the propargyl ester moiety of the substrates. Substrates with
two substituted groups attached to the propargyl ester moiety
showed good reactivity, and moderate to good reaction yields
were obtained (Table 2, entries 2–4). Substrate 1e with only one
substituted group in the propargyl ester moiety was slow for the
[4+2+1] reaction under the standard conditions. Consequently,
higher reaction temperature (75 °C) and higher catalyst loading
(10%) had to be applied for substrate 1e, which, under the new
reaction conditions, gave a moderate yield (44%) and Z/E-mixture
of [4+2+1] cycloadducts.
It was anticipated that the allene moiety of the ene-ene-allene
could not have two large groups, otherwise, the [4+2+1]
cycloadduct could suffer from severe repulsion because the
corresponding allene insertion transition states in the [4+2+1]
reaction could be difficult to be accessed. This was proved to be
true because terminal diphenyl substituted substrate 1m
decomposed under the standard reaction conditions (Scheme 3).
We also tested whether the two-π component in the substrates
can have substituents at its terminal position. Complex mixtures
could be achieved using substrates 1n and 1o. In addition,
substrate 1p with two methyl groups in the terminal position of the
two-π ene part were synthesized, and the corresponding triene
product was isolated in 55% yield, without the formation of [4+2+1]
cycloadduct (see the Supporting Information for details).
We also synthesized yne-ene-propargyl ester substrate 1q[12]
to study whether the 2C synthon of the [4+2+1] cycloaddition can
be alkynes. To our delight, under the optimized reaction
conditions for ene-ene-propargyl ester substrates, the [4+2+1]
cycloaddition of 1q can give product 2q in 51% yield. Further
study of [4+2+1] cycloaddition of more yne-ene-propargyl ester
susbtrates will be carried out in the future.
Herein we want to point out that, lower yields for some
substrates in Table 2 usually had some isomerization products,
as judged by TLC (for example, 1h). Since we only concentrated
on developing a method for the 5/7 ring synthesis, we neither
isolated nor characterized these side products (except 3a). Under
the optimization reaction conditions for all substrates in Table 2,
only trace amount of [4+2] products could be detected by TLC.
In summary, a novel Rh(I)-catalyzed two-component [4+2+1]
cycloaddition of CO and in situ generated ene/yne-enynes from
conjugated ene/yne-yne propargyl esters has been developed.
This reaction features easily prepared substrates and broad
scope to reach 5/7 skeleton. Quaternary carbon centers can also
be introduced at the bridgehead position of the bicyclic 5/7 system.
This methodology represents the second successful example of
transition metal catalyzed [4+2+1] cycloaddition. Further study of
the reaction scope, its application in synthesis, and understanding
the reaction mechanism is ongoing.
We were happy to observe that substrates 1f and 1g, which
did not have the substitution in the internal alkene part of ene-
ene-ynes gave good yields (70% and 75%, respectively, see
Table 2, entries 6 and 7). Substrate 1h bearing methyl
substitutions in alkene moiety of the ene-ene-ynes generated
[4+2+1] cycloadduct 2h with bridgehead quaternary carbon
center in 44% yield (Table 2, entry 8).
Acknowledgements
We changed the N-Ts tether in the substrate to C and O
tethers to further investigate the reaction scope. The [4+2+1]
cycloadditions gave 94% and 85% reaction yields for 1i (with C
tether) and 1k (with O tether), respectively (Table 2, entries 9 and
11). We were excited to note that substrates 1j with C tether and
1l with O tether can reach high yields of [4+2+1] products 2j and
2l, both of which have a methyl group at the bridgehead positions
of the 5/7 skeleton (Table 2, entries 10 and 12).
We thank the National Natural Science Foundation of China
(21472005) for financial support. We also thank Prof. Dr. Wen-
Xiong Zhang and Dr. Neng-Dong Wang of Peking University for
X-ray crystal analysis.
Keywords: [4+2+1] • rhodium • ene/yne-ene-allene • 1,3-acyloxy
migration •cycloaddition
[1]
a) R. A. Craig, II., B. M. Stoltz, Chem. Rev. 2017, 117, 7878; b) M. Liu,
W.-G. Wang, H.-D. Sun, J.-X. Pu, Nat. Prod. Rep. 2017, 34, 1090.
T. V. Nguyen, J. M. Hartmann, D. Enders, Synthesis 2013, 45, 845.
For selected reviews, see: a) X.-Z. Shu, D. Shu, C. M. Schienebeck, W.
Tang, Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 7698; b) K. E. O. Ylijoki, J. M. Stryker,
Chem. Rev. 2013, 113, 2244; c) H. Pellissier, Adv. Synth. Catal. 2011,
353, 189; d) Y. Wang, Z.-X. Yu, Acc. Chem. Res. 2015, 48, 2288. For
selected recent [5+2] reactions, see: C.-H. Liu, Z.-X. Yu, Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 8667; Angew. Chem. 2017, 129, 8793.
[2]
[3]
Scheme 3. Unsuccessful substrates for [4+2+1] cycloaddition.
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.