A. Majhi et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. 18 (2010) 1591–1598
1597
121.8, 112.3, 110.1, 101.3, 69.0, 55.9 (2), 31.9, 29.6 (2), 29.5 (2),
docking studies. The average structure from the combined 20
structures for the PKChC1B was selected using INSIGHT II.
29.4, 29.3, 29.0, 25.9, 22.6, 21.0, 14.1; ESI-MS m/z 816 [M]+.
Homology model for PKCeC1B has been generated using UNI-
4.4. Bacterial expression and purification of the PKC
and hC1B subdomains
e
C1B, dC1B
tools for the automatic homology model generation. PKCh C1B
(PDB code: 2ENZ) has nearly 66% sequence homology with
The PKC C1B subdomains fused with glutathione S-transferase
(GST) were expressed in BL21(DE3) gold E. coli and purified as de-
scribed earlier.16 Briefly, cell pellets were treated with 1% Triton X-
100 and lysozyme (1 mg/ml), followed by sonication and centrifu-
gation. The clarified supernatant was then applied to a glutathione-
Sepharose column. The bound protein was thoroughly washed
with phosphate buffer saline, released by thrombin cleavage,
eluted with phosphate-buffered saline, and concentrated by
ammonium sulfate precipitation (80%). Proteins were further puri-
fied by fast performance liquid chromatography (Akta Purifier)
using a Superdex™ 75 column (GE Healthcare Biosciences), a mo-
bile phase of 50 mm Tris, 100 mm NaCl, pH 7.2, and a flow rate of
0.5 ml/min.
PKCeC1B and thus used as a template. Energy minimization
(ꢁ1741.670 kJ/mol) was done using the same program. The model
was validated using VERIFY3D and all the amino acids residues had
an acceptable score above zero. The model space analysis for
PKCeC1B was done using the Ramachandran Plot (http://dic-
100% residues were within the allowed region (52.08% in the Fully
Allowed Region (FAR), 35.42% in the Additional Allowed Region
(AAR) and 12.50% were in the Generously Allowed Region (GAR))
thereby, validating the model.
Molecular docking was performed on Surflex module of Sybyl 7.3
using Threshold-0.5, Bloat-2.0 and Radius-3 Å for the protomol gen-
eration. Residues Tyr-239, Lys-240, Ser-241, Pro-242, Thr-243, Phe-
244, Leu-251, Leu-252, Trp-253, Gly-254, Leu-255 and Glu-258 of
PKC theta; Tyr-238, Met-239, Ser-240, Pro-241, Thr-242, Phe-243,
Leu-250, Leu-251, Trp-252, Gly-253, Leu-254 and Gln-257 for PKC
delta and Tyr-250, Lys-251, Val-252, pro-253, Thr-254, Phe-255,
Leu-262, Leu-263, Trp-264, Gly-265, Leu-266 and Gln-269 for PKC
epsilon were used. These residues were selected by comparing the
PKCactivator phorbolester bindingsitein PKC deltaC1B.53 Ringflex-
ibility and Post Dock energy minimization were applied on each
structure. Higher C-score values represent better fitting.
4.5. Fluorescence studies
Fluorescence spectra were recorded on PTI LPS 220B equipped
with temperature and stirring control systems. A 1.5-ml cuvette
(Hellma) with a Teflon stopper was used for fluorescence measure-
ments. For fluorescence quenching experiments, protein (2
and varying concentration of ligands (2–34 M) were incubated
in a buffer solution (50 mM Tris, 150 mM NaCl, 2 mM DTT,
50 M ZnSO4, pH 7.2) at 25 °C. Protein was excited at 280 nm
lM)
l
l
and emission spectra were recorded from 300 nm to 650 nm. Fluo-
rescence intensity data, (F0 ꢁ F)/F were plotted against the ligand
concentration to generate the binding curves, where F and F0 rep-
resented the fluorescence intensity at 350 nm in the presence and
in the absence of ligand, respectively. For EC50 measurement, all
curves were fitted with the Hill equation using Igor Pro 4. Effect
of proteins on the emission maxima of the compounds was mea-
Acknowledgements
This research has been supported by the National Institutes of
Health Grant G096452. Molecular docking studies were performed
at the Center for Experimental Therapeutics and Pharmaco Infor-
matics at the College of Pharmacy, University of Houston.
sured by using 5
phorbol ester, 0.5
Tris, 150 mM NaCl, 2 mM DTT, 50
l
l
M each of 1 and 4 with 50
M SAPD and 5 M protein in buffer (50 mM
M ZnSO4, pH 7.2). 1, 4 and SAPD
lM protein and for
l
l
References and notes
were incubated with the proteins for 1 h and excited at 425 nm,
389 nm and 355 nm, respectively. The wavelength maxima of the
emission spectra were determined by fitting the symmetrical top
of the spectra to a Gaussian function with Igor Pro 4 (WaveMetrics,
Inc., Lake Oswego, OR).
Fluorescence anisotropy was measured in the same fluorimeter
using parallel and perpendicular polarizers. The steady-state
anisotropy, (r), is defined as
1. Battaini, F.; Mochly-Rosen, D. Pharmacol. Res. 2007, 55, 461.
2. Koivunen, J.; Aaltonen, V.; Peltonen, J. Cancer Lett. 2006, 235, 1.
3. Griner, E. M.; Kazanietz, M. G. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2007, 7, 281.
4. Evcimen, N.; King, G. L. Pharmacol. Res. 2007, 55, 498.
5. Bright, R.; Mochly-Rosen, D. Stroke 2005, 36, 2781.
6. Chou, W. H.; Messing, R. O. Trends Cardiovasc. Med. 2005, 15, 47.
7. Sabri, A.; Steinberg, S. F. Mol. Cell. Biochem. 2003, 251, 97.
8. Alkon, D. L.; Sun, M. K.; Nelson, T. J. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 2007, 28, 51.
9. Hofmann, J. Curr. Cancer Drug Targets 2004, 4, 125.
10. Newton, A. C. Chem. Rev. 2001, 101, 2353.
ðrÞ ¼ ðIII ꢁ IAÞ=ðIII þ 2IAÞ
where III and IA are the polarized fluorescence intensities in the
directions parallel and perpendicular, respectively, to the excitation
polarization.
11. Nishizuka, Y. Science 1992, 258, 607.
12. Colon-Gonzalez, F.; Kazanietz, M. G. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2006, 1761, 827.
13. Yang, C.; Kazanietz, M. G. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 2003, 24, 602.
14. Das, J.; Addona, G. H.; Sandberg, W. S.; Husain, S. S.; Stehle, T.; Miller, K. W. J.
Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 37964.
15. Das, J.; Zhou, X.; Miller, K. W. Protein Sci. 2006, 15, 2107.
16. Das, J.; Pany, S.; Rahman, G. M.; Slater, S. J. Biochem. J. 2009, 421, 405.
17. Blumberg, P. M.; Kedei, N.; Lewin, N. E.; Yang, D.; Czifra, G.; Pu, Y.; Peach, M. L.;
Marquez, V. E. Curr. Drug Targets 2008, 9, 641.
18. Gennas, G. B.; Talman, V.; Aitio, O.; Ekokoski, E.; Finel, M.; Tuominen, R. K.; Yli-
Kauhaluoma, J. J. Med. Chem. 2009, 52, 3969. and references cited therein.
19. Zhang, G.; Kazanietz, M. G.; Blumberg, P. M.; Hurley, J. H. Cell 1995, 81, 917.
20. Irie, K.; Nakagawa, Y.; Ohigashi, H. Chem. Rec. 2005, 5, 185.
21. Yanagita, R. C.; Nakagawa, Y.; Yamanaka, N.; Kashiwagi, K.; Saito, N.; Irie, K. J.
Med. Chem. 2008, 51, 46.
4.6. Generation of 3D models of PKC C1B subdomains and
molecular docking
Three-dimensional structures of curcumin and its derivatives
were generated using ChemDraw Ultra 7.0 and Cactus, a web based
tures were subjected to pre-dock energy minimization using an-
22. Aggarwal, B. B.; Sung, B. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 2009, 30, 85.
23. Singh, S. Cell 2007, 130, 765.
24. Mehta, K.; Pantazis, P.; McQueen, T.; Aggarwal, B. B. Anti-Cancer Drugs 1997, 8,
470.
25. Kuo, M. L.; Huang, T. S.; Lin, J. K. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1996, 1317, 95.
26. Jee, S. H.; Shen, S. C.; Tseng, C. R.; Chiu, H. C.; Kuo, M. L. J. Invest. Dermatol. 1998,
111, 656.
27. Kawamori, T.; Lubet, R.; Steele, V. E.; Kelloff, G. J.; Kaskey, R. B.; Rao, C. V.;
Reddy, B. S. Cancer Res. 1999, 597.
The crystal structures of PKCd (PDB code: 1PTQ), and the phor-
bol-13-OAc bound PKCd (PDB code: 1PTR).19 NMR structure of the
PKC theta C1B (PDB code: 2ENZ)52 and a homology modeled struc-
ture of PKCe C1B have been used as the receptors for molecular