detection method for low concentrations of acrolein would
find applications in medical, biological and other fields.
cent upon reaction with acrolein. Our design strategy is
summarized in Scheme 1. A lanthanide complex for TRF
A currently used conventional method for acrolein detec-
tion is fluorescence analysis based on the Skraup reaction
with m-aminophenol.7 In this method, the plasma of patients
is reacted with m-aminophenol, the product, 7-hydrox-
yquinoline, is separated by HPLC, and its fluorescence is
quantified. HPLC separation cannot be avoided, because (i)
the background fluorescence of plasma excited at 350-400
nm, which is the excitation wavelength of 7-hydroxyquino-
line, is quite high and (ii) the quantum yield of 7-hydrox-
yquinoline is quite low. However, HPLC separation is not
suitable for high-throughput measurement of multiple samples
using microplates. Acrolein-protein adducts can also be
detected using monoclonal antibody,5,8 but the method is
costly and needs complicated procedures. Additionally, there
is a lag of several hours between production of acrolein and
that of acrolein-protein adducts. Here we report a novel
luminescence-based method of acrolein detection that is
suitable for high-throughput microplate assays without HPLC
separation.
Scheme 1. (A) Schematic Representation of the Mechanism of
Our Probe. Skraup Reaction Forms an Extended-Conjugate
System. The Product Is Strongly Luminescent when Excited at
the Appropriate Wavelength. (B) Reaction of the Designed
Probe with Acrolein
The method of time-resolved fluorescence (TRF) measure-
ment was selected as a basis for the development of the assay.
It makes use of the characteristic long-lived luminescence
of certain compounds, especially lanthanide complexes.9 In
TRF measurement, the luminescence signal is collected for
a certain gate time after an appropriate delay time, following
a pulsed excitation. Lanthanide complexes have long lumi-
nescence lifetimes of the order of milliseconds, in contrast
to usual organic compounds, which have luminescence
lifetimes of the order of nanoseconds. By taking advantage
of this unique character, the influence of short-lived back-
ground fluorescence and scattered light can be reduced to a
negligible level, and the long-lived lanthanide luminescence
can be distinguished from background signals.10 Lanthanide
complexes also have large stokes shifts, which can further
decrease the background. Because of these advantages, TRF
measurements are employed in various fields where both
small assay scale and high sensitivity are required, especially
immunoassays11 and high-throughput screening.12
measurement usually consists of two parts, an antenna moiety
and a chelator moiety. We thought that the luminescence
properties could be precisely controlled if the absorbance
spectrum of the antenna moiety changed as a result of
reaction with acrolein. We chose an aniline structure as the
antenna and the Skraup reaction as the controlling reaction
(Scheme 1). The Skraup reaction of aniline is well-known
as being highly specific for acrolein, and the λmax of the
aniline moiety is greatly increased by quinoline formation.
In addition, the quinoline ring is a good energy transfer donor
to lanthanide complex.13 As the chelator, we selected
diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (DTPA) because (i) DTPA
has the ability to form a strong complex with europium ion
and to emit bright luminescence14 and (ii) it has high
solubility in aqueous solution. The probe composed of aniline
and DTPA moieties, p-NH2PhDTPA, was designed according
to Scheme 1. Before the Skraup reaction, the probe is
expected to emit no luminescence because it is not able to
absorb at the excitation wavelength for quinoline. In contrast,
the product of the reaction with acrolein can absorb the light
and emit luminescence via energy transfer to the europium
To achieve sensitive detection, we must control the
luminescence properties of our probe, which should have
no luminescence itself, but should become highly lumines-
(7) (a) Alarcon, R. A. Anal. Chem. 1968, 40, 1704. (b) Bohnenstengel,
F.; Eichelbaum, M.; Golbs, E.; Kroemer, H. K. J. Chromatogr. B 1997,
692, 163.
(8) Sakata, K.; Kashiwagi, K.; Sharmin, S.; Ueda, S.; Igarashi, K.
Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2003, 31, 371
.
(9) Mizukami, S.; Kikuchi, K.; Higuchi, T.; Urano, Y.; Mashima, T.;
Tsuruo, T.; Nagano, T. FEBS Lett. 1999, 453, 356.
(10) (a) Parker, D.; Dickins, R. S.; Puschmann, H.; Crossland, C.;
Howard, J. A. K. Chem. ReV. 2002, 102, 1977. (b) Døssing, A. Eur. J. Inorg.
Chem. 2005, 1425.
Table 1. Photochemical Properties of the Probes
a
(11) Johansson, M. K.; Cook, R. M.; Xu, J.; Raymond, K. N. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 16451.
Absmax (nm)
Em(max) (nm)
Φfl (%)
p- NH2PhDTPA-Eu
Q-DTPA-Eu
243
320
n.d.b
618
n.d.b
4.6
(12) Yuan, J.; Wang, G.; Majima, K.; Matsumoto, K. Anal. Chem. 2001,
73, 1869.
(13) Hanaoka, K.; Kikuchi, K.; Kojima, H.; Urano, Y.; Nagano, T. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 12470.
a Quantum yields were determined using [Ru(bpy)3]Cl2 (Φ ) 0.028 in
water) as a standard. Measurements were performed in 50 mM sodium
phosphate buffer (pH 3.5). b Not determined.
(14) (a) Moeller, T.; Thompson, L. C. J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem. 1962, 24,
499–510. (b) Terai, T.; Kikuchi, K.; Iwasawa, S. Y.; Kawabe, T.; Hirata,
Y.; Urano, Y.; Nagano, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 6938.
Org. Lett., Vol. 12, No. 8, 2010
1705